> I'm certainly confused. Is it simply that you don't like doing a > .get() when passing in an object?
Yes, exactly. To me, get() implies the criminal act of circumventing reference-counting to get a raw/direct C pointer to an object which then becomes vulnerable to being deleted. Thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
