There are a couple of scenarios that I'd like to discuss that have to do with updating bundles and mixing R3 and R4. Whilst I agree some of them are a bit theoretical, I'd like to get your opinions on how to deal with them (best practices if you wish). These issues are related to the Bundle-SymbolicName.
When talking about Bundle-SymbolicName, the spec (3.5.2) says: The installation of a bundle with a Bundle-SymbolicName and Bundle-Version identical to an existing bundle must fail. Furthermore, on bundle validity the spec (3.11) says (amongst other things): Updating a bundle to a bundle that has the same symbolic name and version as another installed bundle [causes a bundle to fail]. Scenario 1: Updating an R4 bundle with symbolic name A to one with symbolic name B. Provided B (with the same version) does not exist yet, this should not fail, although for me it is strange to change the symbolic name in an update. Scenario 2: Updating an R3 bundle to an R4 bundle. Provided the symbolic name and version of the R4 bundle does not fail, this should be possible. Scenario 3: Updating an R4 bundle to an R3 bundle. This should be possible, but might break dependencies that are using the symbolic name. Any comments on this? Greetings, Marcel _______________________________________________ osgi-dev mailing list osgi-dev@bundles.osgi.org http://bundles.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
