On Sunday 20 August 2006 19:14, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Gang, > > I want to clarify that I understand this specification, before running off > doing stuff;
Hmmm, disregard this mail entirely. I'll reformulate after pondering some more on how things are expected to be. Cheers Niclas > 1. Is it correct that Initial Provisioning is either supported directly by > the framework? My concern revolves around the PROVISIONING_START_BUNDLE > must be given AllPermissions, hence becoming a requirement on the > framework. A framework bootstrapper could know how to manipulate the > configuration files of the framework to make this happen, but it > seems 'icky'. > > 2. The Management Agent will always have the Name field in the Zip file > set to "provisioning.start.bundle", and "should/must/must not" one support > multiple entries with this name? My take is that it must not be supported, > as that name would also need to be stored in the Dictionary, which I think > must have unique keys. > > 3. The PROVISIONING_REFERENCE has a similar issue. "should/must/must not" > support multiple entries in the same Zip file? And what happens to the > Dictionary entry? Is it just containing the last reference loaded? > > 4. Finally, how come one don't see much implementations around this spec? > At least I have not been able to find any in the OSS world. > > > Cheers > Niclas > _______________________________________________ > osgi-dev mailing list > osgi-dev@bundles.osgi.org > http://bundles.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev _______________________________________________ osgi-dev mailing list osgi-dev@bundles.osgi.org http://bundles.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
