2008/11/12 David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I am using the KF impl. I thought I understood the model, but maybe I'm
> wrong, so I wanted to check here first.
>
> I have a User who implies a basic membership of both GroupA and GroupB
> (not a direct member, but membership is implied).
> (Tested and both evaluate to hasRole=true)
>
> Both GroupA and GroupB and required members of TargetGroup.
> (Also checked, and they really are members)
>
> So, if both GroupA and GroupB are required members of TargetGroup, and I
> can verify that:
>
> userAuth.hasRole( groupA.id ) == true
>
> &&
>
> userAuth.hasRole( groupB.id ) == true
>
> Should this then not evaluate to true??
>
> userAuth.hasRole( targetGroup.id );
>
>
> It evaluates to false in my case...
>
> Am I misunderstanding something, or do I need to signal a bug for the KF
> code?
>
from the compendium spec, p158:
"For example, an initiator Role object X implies an action Group object A
if:
• X implies at least one of A's basic members, and
• X implies all of A's required members."
so does targetGroup have any basic members?
(btw, you can add Role.USER_ANYONE as a basic member to match anyone)
> Thanks!
> =dml
> _______________________________________________
> OSGi Developer Mail List
> [email protected]
> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
>
--
Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
