I do not think this is specified anywhere so I would not rely on it. It is also
not necessary because once you know the actual signing certificate you can
easily traverse the list to find its signer, and then its signers.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 24 jan 2011, at 06:46, Shigekuni Kondo wrote:
> Hi OSGi Experts,
>
>
> I'm working on the RFC140.
> I have a question about Bundle#getSignerCertificates(int).
>
> [Description in OSGi Core R4.2]
> "
> The value for a key is a List containing the X509Certificate
> chain for the signer. The first item in the List is the signer's
> X509Certificate which is then followed by the rest of the
> X509Certificate chain.
> "
>
> [Question]
> Are the order of elements in the List and the order of
> X509Certificate chain the same order?
> While the CA is contained as last item in X509Certificate
> chain, is it the last element in the List?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Shigekuni Kondo
>
> _____________________________________________
>
> Shigekuni Kondo
>
> Promotion Project 1
> NTT Cyber Solutions Laboratories
> NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
>
> 1-1 Hikarinooka Yokosuka
> Kanagawa 239-0847 Japan
> TEL:+81-46-859-3444
> FAX:+81-46-855-1282
> E-mail:[email protected]
> _____________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSGi Developer Mail List
> [email protected]
> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
