Nice! Me 2:) I'm in beginning! Got some time to read the spec again! checked out theses implementations, and jigsaw:) Now understand the OSGi guys why struggle against jigsaw. Support the point, module system must based on OSGi model! In the view progress, knopflerfish give me more impression. There are some similar things between OSGi and FIPA. but seems the concepts in OSGi more in nature! Current, I have my own libraries: ON, event bus, log, bytecode tool. In my point, ON most important, some like antlr+spring beans. I heard that Pascal said the dependency graph NP problem. But I not know about other hard points in the implementation.
There is a why to rework? 1,From my opinion, ON must be pervasive, it's a superset of c structure like, include json. 2,I not care the JDK version. I just focus the newest. Happy to hear your advice. Thank you very much. 致敬 向雅 2012/9/12 Roberto Perillo <[email protected]>: > Greetings, everyone! > > I'm currently working on my master's dissertation and it's going to be about > OSGi and plugin-based development. What I'd like to ask you guys is, what > are the flaws that you guys see in OSGi (or development with OSGi) nowadays? > What are the things that you would like to be improved (if any)? What are > the things that you guys don't like about OSGi? > > I'm planning to create a framework, and I have some ideas. But I'd love to > hear from you what could be improved: maybe I could include some of the > things in my framework. It definitelly would help me a lot. > > Thank you very much! > > Best regards, > Roberto. > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
