-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] Interpretation of semantic versioning? From: BJ Hargrave <[email protected]> To: OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]> Date: Sun 14 Apr 2013 04:58:32 PM CDT > > I certainly agree with Emily that having a default of @ProviderType > > is sensible, since the normal case for most APIs is to call methods > > on it, not to implement interfaces of it. > > People keep saying this without presenting any data to back it up. I > don't know that answer but I am not making any claim here. conceivably, a tool could be made to scan * osgi alliance bundles * maven central * spring obr * etc
and collect empirical stats to answer this question.
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
