Implementing resolver hooks, service hooks, etc for the Subsystems 
specification. You need to make sure the hook implementations are 
operating before normal bundles to ensure the proper isolation is in 
place.

Most developers should not be implementing framework extensions.
-- 

BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
[email protected]

office: +1 386 848 1781
mobile: +1 386 848 3788




From:   Cristiano Gavião <[email protected]>
To:     OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]>
Date:   2013/10/03 13:48
Subject:        [osgi-dev] RFC 204 - Framework Extension Activators doubt
Sent by:        [email protected]



Hello,

I'm reading the RFC 204 and something is not clear in my mind.
Initially I was thinking it would be useful to other specs that uses 
Extender concepts as OSGi JPA, DS or Blueprint that needs to be 
activated before any other bundle. But at the end of the reading I 
haven't sure... :)

Could someone give some real, practical use cases of such spec/api ?

thanks in advance.

regards,

Cristiano

_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev


_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to