Actually I hope that with JPM4J integration (see jpm4j.org) we will be able to do much better than Maven...
As Ferry points out, the problem with using Maven central directly is that most of its contents are not bundles. JPM is an effort to create a global repository for OSGi bundles, however we are still working on this integration. For now most organisations tend to use their own internal bundle repositories. This may be some effort to set up initially but it has advantages for the organisation in terms of control and governance, since Maven central can be something like the Wild West! Regards Neil On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Ferry Huberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 17/11/13 10:09, Daniel McGreal wrote: > >> Or just copy-dependencies goal? >> >> > we have something in development as a better solution to the Maven > 'problem', but since none of us use it, it's not really high on our list of > things to do. help welcome... > > On 17 Nov 2013, at 09:05, Ferry Huberts <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> If you really want to use Maven (none of the bndtools developers do) >>> then you should look into the maven bundle plugin. >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSGi Developer Mail List >> [email protected] >> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev >> >> > -- > Ferry Huberts > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev >
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
