Thank you for your answer, especially the point about the mutable Condition.

In our case however, permissions are still pretty dynamic: we use them to 
control which application can use which device and this can be changed while 
the application is running.

Another way of implementing this would be to use a proxy pattern to manage 
permission: the client bundle would use the proxified services and the 
permission dynamicity would be managed at this proxy level (which communicates 
with our permission manager and thus 'knows' when permissions have changed). It 
clearly needs more thought but could avoid restarting the bundle, at the cost 
of increased complexity.
For the time being I think I'll simply restart the bundles ! :)

Regards,

Pierre

De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De 
la part de BJ Hargrave
Envoyé : mardi 3 décembre 2013 17:56
À : OSGi Developer Mail List
Objet : Re: [osgi-dev] Declarative Services and Conditional permission Admin

It is just the way things are. Permissions should not really be that dynamic. 
As Tom observed, there is no way for an observer to tell that the permissions 
have changes. Given custom (mutable) Condition classes, a permissions check 
result can change from implies call to implies call, so a permissions change 
listener would not provide useful information.

--
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance<http://www.osgi.org/>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


office: +1 386 848 1781
mobile: +1 386 848 3788





From:        <[email protected]>
To:        OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]>
Date:        2013/12/03 09:53
Subject:        Re: [osgi-dev] Declarative Services and Conditional permission 
Admin
Sent by:        [email protected]

________________________________





OK, thanks a lot for your quick answer.

I guess I'll have to develop a start / stop functionality into my permission 
manager bundle then.

Do you know if this point is a deliberate choice from the specification or just 
an unfortunate coincidence ?
I'm working with Device Services (from Device Access) and use permissions to 
restrict access to devices to specific applications ; restarting an application 
to take into account a new device is feasible yet not really convenient.

regards,

Pierre
________________________________

De : [email protected] [[email protected]] de la part 
de Thomas Watson [[email protected]]
Envoyé : mardi 3 décembre 2013 15:37
À : OSGi Developer Mail List
Objet : Re: [osgi-dev] Declarative Services and Conditional permission Admin

There is no permissions listener to be notified when permissions change.  A DS 
runtime is not going to notice that a service is no longer visible when 
permissions change.  Similarly a ServiceTracker is also not going to be 
notified (with the adding or removed methods) that a service is now visible or 
not to the BundleContext used by the ServiceTracker.  This means that optional 
non-static service dependencies will not be dynamically injected when security 
changes.

Also, there will be issues when taking away service permissions.  A component Y 
that got injected with service X but then later service permission for X got 
revoked for the bundle with the component Y will not result in unbinding the 
service X from component Y.  If this is a concern then I think you would have 
to detect which bundles are using the service X and restart them to make sure 
they use the new permission policy.

Tom



[Inactive hide details for ---12/03/2013 08:13:01 AM---Hi all, I'm working with 
Declarative Service and I've just started to add]---12/03/2013 08:13:01 AM---Hi 
all, I'm working with Declarative Service and I've just started to add security 
to our developmen

From: <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
Date: 12/03/2013 08:13 AM
Subject: [osgi-dev] Declarative Services and Conditional permission Admin
Sent by: [email protected]
________________________________



Hi all,

I'm working with Declarative Service and I've just started to add security to 
our development using Conditional Permission Admin.

There is a case where I'm not sure what is the expected behavior : I have a 
component which declares an optional and dynamic reference to a service, for 
which it's bundle does not have the necessary permissions : the component is 
activated but the service is not injected in the component (as specified in the 
security section of Declarative Services specifications).
Now, what should happen if the permission are dynamically changed and the 
bundle can access the service : should the service be injected immediately (as 
it has the dynamic policy) ? I do not find anything in the specification about 
this question.

This raises another question : is it possible for a bundle (SCR or not) to be 
notified when permissions have been changed ? Configuration Admin defines a 
ConfigurationListener to be notified of configuration changes, but I don't find 
anything similar for permissions.

Any ideas about these issues ?

regards,

Pierre Rust
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

<<inline: image001.gif>>

_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to