> From: Raymond Auge <[email protected]> > BJ bundles are not limited to using only a single spec! OSGi is > modular after all, no?
> It's entirely possible for a bundle to use several extenders at > once. This is a completely legitimate use case. > This is exactly the case I'm dealing with. > I don't think what I'm asking is outlandish. It is a case discussed in the OSGi EGs and that we never agreed to solve. Basically, we don't support multiple "active" extenders like DS, Blueprint and Web Application Specification each trying to control a bundle. There is no way to coordinate that as you see. We certainly expect different bundles to use different technologies, but did not do anything to support a single bundle to be extended by multiple active extenders. What you are attempting to do is outside the scope of the existing OSGi specifications. I highly recommend you split the bundle up so that only a single active extender is controlling each bundle. -- BJ Hargrave Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance [email protected] office: +1 386 848 1781 mobile: +1 386 848 3788
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
