Slack is also fine for me. However, there is a 10k searchable message limit
for free accounts, which might seem like a lot, but is not really. Note
that irc has no searchability at all so there's that ...

- Ray
On Aug 30, 2015 8:31 AM, "Frank Langel" <fr...@frankjlangel.com> wrote:

> I think we need better and more concise information, perhaps a better osgi
> website, but IRC is not high on my list. And if we do something realtime,
> please lets open a SLACK channel…
>
>
>
>
> On 8/29/15, 6:00 PM, "osgi-dev-requ...@mail.osgi.org" <
> osgi-dev-requ...@mail.osgi.org> wrote:
>
> >Send osgi-dev mailing list submissions to
> >       osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
> >
> >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >       https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
> >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >       osgi-dev-requ...@mail.osgi.org
> >
> >You can reach the person managing the list at
> >       osgi-dev-ow...@mail.osgi.org
> >
> >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >than "Re: Contents of osgi-dev digest..."
> >
> >
> >Today's Topics:
> >
> >   1. IRC etc. (Raymond Auge)
> >   2. creating default instances from service factories (Raymond Auge)
> >   3. Re: creating default instances from service factories
> >      (BJ Hargrave)
> >   4. Re: creating default instances from service factories
> >      (Raymond Auge)
> >   5. Re: IRC etc. (Tobias Roeser)
> >
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >Message: 1
> >Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:34:17 -0400
> >From: Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com>
> >To: OSGi Developer Mail List <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
> >Subject: [osgi-dev] IRC etc.
> >Message-ID:
> >       <CAMm6HcBo5CTMFA=
> otwtou_mgeqszmnksgbt_fvvtdg+zo18...@mail.gmail.com>
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> >Hello everyone,
> >
> >Would anyone be interested in having a real time channel about osgi? I'm
> >thinking an IRC channel on freenode, or a gitter room on the
> github.com/osgi
> >project or something like that.
> >
> >Thoughts?
> >
> >--
> >*Raymond Aug?* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
> > (@rotty3000)
> >Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
> > (@Liferay)
> >Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
> (@OSGiAlliance)
> >-------------- next part --------------
> >An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >URL: <
> http://mail.osgi.org/pipermail/osgi-dev/attachments/20150828/53b82483/attachment-0001.html
> >
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >Message: 2
> >Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:55:39 -0400
> >From: Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com>
> >To: OSGi Developer Mail List <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
> >Subject: [osgi-dev] creating default instances from service factories
> >Message-ID:
> >       <
> camm6hcccmz51cdpeo98xhznvitpfng+smsxuefzihyqcapc...@mail.gmail.com>
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> >I'm trying to solve a problem for a friend! [tic]
> >
> >He has a factory metatype definition
> >
> >e.g.
> >// still using bnd annotations
> >@Meta.OCD(
> >    factory = true,
> >    id = "the.pid"
> >)
> >
> >He would like 2 distinct configuration instances having specific
> properties
> >set, to be instantiated from this definition "by default" at the start of
> >the framework (of course once all deps are started and so on...)
> >
> >However, I do not like the notion of pragmatically creating the
> >configurations using the config admin API.
> >
> >Is there a more elegant way to do this, preferably using DS?
> >
> >--
> >*Raymond Aug?* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
> > (@rotty3000)
> >Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
> > (@Liferay)
> >Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
> (@OSGiAlliance)
> >-------------- next part --------------
> >An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >URL: <
> http://mail.osgi.org/pipermail/osgi-dev/attachments/20150828/534121f0/attachment-0001.html
> >
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >Message: 3
> >Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:06:37 +0000
> >From: "BJ Hargrave" <hargr...@us.ibm.com>
> >To: osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
> >Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] creating default instances from service
> >       factories
> >Message-ID:
> >       <
> of22f7f48c.f31bf9d4-on00257eaf.00635f97-00257eaf.00637...@notes.na.collabserv.com
> >
> >
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> >An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >URL: <
> http://mail.osgi.org/pipermail/osgi-dev/attachments/20150828/2544020d/attachment-0001.html
> >
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >Message: 4
> >Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:15:31 -0400
> >From: Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com>
> >To: OSGi Developer Mail List <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
> >Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] creating default instances from service
> >       factories
> >Message-ID:
> >       <
> camm6hcahukmysfvo2oy8k95bn4bemo7ds4ewsjzgtyr7k3n...@mail.gmail.com>
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> >On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:06 PM, BJ Hargrave <hargr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> DS does not make configurations. It just uses them.
> >>
> >> Peter has something in enRoute which makes configurations from a
> resource
> >> in a bundle:
> >>
> https://github.com/osgi/osgi.enroute.bundles/tree/master/osgi.enroute.configurer.simple.provider
> >>
> >
> >After speaking with Tom Watson, I think we realized, like you said, it's
> >pretty much what Peter is doing in this enroute impl.
> >
> >Thanks
> >- Ray
> >
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> BJ Hargrave
> >> Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM // office: +1 386 848 1781
> >> OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance // mobile: +1 386 848 3788
> >> hargr...@us.ibm.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original message -----
> >> From: Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com>
> >> Sent by: osgi-dev-boun...@mail.osgi.org
> >> To: OSGi Developer Mail List <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
> >> Cc:
> >> Subject: [osgi-dev] creating default instances from service factories
> >> Date: Fri, Aug 28, 2015 1:56 PM
> >>
> >> I'm trying to solve a problem for a friend! [tic]
> >>
> >> He has a factory metatype definition
> >>
> >> e.g.
> >> // still using bnd annotations
> >> @Meta.OCD(
> >>     factory = true,
> >>     id = "the.pid"
> >> )
> >>
> >> He would like 2 distinct configuration instances having specific
> >> properties set, to be instantiated from this definition "by default" at
> the
> >> start of the framework (of course once all deps are started and so
> on...)
> >>
> >> However, I do not like the notion of pragmatically creating the
> >> configurations using the config admin API.
> >>
> >> Is there a more elegant way to do this, preferably using DS?
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Raymond Aug?* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
> >>  (@rotty3000)
> >> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
> >>  (@Liferay)
> >> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
> >> (@OSGiAlliance)
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OSGi Developer Mail List
> >> osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
> >> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OSGi Developer Mail List
> >> osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
> >> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >*Raymond Aug?* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
> > (@rotty3000)
> >Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
> > (@Liferay)
> >Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
> (@OSGiAlliance)
> >-------------- next part --------------
> >An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >URL: <
> http://mail.osgi.org/pipermail/osgi-dev/attachments/20150828/bdce947a/attachment-0001.html
> >
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >Message: 5
> >Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:39:59 +0200
> >From: Tobias Roeser <le.petit....@web.de>
> >To: OSGi Developer Mail List <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
> >Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] IRC etc.
> >Message-ID: <201508282139.59594.le.petit....@web.de>
> >Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-15"
> >
> >There is already a #OSGi channel on freenode (since 2008 I guess). :-)
> >
> >But it is almost empty.
> >
> >Am Freitag, 28. August 2015, 19:34:17 schrieb Raymond Auge:
> >| Hello everyone,
> >|
> >| Would anyone be interested in having a real time channel about osgi? I'm
> >| thinking an IRC channel on freenode, or a gitter room on the
> >| github.com/osgi project or something like that.
> >|
> >| Thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OSGi Developer Mail List
> >osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
> >https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
> >
> >End of osgi-dev Digest, Vol 106, Issue 16
> >*****************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSGi Developer Mail List
> osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to