As stated in the front matter of the RFC, you should provide feedback to the OSGi public bugzilla system at https://osgi.org/bugzilla/.
Thanks,
--
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM // office: +1 386 848 1781
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance // mobile: +1 386 848 3788
hargr...@us.ibm.com
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM // office: +1 386 848 1781
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance // mobile: +1 386 848 3788
hargr...@us.ibm.com
----- Original message -----
From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com>
Sent by: osgi-dev-boun...@mail.osgi.org
To: OSGi Developer Mail List <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
Cc:
Subject: [osgi-dev] Basic feedback on JAX-RS whiteboard spec
Date: Thu, Nov 10, 2016 12:29 PM
Hi,
Sorry if it is not the right place to provide the feedback, I just
wanted to share some basic feedback.
- The text is written well and is easy to understand
- May be worth distinguishing between PreMatch and PostMatch filters -
the former are run before a resource method has been found
- JAX-RS 2.1 draft introduces a client support for CompletableFuture or
other alternatives (such as RxJava) via an rx() as opposed to async()
bridge, with an RxInvoker wrapping a specific Rx library/code.
- The use of List<String> in the examples - the minor issue is that it
is generally difficult to write an interoperable code in such cases for
XML formats - every JAX-RS 2.0 impl or List handler may have its own
idea on what the root name is.
That is it
Cheers, Sergey
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
