Peter Kriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry, the description was not updated. The program started out in > the way described but then nobody wanted to use the variant, they > wanted to just created the XML. Due to some complications I decided > to rip out that functionality.
As always, trust the code, not the documentation, and in this case the "usage" options didn't look like they could support the unimplemented archive mode. > If you want, I can take a look at restoring it. Well, the part I was most intrigued by addressed the file naming problem. Your documentation hinted that there can be problems with file names that the program aimed to solve. Can you sketch what its intended behavior was or would have been? > However, maybe it is easier then to make a program that reads the > XML and creates the ZIP. Perhaps, though it is bindex that already has the list of all the files and processes each one, so it is in a better position to create such an archive, but I do concede that separating these concerns would be cleaner. -- Steven E. Harris _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
