http://www.isn.ethz.ch/news/sw/details.cfm?ID=10022
EU deals to secure Iran's nuclear cooperation The concern in Tehran is that compromise with the EU over Iran's nuclear program could be interpreted in Washington as a sign of weakness that invites aggressive action. By Ardeshir Moaveni for EurasiaNet (26/10/04) Iran has sent mixed signals on a EU proposal, under which Tehran would abandon efforts to develop nuclear weapons in return for greater cooperation in the nuclear-energy sphere and expanded trade opportunities. Analysts in Tehran believe that Iranian officials are waiting to see the results of the US presidential election on 2 November before formulating a response. The EU's Big Three - Britain, France, and Germany - have given Iran until 25 November to accept their proposal, which some analysts have characterized as a combination of "carrots and sticks". The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) earlier set a 25 November deadline for Iran to resolve outstanding issues concerning Tehran's nuclear research efforts. Iranian officials insist that the country's nuclear program is designed solely to meet civilian-sector needs. The EU and the US, however, remain concerned that Iran seeks to develop nuclear weapons. The EU Three deal The EU Three deal hinges on Iran's agreement to give up efforts to develop a fuel cycle - activities that are often associated with efforts to produce weapons-grade nuclear components. In return for the "indefinite suspension" of fuel-enrichment plans, the EU would provide far-ranging assistance to promote the recovery of Iran's sclerotic economy. The deal was discussed during a 21 October meeting between EU representatives and Iranian officials. An expert familiar with those talks told EurasiaNet that EU aid would focus on the civil aviation, agricultural, domestic transport and biotechnology sectors. Brussels also would support Iranian efforts to join the World Trade Organization, and would provide technology for monitoring seismic trends and forecasting earthquakes. In addition, the Europeans would assist Iran in developing its nuclear energy potential, providing technology that would enable Tehran build "light-water" reactors, and ensuring access to nuclear fuel to make those reactors run. Conversely, Iran would be required to abandon hopes of building a "heavy-water" reactor, which can be used to accelerate the process of developing weapons-grade nuclear fuel. The step-by-step penalty plan An Iranian Foreign Ministry representative initially characterized the proposal as "unbalanced". But on 25 October, government spokesman Abdollah Ramezanzadeh dismissed Western reports that Iran had rejected the EU offer. Ramezanzadeh stressed that negotiations would continue, adding that a compromise was "achievable", the official IRNA news agency reported. "In two-sided negotiations, there are always suggestions that are partly acceptable and partly not. ... We acknowledge the international community's concerns about nuclear weapons proliferation, but we also feel obliged not to concede our legitimate right [to fuel-cycle development]," Ramezanzadeh said. If Iran does not budge on the EU's fundamental fuel-cycle demand, Brussels is prepared to endorse a series of punitive measures. During the 21 October meeting, EU representatives presented Iranian authorities with a detailed plan that provided for "incremental" punishment. The step-by-step penalty plan would culminate in UN Security Council action to tighten economic sanctions against Tehran. The decision-making calculus There are signs that Tehran has already factored potential Security Council sanctions into its decision-making calculus. The Financial Times on 25 October quoted Hossein Mousavian, a member of Iran's National Security Council, as saying Tehran is no longer afraid of possible Security Council censure. Ramezanzadeh, the government spokesman, also sounded a defiant note. "The international community knows well that threats against Iran are not effective, and we hope our negotiating partners will never resort to forceful language," IRNA quoted him as saying. The new conservative majority that has taken control of Iran's political establishment feels that international sanctions could provide domestic political benefits, helping to rally Iranians around the hardliner banner, some analysts maintain. Other experts familiar with Iran's nuclear program believe that Tehran is unlikely to abandon fuel-cycle development efforts, saying the country's security strategy counts on possession of a nuclear shield. Iranian officials would also be reluctant to waste the considerable resources - in terms of both money and manpower - expended so far on its nuclear program, the experts suggest. Regime change? The Iranian political establishment maintains that the country's nuclear program meets the research terms as outlined in the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The pact allows countries to enrich uranium and to obtain nuclear technology from outside sources. Iran's nuclear ambitions appear to be driven in part by lingering concern that the Bush administration, should it secure re-election in the presidential vote 2 November, might revive attempts to promote "regime change" in Iran. Some experts say US hostility dampens Iran's desire to compromise on the nuclear issue. The concern in Tehran is that compromise with the EU could be interpreted in Washington as a sign of weakness that invites aggressive action. "If we accept their [EU] demands, the United States would exert more and more pressure on us," the Iran-based Fars news agency quoted political scientist Ghadir Abyaneh as saying. "Their [US officials'] ultimate goal is nothing but the complete destruction of the Islamic republic." Is Iran stalling on a response? Some Iranian experts believe that Iran is stalling on a response until after the US presidential vote, apparently in the belief that a possible change in US administrations could be beneficial for Tehran. Others, citing John Kerry's public criticism of Iran, doubt that US policy towards Tehran would ease significantly in the event the democratic challenger captures the White House. A few observers suggest that Tehran may be delaying a response while probing for ways to drive a wedge between the EU and US on the Iranian nuclear issue. David Albright, president of the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security, said that Iran "would be crazy to turn down" the EU offer. If "Iran signs on to this [the EU deal], there would be tremendous pressure on the US administration to follow the wishes of the world community, and not try to change the regime in Iran." Ardeshir Moaveni is a freelance journalist specializing in Iranian politics. EurasiaNet (www.eurasianet.org)provides information and analysis about political, economic, environmental, and social developments in the countries of Central Asia and the Caucasus, as well as in Russia, the Middle East, and Southwest Asia. The website presents a variety of perspectives on contemporary developments, utilizing a network of correspondents based both in the West and in the region. The aim of EurasiaNet is to promote informed decision making among policy makers, as well as broadening interest in the region among the general public. EurasiaNet is operated by the Central Eurasia Project of the Open Society Institute. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
