<http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20050105-083004-6885r>
The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com
Curious case of Somaliland
By Richard W. Rahn
Published January 6, 2005
What is Somaliland? Don't be embarrassed if you don't know. Very few people
know, and that is the beginning of the problem. Somaliland is not Somalia,
but is a part of what used to be Somalia -- and it may or may not be an
independent country. As you may recall, Somalia was the country in which
the famous "Black Hawk down" incident (and later movie) occurred.
Somaliland is on the Horn of Africa, surrounded by Somalia, Ethiopia,
Djibouti and the Gulf of Aden.
First, a little history: In the days when Africa was controlled by
European colonists, there were three contiguous Somalias: French Somalia
now known as Djibouti; British Somalia now known as Somaliland (but only by
the Somalilanders); and Italian Somalia, now known as Somalia. In 1960,
British Somaliland was granted independence, and was immediately recognized
by 35 countries. Five days after British Somaliland became independent,
Italian Somaliland also became independent, and the two merged into the
Somalia Republic.
The merger did not go well, but the country did hang together until
1969 when a military coup installed Gen. Mohammed Siad Barre as president.
The Somalilanders chafed under the brutal rule of Barre, and they
eventually developed an opposition movement to get rid of the Barre
government.
A full-scale civil war developed by 1988 that resulted in the deaths
of more than 20,000 people and great devastation in Somaliland due to
government bombing. The Barre government fell in 1991. Somaliland declared
itself independent, and the rest of Somalia came under the control of
various warlords. The resulting conflicts and starvation led to the U.S.
intervention during the Clinton administration and then hasty withdrawal
because of unexpected U.S. casualties amid continued chaos.
To this day, Somalia remains a failed state whose government is only
recognized by a handful of countries (all African). Anarchy is an apt
description of the state of affairs in Somalia.
Meanwhile, Somaliland worked its way toward creating a real government
and at least a recognizable (if not perfect) democracy. In 2001, Somaliland
held a referendum that approved a constitution and reaffirmed its
independence. Ninety-seven percent of the voters approved the constitution,
and two-thirds of eligible voters participated.
There was a very close election in 2003 that the president only won by
80 votes (shades of Florida in 2000). The U.S. Independent Republican
Institute (IRI), supported by the National Endowment for Democracy, has
been assisting Somalilanders and their institutions in building a real
democratic structure for the country -- even though the United States and
all other countries have not recognized Somaliland.
Here we have a black African, moderate Islamic country with has a
positive attitude toward the West, that protects women's rights, is willing
to help in the war on terrorism, and is slowly building democratic and free
market institutions, which is what we say we want. Yet, again it is
important to repeat that no country has recognized Somaliland. How ironic.
What is the problem? Somaliland's population is about 3.5 million,
which makes it almost as large as Ireland. Its land area is as large as
England and Wales (or Tennessee). It has oil and mineral resources, some
good agricultural lands, and a good port. The problem is geopolitical
reality. The U.S. and Britain are
reluctant to recognize Somaliland before some of its African
neighbors, because it is a breakaway state. Most African rulers are very
reluctant to begin changing the borders of African countries because they
fear where it might lead, even though they realize most of the borders were
created arbitrarily by European colonialists. Though Somalia has no
functional government, many Somalis argue Somaliland is part of Somalia.
The Somalilanders ask why they must remain part of a dysfunctional
state. Before the colonial period, there was no Somalia state, and
Somaliland was under British rule for 80 years. They argue their situation
is not really all that different from the Baltic States or the now
independent countries that made up the former Yugoslavia. Without
diplomatic recognition, Somaliland cannot join international trade
organizations and has difficulty attracting foreign investment.
The danger for the U.S., Britain and the other Western countries is
their failure to recognize Somaliland will gain influence and power for
radical Muslim elements there. Somaliland might be pulled back into the
morass of Somalia, a terrorist breeding ground.
American diplomats by nature tend to be cautious and are reluctant to
appear to be rewarding breakaway states in Africa. However, it is the
judgment of some of the diplomatic "Africa hands," who know the situation
best, that the benefits of recognizing Somaliland far outweigh the
potential costs of continued nonrecognition. The Bush and Blair
administrations should come together and immediately recognize Somaliland
to reward them for pursuing a constructive path toward free market
democracy. If we do so, I would bet that, within a year, most other nations
will have followed our lead.
Richard W. Rahn is a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute and an
adjunct scholar of the Cato Institute.
--
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Give underprivileged students the materials they need to learn.
Bring education to life by funding a specific classroom project.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FHLuJD/_WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
