<http://www.theglobalist.com/DBWeb/printStoryId.aspx?StoryId=4341>

The Globalist

 

Globalist Bookshelf  >  Global Society
 Civilization and Its Enemies
 


By Lee Harris | Friday, January 21, 2005
 

 Early in the 21st century, the United States finds itself in a tough
position. It is hated by its enemies - and even its friends are often wary
of U.S. motives. Lee Harris - author of "Civilization and Its Enemies" -
argues that it is not America's conservative traditions, but its tolerance
and multicultural heritage that have predestined it to be the first among
equals in defending civilization everywhere.


The United States is uniquely equipped to act as the new sovereign in the
world today, not simply because of its power - but because of its tolerance.

 The power of multiculturalism

The very multiculturalism that causes concern among many conservatives -
far from weakening the United States' position - has made it a historically
unprecedented microcosm of the rest of the world.

We Americans are feared not because of who we are - but what we are. We act
on behalf of all people to make the community around them more open, more
tolerant, more trusting.

Its diversity reflects that of the world - and this means that for the
first time in world history, a great power is genuinely capable of
transcending the limitations to human cooperation imposed by divisions
along the lines of race, sect and ethnicity.

 That the United States is a practical design for the next stage of human
history - a utopia that works - is a remarkable achievement.

 It is the appalling historical insensitivity on the part of the Left that
makes them bind to the world-historical significance of this fact.

 Cosmopolitan ideal

The great American cultural revolution that began in the 1960s - and which,
like all such events had ennobling and appalling episodes - has produced,
through no one's design, an America that embodies the cosmopolitan ideal
far more than any other society in human history.

 Those who still wish to give their allegiance to a purely hypothetical
community of all the men and women on the planet are not only indulging in
a fantasy, they are being downright reactionary.

 The problem of power

By failing to support the United States in its effort to offer liberal
values to the rest of the world, the liberal cosmopolitans betray both
liberalism and the cosmopolitan impulse - that is, the desire to treat all
human beings as of equal moral worth regardless of any accident by birth.

After this juncture in history, it is in the interest of civilization,
wherever it is found, to keep the legitimacy of Pax Americana intact.

Instead, they prefer to place their hopes in the fantasy of a community
that will never exist, because it could never exist.

 The burden with which any U.S. president and any administration will be
saddled into in the foreseeable future is the horrible problem of being the
dominant power in the contemporary world.That world has every reason to be
fearful and distrustful of any power at all, much less the staggering
degree of power that the United States currently possesses.

 In short, we Americans are feared not because of who we are - but what we are.

 The feared Americans

It is absurd to think that the world should inevitably be jumping up and
down with joy that there is one overwhelmingly dominant nation.

 That is true even if you happen to believe - as I do - that there has
never been a nation whose track record of humanity and generosity can even
come close to matching our own.

 Defending all civilization

On the one hand, we do have too much power. On the other, we cannot have
any less. This is the paradox that not only we must somehow learn to live
with - but so must the world.

For the first time in world history, a great power is genuinely capable of
transcending the limitations to human cooperation imposed by divisions
along the lines of race, sect and ethnicity.

The civilization that the United States is now called upon to defend is not
America's or even the 'West's - it is the civilization created by all men
and women, everywhere on the planet.

 We act on behalf of all people who have worked to make the actual
community around them less addicted to violence, more open, more tolerant,
more trusting. Civilization, in this sense, is Chinese, American, African,
European and Muslim.

 Those who are working for this purpose are all on the same side - and we
all have a common enemy. It is an enemy whose origin goes back to the dawn
of history.

 Fighting a common enemy

And indeed, it is the enemy that began the whole bloody and relentless
cycle of violence and war - the eternal gang of ruthless men.

 Someone must be prepared to fight them whenever they threaten to enter
history and threaten thereby to change even the very possibilities in terms
of which we are - forever after - doomed to imagine our future.

 First among equals

After this juncture in history, it is in the interest of civilization,
wherever it is found, to keep the legitimacy of Pax Americana intact.

The United States is uniquely equipped to act as the new sovereign in the
world today, not simply because of its power - but because of its tolerance.

But the United States cannot permit itself to become the arrogant empire
that its critics fear - or, indeed, an empire of whatever kind. It must be
first, but first among equals.

 It must adopt the psychological finesse of a George Washington - that is
to say, a style of leadership where the leader is far more concerned with
preserving consensus among his followers than with asserting his authority
over them.

 An issue of trust

We must do so not because consensus is good in itself, but because it is an
indispensable precondition of strong leadership.

 If the leader is not trusted by those whom he must lead, he will be
incapable of exercising the kind of leadership that is most necessary in a
time of crisis and peril. He will not be permitted to act unilaterally and
at his own discretion.

 Fighting ruthlessness

For the foreseeable future, the United States must reserve the option of
acting precisely in this manner, unilaterally and at its own discretion.
This it must do not to subvert the rules of international liberalism, but
to uphold them.

Today, those ruthless gangs are Muslim - but there is no reason why this
will be true 20 years or two years hence.

Otherwise, the geopolitical system supported by these rules will collapse,
as would any other trust system that has lost its mooring in its
traditional code of honor.

 In the epoch we have entered, some agency must have the capacity to act
quickly, decisively - and with overwhelming strength in order to keep
ruthless gangs from charting the course of the next stage of history.

 Cultural diversity

Today those ruthless gangs are Muslim - but there is no reason why this
will be true 20 years or two years hence. But in whatever incarnation such
ruthlessness appears, it must not be allowed to decide the direction of
mankind's future development.

 During the course of its history, America has devised a unique solution to
the fundamental problem of politics - that of figuring out how to get
people to cooperate with each other - and it has done this with an
extraordinary diversity of ethnic groupings.

 Learning from America

If cultural diversity has a genuine value - which it most certainly does -
its value lies in the objective superiority that different cultures have
over each other.

The United States must reserve the option of acting unilaterally and at its
own discretion -not to subvert the rules of international liberalism, but
to uphold them.

What would be the point of looking sympathetically at someone else's
culture, if all we could learn from it is how to live better within our
own? And if it makes sense for us to learn from others, doesn't it make
equal sense for them to learn from us?

 To force other cultures to stay permanently in the cake of custom imposed
by the tradition of their ancestors is a perverse way of expressing
appreciation for their humanity. It is, on the contrary, to treat them like
curiosities in a museum of natural history, like those waxwork tableaux.

 But hard though it may be, we have to do much better than to show the
casual visitor a typical scene of daily life among Paleolithic hunters of
early Sumerians.



 Adapted from CIVILIZATION AND ITS ENEMIES by Lee Harris. Copyright © 2004
by Lee Harris. Reprinted by permission of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources 
often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EHLuJD/.WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to