http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/02/15
/MNGISBB3FO1.DTL

 

Iraq's
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/02/1
5/MNGISBB3FO1.DTL>  Shiites unlikely to be Iran's proxies 
Electoral victory may not boost Tehran's influence 
- Borzou Daragahi, Chronicle Foreign Service
Tuesday, February 15, 2005 

 

Tehran -- To hard-line cleric Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, every vote cast in
Iraq's election was a "big 'no' to the U.S." 

The United States "has no option but to leave that country in shame" now
that a coalition led by Shiite clerics and former exile groups with close
ties to Iran has emerged victorious, said Maj. Gen. Rahim-Safavi, head of
Iran's Revolutionary Guards. 

While the Bush administration sees Iraq's election as a vindication for the
March 2003 invasion, Iranian conservatives see it as the first step toward
getting U.S. troops out of the Persian Gulf region -- and greater influence
over its neighbor. 

"Free and balanced elections help Iraq get back its sovereignty, and that
will be the best guarantee to end the foreign occupation," said an Iranian
diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "This will lead the region
toward calm and development." 

Rhetoric aside, even nongovernmental observers have applauded the outcome. 

"Across the political spectrum the results are being perceived as positive,"
said Nasser Hadian, a professor of political science at the University of
Tehran. "The general feeling is that there's going to be a friendly
government in Baghdad." 

At first glance, the ties between Iran and the new government in Iraq are
close. Iran sheltered Shiite and Kurdish exile groups who opposed Saddam
Hussein. The Iranian government's clerical leaders maintain contact with
colleagues in the Iraqi shrine cities of Najaf and Karbala, considered
Shiite Islam's most holy sites. 

Nearly 70 percent of the 60,000 expatriate Iraqis who cast ballots in Iran
voted for the United Iraqi Alliance, the winning Shiite coalition. Political
ads for the alliance ran on state-controlled Iranian television. 

But the ties may be less binding than they appear. 

"The Iraqis have their own identity, and they're not going to follow the
Iranian style," said Adnan Ali al-Kadhimi, an official of Iraq's Dawa party,
one of the two main groups making up the victorious Shiite coalition. 

Regional experts say Iranians may be sorely disappointed if they expect the
Shiite parties taking control of the government next door to act as Iranian
proxies. 

"Shia Iraqis are themselves deeply ambivalent about Iran and Iranian
influence in Iraq and can't be relied on to act in Iran's interests," said
Simon Kitchen, Middle East analyst for Eurasia Group, a political risk
consultancy based in New York. 

Or, as Abbas Maleki, a former Iranian diplomat put it: "They're Arabs. We're
not." 

Iranian commentators also worry that Iraq's inexperienced Shiite political
leadership might mishandle the violent insurgency that has been driven
largely by the Sunni Arab minority's unhappiness at losing the power it has
historically held in Iraq. 

The new constitution, Hassan Hanizadeh wrote in the conservative Tehran
Times, "must observe (Sunni Arab) rights in order to decrease the growing
differences." 

The underlying worry is that a prolongation of the violence could keep U. S.
troops in Iraq and the region indefinitely. 

"Even the conservatives are concerned about pushing the Sunni Arab minority
into an even stronger stance of rejectionism, and so have urged the Shiite
majority to act inclusively," said Juan Cole, a Middle East expert at the
University of Michigan. 

Making some Iranians equally nervous is Kurdish talk about creating a
federal Iraq with semiautonomous regions. "Federalism in Iraq would benefit
Israel," said Maleki. "If Iraq were to fragment into separate entities, one
of the countries might be drawn to Israel," he said. 

Either way, Iran is facing a dilemma, say some analysts. While an Iraq
that's too chaotic might keep U.S. troops in the region, one that's too
peaceful, prosperous and democratic could embolden Washington hawks who see
Iran as the next front in the war on terror. 

Hadian dismisses the concern. 

"The rhetorical tension (between Washington and Tehran) is going higher. but
there are not a lot of military options for the U.S. to exercise," he said.
"The general perception is that there is more psychological warfare on the
part of Americans." 

Page A - 6 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources 
often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EHLuJD/.WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to