<http://www.townhall.com/columnists/CarolineGlick/printcg20050319.shtml>

Townhall.com

Sharon's terror masters
Caroline B. Glick (back to web version) | Send

March 19, 2005

During the course of his negotiations with Damascus-based Palestinian
terror masters in Cairo this week, PA chieftain Mahmoud Abbas made two
revealing statements.

 First, on Tuesday, Abbas said that upon receiving security control of
Jericho from the Israel Defense Force, he would release from custody all of
the Palestinian terrorists who have been incarcerated there since May 2002.
Those terrorists, who were transferred to Jericho from Yasser Arafat's
Ramallah headquarters as part of a British and US deal with Israel, include
the assassins who murdered Israel's tourism minister Rehavam Ze'evi in
October 2001 and Fuad Shubaki, the PA's chief arms purchaser who oversaw
the Karine A terror weapons ship purchase from Iran that was intercepted by
Israeli commandos on the Red Sea in January 2002.

 On Wednesday, Abbas went a step further. He told the terror masters who
are now based in Damascus that after the exit of Israeli forces and
civilians from Gaza and the transfer of control over the international
border with Egypt to the PLO, they would all be invited to move their
headquarters to the Gaza Strip.

 That is, Abbas said that in the aftermath of the implementation of Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's plan to forcibly expel 8,000 Jews from their
homes and end all IDF counterterror operations inside Gaza, Abbas will
respond by transforming it into a base for global terrorism. This offer can
be viewed as particularly credible given that it was made in the presence
of Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Walid Mualem, whose government is now
facing increasing international condemnation for enabling these global
terrorists to operate in its capital.

 Surprisingly, the Israeli government reacted with near hysteria to Abbas's
statement about releasing the terrorists in Jericho. Government members and
spokesmen took to the microphones immediately after Abbas's statement was
published and said that if he dared to free Ze'evi's killers, Israel would
contemplate ending the peace process and hunt them down.

 The government's reaction was frankly inexplicable, given that Sharon and
his fellows have given credence to Abbas's demand that Israel release all
Palestinian terrorists from its jails. Acting on this demand, the
government has already released 500 terrorists from prison and is planning
on springing another 400 in short order.

 Indeed, every single demand that Abbas has made on Israel, like every step
he has taken to placate the various Palestinian terror groups, has been met
with understanding by Israel. Israel has accepted his policy - practically
if not publicly - of taking absolutely no action against any terror
organizations, leaders or infrastructures.

 After all, if it hadn't, the government would not be transferring security
responsibility over Palestinian population centers to the PA as it did in
Jericho the day after Abbas's statement about the prisoner release.

 Israel has accepted Abbas's demand that it stop trying to catch terror
fugitives. Israel has accepted his demand that it allow the Palestinian
mass murderers who violently took over the Church of the Nativity in April
2002 to return to Bethlehem from their European exile and receive amnesty
for their crimes.

 The government has made no protest against Abbas's order to execute 15
Palestinians who are accused of having helped our security forces fight
Palestinian terrorists. And Israel has made no protest over the fact that
according to IDF sources, wanted Palestinian terrorists are being sheltered
in Abbas's offices in Ramallah.

 Given all of this, why should the government care if Abbas lets Ze'evi's
murderers and Shubaki leave Jericho? As it stands, their incarceration has
been a farce. Journalists have reported repeatedly since their transfer to
Jericho of their relative freedom within the compound. More than being
imprisoned, they are being sheltered there from Israeli forces.

 Of course the answer is public opinion. The Israeli public would simply
not accept such a concession by the government and it would fall.

 Given the government's fear of the public, it becomes clear why it is that
Israel's leaders have been mute about Abbas's declared intention to turn
Gaza into a new Afghanistan.

 Since Sharon announced his withdrawal and expulsion plan last year, the
point has been made repeatedly that the only thing that prevents Gaza from
becoming a capital of global terrorism is the IDF troops stationed there
and controlling the international border with Egypt.

 Last summer Maj.-Gen. (res.) Doron Almog, who headed Israel's Southern
Command from 2000 to 2003, wrote in the Middle East Quarterly that if
Israel transferred control of Gaza's border with Egypt to the Egyptians or
Palestinians, Gaza would become a "mini-Afghanistan."

 Former director of Military Intelligence Research and Assessment
Department Maj.-Gen. (res.) Ya'acov Amidror has warned repeatedly since
Sharon unveiled his plan that in the absence of the IDF, Gaza would become
a focal point for global terror groups from Hizbullah to al-Qaida.

 Sharon has ignored all such warnings, has fired cabinet ministers and cut
short the service of the IDF's Chief of General Staff and the head of the
Shin Bet security agency who have doubted the wisdom of his withdrawal
policies and he has plowed ahead, demonizing and criminalizing his
detractors.

 So what do we expect Sharon to do now that Abbas has announced his
intention to prove all Sharon's critics correct? The only thing he can do,
if he wishes to continue to force through his plan, is to keep his head
down and hope that no one notices what is happening. In this bid he is
being ably assisted - to the point of ostensible collusion - by the Israeli
media.

 Not only has the government made no comment on Abbas's offer to move
global terror masters from Damascus to Gaza, but the Israeli media, to
their shame, have had a near complete blackout on the issue. None of the
television stations mentioned it in their news broadcasts Wednesday night.
None of Thursday's newspapers had any report of it. Israel Radio devoted
less than one minute of laconic coverage to Abbas's offer 10 minutes before
the end of its two-hour-long morning news magazine Thursday morning.

 Israel's overwhelmingly left-wing media's lockstep support for Sharon's
withdrawal plan is being matched by the support Sharon is enjoying from the
left wing of the American Jewish community.

 According to a report this week in The Forward newspaper, Americans for
Peace Now, like the Israel Policy Forum, two of the most left wing groups
on the American Jewish political and organizational spectrum, are now
actively colluding with the Israeli Embassy in Washington and consulates
throughout the US to combat opposition to Sharon's policies among American
Jews and American Christian supporters of Israel.

 On Monday, Ambassador Danny Ayalon participated in a forum on Capitol Hill
sponsored by American Friends of Peace Now together with the PLO
representative to Washington and the Jordanian and Egyptian ambassadors. In
June, Vice Premier Ehud Olmert is scheduled to be the keynote speaker at
the Israel Policy Forum's annual dinner.

 In an interview with The Forward, Arye Mekel, the consul-general in New
York, said that neutralizing opponents to Sharon's withdrawal policy is
"the No. 1 priority on the agenda of the consulates at the moment, and it's
the task that is keeping me the busiest."

 In their discussions in Cairo, the various terror chieftains have been
employing the explicit vocabulary of jihad to describe their various
positions. On Thursday, Islamic Jihad and Hamas reportedly accepted the
idea of a "thahadiya" or a temporary cessation of attacks for a defined
time period. In jihad rhetoric, the purpose of a "thahadiya" is to regroup
to enable the forces of jihad to fight their infidel enemy more
successfully in the next round. The significance of the resort to
jihad-speak has been completely ignored by the Israeli politicians and
commentators praising Abbas's policy of mainstreaming violent terror
organizations.

 One of the most absurd aspects of the Cairo discussions as a whole is that
in all its concessions to the Palestinians since Abbas replaced Yasser
Arafat last November, Israel has justified its moves to the public and to
the Americans as payback to Abbas for his achievement of a cease-fire with
the terrorists. And yet, if he already has a cease-fire agreement, why is
he negotiating one now? And again, if he is a peaceable man, why is he
employing the language of jihad together with leaders of Hamas and Islamic
Jihad?

 And further, why is Egypt being praised by Israel and the US for hosting
this terror parley, whose clear aim is to legitimize terror and whose
direct result is Abbas's offer to turn Gaza - where Egypt has supposedly
agreed to block terrorists from entering after Israel withdraws - into an
epicenter of global terrorism?

 Unfortunately, the answer to all of these questions - unasked by the
Israeli media - is internal Israeli politics. Once Sharon abandoned his
natural support base and preferred instead the embrace of the Left, he has
boxed himself into a situation where he can do nothing except advance the
Left's agenda of appeasing terrorists.

 In moving down this road, Sharon, like Yitzhak Rabin and Ehud Barak before
him, rendered his political fortunes completely dependent on the whims of
the terrorists. As a result, he cannot admit that what Abbas is doing is
not simply antithetical to peace but also manifests a strategic threat to
Israel's security - and indeed, to global security. If Sharon were to tell
Israelis the truth about Abbas and his terrorist chums or about their
Egyptian sponsors, he would be admitting that all his detractors in his own
political camp were right all along.

 Given this state of affairs, the inevitable conclusion is that the only
thing left for the Israeli public to do is to demand new general elections.

 With Sharon now fully committed to a policy that is manifestly dangerous
to the state, he must be replaced by a leader who has not so committed
himself. It is the only chance that Israel has to prevent the establishment
of a new base for global terror on the outskirts of Ashkelon.

 Caroline B. Glick is the senior Middle East fellow at the Center for
Security Policy in Washington, D.C., and the deputy managing editor of The
Jerusalem Post, where this article first appeared.
-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for
anyone who cares about public education!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to