At 11:50 AM -0500 3/24/05, OpinionJournal wrote:
>'I Just Feel So Bitter'
>http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/vpr/news.newsmain?action=article&ARTICLE_ID=753169
>
>
>Remember Jim Jeffords? Neither do we, but he's the U.S. senator from
>Vermont who achieved historical-footnote status in 2001 when he left the
>Republican Party and handed control of the Senate to Democrats for a
>little over 19 months. Yesterday Vermont Public Radio interviewed Jeffords
>and, we're guessing, reminded Republicans of why they're glad to be rid of
>him:
>
>*** QUOTE ***
>
>Host: Sen. Jim Jeffords says he won't be surprised if the Bush
>administration launches a war with Iran next year. Speaking Tuesday night
>on VPR's "Switchboard" program, Jeffords says he remains convinced that
>president Bush went to war in Iraq in order to control that country's oil
>supply and to bolster the president's chances of winning re-election to a
>second term.
>
>Jeffords: I think it was all done to get--all that's the end result is
>going to be some oil agreement and the loss of life that we had. And the
>cost of it, to many was just a re-election move and they're going to try
>to live off it and probably start another war. Wouldn't be surprised next
>year, probably in Iran.
>
>Host: Jeffords says he fears that President Bush will use the same tactics
>to invade Iran in the coming year.
>
>Jeffords: I just feel so bitter about the thinking that's gone on behind
>them and the reasons they go to war, went to war. But I feel very strongly
>that they're looking ahead and there will be an opportunity to go into
>Iran.
>
>Host: Jeffords says nothing has happened in Iraq that justifies the Bush
>administration's decision to go to war in that country. He says he'll
>strongly oppose efforts to expand the war to Iran.
>
>*** END QUOTE ***
>
>So let's see if we have this straight: According to Jeffords, the
>president went to war in Iraq to "control the country's oil supply" and to
>help his own re-election chances. This doesn't quite jibe with what
>happened, which is that Bush was re-elected even though Iraq's oil
>industry, which America doesn't control at any rate, is operating at far
>from full capacity and U.S. gasoline prices are quite high compared with
>recent years.
>
>"Nothing has happened" to justify "the Bush administration's decision"
>(actually it was Congress's) to go to war. Apparently Jeffords hasn't
>heard about the Iraqi elections. Oh, and now he thinks the administration
>is making plans to "go into Iran." Why? To get their oil and help Bush get
>re-elected again?
>
>Between this guy and Howard Dean, Vermont has become a laughingstock, the
>Mississippi of the 21st century.

-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for
anyone who cares about public education!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to