<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/09/opinion/09sat1.html?th=&emc=th&pagewanted=print&position=>

The New York Times
April 9, 2005
EDITORIAL

Terrorist Attacks on Reactor Pools

A report just released by the National Academy of Sciences bears two
disturbing revelations. The cooling pools for nuclear waste at some reactor
sites may be far more vulnerable to a devastating attack by terrorists than
federal regulators are willing to admit. And the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission is operating in a hermetically sealed cocoon that makes it
difficult for anyone - even the academy, armed with a Congressional mandate
- to tell whether the public is adequately protected.

The academy was brought into the fray after a group of scientists,
analyzing reports published by the regulatory commission itself, issued a
report suggesting that a terrorist attack could crack the pools that hold
used nuclear fuel at reactor sites, thereby causing a leak of cooling water
and setting off fires that could unleash radioactive plumes worse than
those at Chernobyl. In asking for the study, Congress directed the
regulatory commission and other federal agencies to provide the information
the academy needed. That proved to be wishful thinking. The academy got
only part of what it needed and was denied the rest on security grounds.

Even so, the academy was able to penetrate the myth put out by the
regulators and the nuclear industry that spent-fuel pools at reactor sites
pose an extremely low risk. In a report made public on Wednesday, a panel
of experts assembled by the academy concluded that several types of
credible terrorist attacks, using planes, truck bombs or a ground assault
with advanced weapons, might be able to release large quantities of
radioactive material into the environment. The likely contamination would
not be on the scale of Chernobyl, panelists say, but it could be severe.
The plants thought to be most vulnerable are those with above-ground pools
in buildings not shielded behind other structures.

To reduce the potential for radiation-releasing fires, the panel suggested
that plant operators reposition the spent-fuel assemblies in their pools to
minimize the buildup of heat and, where warranted, install water-spray
systems to cool the spent fuel should the pools be drained. It also called
for an evaluation of each plant's vulnerability and suggested that, if the
results justified it, the commission might want to speed up the removal of
spent fuel from the cooling pools into dry casks, where the likelihood of
major releases would be less.

The commission pooh-poohed the report even before it was released,
suggesting that the academy overstated the risks, that the pools themselves
are robust structures and that if water leaked out and the fuel overheated,
a couple of fire hoses could save the day. That seems too glib, given the
academy's acknowledged expertise and presumed objectivity.

It is disturbing that the commission, in the name of national security,
denied the academy the information needed to assess the effectiveness of
security improvements instituted since 9/11, refused to brief the panel on
what kinds of threats it was prepared to guard against and slowed the
release of this unclassified version of a classified report with endless
fights over what could be said publicly. In general, the agency gave the
academy what it needed to assess the physical vulnerability of spent-fuel
pools but little of the information needed to assess the readiness of plant
guards and technicians to hold off attackers and mitigate any damage they
might cause. The commission is apparently now ready to supply additional
information, but the lesson of this sorry episode is clear. The next time
Congress asks for a National Academy of Sciences report, it needs to ensure
that the agencies whose performance will be evaluated cooperate more fully.

-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give underprivileged students the materials they need to learn. 
Bring education to life by funding a specific classroom project.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FHLuJD/_WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to