<http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/printbs20050413.shtml>

Townhall.com

Sharon leading Israel into civil war
Ben Shapiro (back to web version) | Send

April 13, 2005

According to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, Israel is on the brink of
disaster. "The tension here, the atmosphere here looks like the eve of the
civil war," Sharon told NBC. "All my life I was defending life of Jews. Now
for the first time, steps I'm taking to protect me from Jews."[sic]

  The latest chaos in Israel stems from Sharon's bullheaded, dangerous
decision to force 9,000 Jews from their homes in the Gaza Strip. Despite a
May 2004 referendum by the governing Likud Party barring Sharon from
pushing out the Jewish residents of Gaza, Sharon has forced his will on the
Israeli Knesset. Just two weeks ago, Sharon won a major political victory
when the Knesset voted to reject a national referendum on the Gaza
"pullout."

  Capitulation is apparently Sharon's strategy for a stronger Israel. At
least that's what he told the media at his April 11 joint news conference
with President Bush: "The process of this disengagement will strengthen
Israel, improve the quality of life for Israeli citizens, reduce the
friction between us and the Palestinians, and can pave the way toward the
implementation of the road map."

  Moshe Feiglin of Manhigut Yehudit, a bloc within Likud that provides
Sharon's main political opposition, was audibly angered by both Sharon's
"civil war" statement and his obvious power grab. He told me on Tuesday
that he is no longer interested "in listening to Sharon. Sharon proved that
words mean nothing to him Š Sharon arranged the referendum in Likud,
obligated himself to the results, and then threw them away, and the only
explanation he gave was 'It was a mistake.'"

 As Feiglin explained, Sharon has brought Israel to the boiling point --
complaining about it now is no more than "George Orwell '1984' Newspeak Š
In Sharon's world, peace means war, and democracy means dictatorship Š
Sharon, who is holding the power, who is dictating the state, who has all
the responsibility for the direction it goes -- he is the man who is
blaming the opposition for his acts, the simple civilians for the results.
Another typical symptom of a dictator."

 There's no mistaking Sharon's "disengagement plan" for anything other than
simple surrender. Disengagement is a far nicer term than surrender, but
both provide the same incentives for Israel's Arab enemies: incentives to
violence, terror and murder. As Feiglin put it, this is "Oslo times 10. The
Oslo direction brought a river of bloodshed on the country, forced the
State of Israel on a death march, and increased terrorism in Israel,
throughout the Middle East and throughout the world. And we can all just
sit and imagine the results now if that was the result of Oslo Š The
difference is that we know this time there won't be any peace. We can't
fool ourselves this time. In Ashkelon and in Ashdod, cities that are north
of Gaza in Israel, just 20 miles south of Tel Aviv, they're already
preparing civil defense against the rain of Qassam missiles that will fall
after the disengagement occurs. This is Oslo without the lie of hope. We
all know that the king is naked. We're not trying to fool ourselves that
he's dressed. But we're running away anyhow."

  Is it any wonder that Israel is on the verge of civil war? The purpose of
effective national government and collective defense is to ensure the
security of territorial extremities. As John Jay explains in Federalist No.
4: "Leave America divided into 13 or, if you please, into three or four
independent governments -- what armies could they raise and pay -- what
fleets could they ever hope to have? If one was attacked, would the others
fly to its succor, and spend their blood and money in its defense? Would
there be no danger of their being flattered into neutrality by specious
promises, or seduced by a too great fondness for peace to decline hazarding
their tranquility and present safety for the sake of neighbors ... Although
such conduct would not be wise, it would, nevertheless, be natural Š it is
not improbable that what has so often happened would, under similar
circumstances, happen again."

 Yet Israel, which purports to have both collective defense and an
effective national government, continually sacrifices its borders for the
chimera of peace. Instead of security, they have reaped bloodshed. Right
now, Sharon's refusal to support the brave Jews who face Arab mortars in
Gaza may seem prudent. But will the same logic hold when Arab terrorists,
emboldened by capitulation, begin firing Qassams into Tel Aviv?

-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give underprivileged students the materials they need to learn. 
Bring education to life by funding a specific classroom project.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FHLuJD/_WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to