Terrorism? Naah . . .

by Robert Spencer
Posted May 5, 2005

 Last Friday, firefighters conducting a routine inspection in a Brooklyn
supermarket found 200 automobile airbags and a room lined with posters of
Osama bin Laden and beheadings in Iraq. An element in the airbags can be
used to make pipe bombs. The owner of the building, according to the New
York Post, "served jail time in the late 1970s and early 1980s for arson,
reckless endangerment, weapons possession and conspiracy, according to the
records." But officials were definite: this has nothing to do with
terrorism. 

It doesn't? What does it have to do with, then? Was this a local Rotary Club
chapter that decided to sell pipe bombs as a fundraiser and thought that a
few posters of Osama and Iraqi beheadings might liven things up?

Similarly, when explosions killed fifteen people and injured over 100 at an
oil refinery in Texas City, Texas, on March 23, 2005, the FBI quickly ruled
out terrorism as a possible cause. When a group calling itself Qaeda
al-Jihad and another Islamic group both claimed responsibility, the FBI was
still dismissive. But then it came to light that investigators did not even
visit the blast site until eight days after the explosions -- and eight days
after they ruled out terrorism as a possibility. One more independent-minded
investigator asked, "How do you rule out one possibility when you don't have
any idea what the cause is?" Still later came the revelation that initial
reports of a single blast were inaccurate: there were as many as five
different explosions at the refinery. 

It may still be possible that these blasts were accidental and that five
distinct things went wrong at the refinery to cause five separate explosions
at around the same time. And maybe there was no terrorist involvement. But
how did the FBI know that before even investigating?

These are just two examples of a consistent pattern. Last Thursday, federal
authorities revealed the existence of a three-state scam that enabled over
two thousand illegal immigrants to get driver's licenses. Michael Garcia,
Assistant Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, explained: "With
a valid driver's license, you establish an identity. There's no way to
identify whether that identity is valid -- that you're not on a terrorist
watch list, that you're not a criminal. It gives you a bona fide." However,
although he did not explain how he could be sure that no jihad terrorists
obtained any of the fake licenses, he assured reporters that this case had
no connection to terrorism.

Daniel Pipes has recently pointed out that denial and obfuscation of obvious
terror-related cases has been going on for years. When a Muslim named El
Sayyid Nosair murdered Israeli political activist Meir Kahane in New York
City on November 5, 1990, authorities ascribed the killing not to jihad but
to Nosair's depression. On March 1, 1994 on the Brooklyn Bridge, a Muslim
named Rashid Baz started shooting at a van filled with Hasidic boys,
murdering one of them. The FBI blandly ascribed the shooting to "road rage."
On July 4, 2002, at the Los Angeles International Airport counter of El Al,
the Israeli national airline, a Muslim named Hesham Mohamed Ali Hadayet
started shooting at people. He killed two. The FBI initially said that
"there's nothing to indicate terrorism." However, after it came to light
that Hadayet may have been involved with Al-Qaeda and was known for his
hatred for Israel, the FBI finally did classify this as a terrorist act. 

Most Americans do not realize that such incidents are taking place on
American soil after 9/11. Are officials trying not to alarm the American
public? Or is this a politically correct strategy born of the success that
canny American Muslim advocacy groups have had in portraying themselves as
victims since 9/11: are officials trying to protect innocent Muslims from
backlash? 

Whatever their motivations, they are keeping Americans in the dark about the
true nature and extent of the jihadist terror threat in our own country. The
consequences of that can only be negative. 


Copyright C 2004 HUMAN EVENTS. All Rights Reserved

http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?print=yes&id=7352



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for
anyone who cares about public education!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to