http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20050716/TORA
TTACK16/National/Idx
 

Is Toronto Prepared for a Terrorist Attack?

 

By JOE FRIESEN AND KATIE ROOK 

Saturday, July 16, 2005 Page A11
<http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/Page/document/hubsv3/tgamHub?searchT
ext=page%3DA11+and+sortdate%3D20050716&searchDateType=searchDateRange&sort=S
core%2Csortdate%2Csorttime&hub=SearchAdvanced&searchType=Advanced&from_date=
20050716&to_date=20050716>  Key
<http://images.theglobeandmail.com/imagesv3/icons/subkey_sm.gif> 

        
 
<http://adcounter.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/AdletCounter?ad1=GAMstory_TPNa
tional_300x250> 

At the end of the day, I don't know how you can prevent all this from
happening. There's things you can do reasonably, and people are trying to do
the best they can, but it's never enough and it never will be enough in this
new world, this new norm that we live in.'

Julian Fantino, Ontario commissioner of emergency management

TTC

Even before the suicide attacks on London's Underground last week, Toronto's
subway was routinely referred to as the likeliest target for terrorists,
should they strike in Canada. 

 
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;18217755;6958408;x?http://www.trumptoronto.ca
/Landing.aspx?src=gm1n>
<http://adcounter.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/AdletCounter?ad1=talon_120x90_
18217755> 

Since Sept. 11, 2001, the city has undertaken several studies to improve
safety underground, but still lags behind major cities like London, New York
and Washington.

There have been additional installations of closed-circuit security cameras,
which now number more than 800. Rick Ducharme, chief general manager of the
TTC, said the effectiveness of the cameras is due more to their location,
rather than how many are in place. He said that not all of the cameras are
watched all the time, but all of them are taped. 

Unlike the London Underground, however, the cameras are not sophisticated
enough to automatically detect unusual movements and pedestrian patterns. 

Mr. Ducharme said the system relies on its customers and employees to stay
alert for anything suspicious. The TTC employs 70 special constables, but
only 15 or 20 would be on duty at a peak time, he said. 

To augment their presence, uniformed Toronto Police officers are encouraged
by their supervisors to use the TTC as much as possible when travelling to
appointments.

Metal garbage cans, which disappeared long ago in the U.K. after the IRA
used them to conceal bombs, will soon be phased out in favour of clear
plastic bags for trash and recycling.

PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

The Greater Toronto Airports Authority won't comment on security changes
since Sept. 11, 2001, for fear of providing the wrong people with
information, says Connie Turner, a spokeswoman for the agency.

Ms. Turner said, however, that emergency procedures are reviewed regularly. 

After last week's bombings in London, canine-unit patrols were increased at
Pearson and there was greater vigilance about unattended baggage.

The most significant change to airport security began in April of 2002 when
the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority took over all preboarding
baggage screening from airlines. 

With an operating budget of $1.9-billion over five years, the agency hired
800 additional personnel for the federally funded program, spokeswoman Renée
Fairweather said. 

Every screening officer must complete a 180-hour training course that covers
topics ranging from customer service to the use of technology. 

Although employees are contracted from various security firms, their
performance is rated according to national standards. 

Transport Canada conducts criminal background checks in concert with the
RCMP and CSIS, spokeswoman Julie Iannetta said.

The Canadian Air Transport Security Authority also introduced
explosive-detection trace machines at airports across the country to test
passengers' carry-on baggage. Items are swabbed, identifying the presence of
an explosive substance within seconds. 

Since 2002, the agency claims to have recovered more than one million
prohibited items -- ranging from tweezers to guns, knives and other weapons
used in martial arts, Ms. Fairweather said. 

Both the federal and the Toronto authorities are able to conduct random spot
checks of people who have already passed through security, including
passengers, airport employees, vendors and concessionaires.

According to Gunnar Kuepper, an aviation-terrorism expert from Los Angeles
who attended this week's disaster-management conference in Toronto, access
to tarmac and airfield sites has been significantly curtailed at airports
around the world since 9/11. 

At airports in the United Kingdom and the United States, for example,
delivery trucks cannot enter the premises without registered identification
and freight. 

All deliveries to Pearson International Airport are made to one site where
they are repackaged and delivered throughout the airport, Ms. Turner said.

While EDT machines are laudable, Mr. Kuepper is concerned they are not
ubiquitous.

Airports need to take greater advantage of the technologies that could
prevent terrorist attacks, he said, citing as an example new technology that
allows planes to be flown from the ground -- without pilots. This technology
is advantageous for stopping terrorists from flying planes into targets. 

The technology would allow planes to be landed the moment ground control was
notified of distress, he said.

TORONTO HARBOUR

Everything has changed in Toronto harbour since Sept. 11, 2001, Angus
Armstrong, harbour master and head of security for the Port of Toronto,
said. 

The first priority was to put fences up around any international pier to
restrict access to the cargo-loading areas and to make mandatory
identification cards and security badges for employees.

Fears were also raised that ship-borne cargo containers, few of which are
ever inspected, could be used to transport arms for a terrorist attack, or
even material for a dirty bomb. Mr. Armstrong compares the task of examining
containers to searching every passenger on the TTC. 

"If you suddenly stopped and tried to look inside every container, you would
literally slow the economy down to a crawl."

Most ships that arrive in Toronto, however, have cleared security at either
Halifax or Montreal. Those ports are equipped with more sophisticated
equipment, such as a large radiation-detecting gateway that monitors the
radiation levels in the containers as they are unloaded onto trucks. Ships
docking in Toronto mainly carry bulk cargo such as sugar, cement or steel,
which Mr. Armstrong described as relatively easy to check.

Even before Sept. 11, 2001, the Toronto harbour denied entry to ships
originating from certain ports, many of them in Africa, with poor security
and inspection records. Nor does it allow entry to ships carrying dangerous
cargo such as oil or liquid natural gas, for fear that an accident or
terrorist act could trigger a large explosion.

PICKERING NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear facilities are often mentioned as possible terrorist targets because
they are ready-made weapons of mass destruction. A successful attack could
create an ecological disaster comparable to what occurred after the reactor
meltdown in Chernobyl. Untold numbers of citizens would die in the explosion
and later from radiation sickness or cancer, and the Pickering plant is only
about 30 kilometres from Toronto.

John O'Dacre, senior security adviser for the Canadian Nuclear Safety
Commission, said his organization moved quickly after Sept. 11, 2001, to
upgrade security at all facilities across the country. At Pickering,
concrete barriers have been put in place to guard against a truck-borne
suicide attack and armed response units are on-site at all times.Enhanced
security screening for employees, such as CSIS and criminal background
checks, have also been put in place for all employees and contractors who
work in the protected area, the sector of the plant closest to the reactor. 

A training program for supervisors was also created to teach them how to
detect unusual or changing behavioural patterns in their employees that
might indicate some kind of plot.

After the attacks in 2001, the CNSC considered placing anti-aircraft
missiles at Pickering, which is close to the Pearson Airport flight path, in
case of a hijacking. But it was decided that with the air force able to
scramble CF-18s from nearby Canadian Forces Base Trenton, missiles were not
necessary.

WATER SUPPLY

The greatest threat to Toronto's water supply is not a poison attack but an
explosion that would disrupt service, said Patrick Newland, the city's
director of water treatment and supply.

"Our water infrastructure is so large and it would take such a large amount
of toxic chemical to be adverse to human health that it is a minimal risk,"
he said. Since Sept. 11, 2001, the city has spent $2.5-million improving
security at its four water treatment plants and more than 30 other water
facilities. Closed-circuit surveillance, monitored by the city's corporate
security, has been put in place, as have regular patrols by security and
police. CSIS has also been brought in to consult on how to mitigate the risk
to the water supply.

David Parsons, head of an Australian water safety advisory group who
attended an emergency preparedness conference here this week, said Toronto
is on the right track. But he cautioned that even though a widespread
contamination is very difficult to achieve, a small-scale attack could have
devastating economic and psychological consequences.

Striking further down the line of water supply, by getting in to the system
at a tap or hydrant and pumping a contaminant such as cyanide back into the
pipes, is a strategy that has been investigated by terrorists, he said. The
United States is investing in research that would monitor water for
contaminants as it moves through the system, but, at the moment, most
utilities can test only chlorine levels.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to