"Nearly three years after 9-11, after all the shake-ups and pledges to
reform, we finally were inside Al Qaeda. Then the White House steps in
and wrecks the operation. All in the interest of Bush's re-election."

So there is the real answer to the Bush43 placement of priority on the
war on terror.  Reelection came in higher priority than successfully
exploiting a turned Al Qaeda HUMINT resource to track down Bin Laden
and his chief lieutenants.

David Bier

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0531,mondo1,66448,6.html

Mondo Washington
The Wrath About Khan
Plame's not the first spy outed by the Bush team. Remember the case of
the Pakistani computer tech?
 
by James Ridgeway
August 2nd, 2005 12:03 PM 
 
Last month's bombing of the London subways brought back memories of a
botched spy plot in August 2004 in which the Bush administration
unaccountably outed the only double agent we ever had inside Al Qaeda. 
Working with British and Pakistani intelligence, this man was sending
e-mails back and forth to the Al Qaeda network in Britain. He was a
highly placed, trusted lieutenant who had been turned. Once his name
was revealed by the White House, Al Qaeda people disappeared into the
woodwork. The outing infuriated the Brit cops who had been working to
nail down the Al Qaeda network in the U.K. before it could launch an
attack. 

Like the Plame-Wilson saga, last year's plot was entangled in
politics. The story goes like this: Around the time of the Democratic
National Convention, the Bush campaign was trying to upstage new
Democratic nominee John Kerry and show the president to be a
fearlessâ€"and successfulâ€"fighter against terrorism. In early August,
just as Kerry was setting off on his campaign, U.S. officials leaked
news of the arrest in Lahore, Pakistan, of Muhammad Naeem Noor Khan, a
young Pakistani computer expert. 

Pakistani officials told the Associated Press that reports in the
"Western media" about Khan's capture let other Al Qaeda operatives
flee. "Let me say that this intelligence leak jeopardized our plan and
some al-Qaida suspects ran away," said one official. Khan was arrested
July 13, 2004; his arrest was reported in American papers on August 2,
a day after reporters in D.C. learned of it. Pakistani intelligence
officials told the Associated Press at the time, "Khan led authorities
to Ahmed Khalfan Ghailaniâ€"a Tanzanian with a $25 million American
bounty on his head for his suspected involvement in the 1998 bombings
of U.S. embassies in East Africaâ€"and the capture of about 20 other
al-Qaida suspects." The arrests were followed by raids in Britain. 

The Pakistanis diplomatically attributed the source of the leak to
"coalition partners." However, after New York senator Charles Schumer
asked the White House to explain why Khan's name was given to
reporters, Condoleezza Rice, at the time the national security
adviser, explained that Khan was outed "on background," which means
the information could be published but not attributed. The AP reported
at the time: "Officials say Ghailani and Khan's computer contained
photographs of potential targets in the United States and Britain,
including London's Heathrow Airport and underpasses beneath London
buildings." 

In its investigation of the intelligence community's operations
leading up to 9-11, the congressional joint inquiry led by then
senator Bob Graham concluded that the U.S. never had penetrated Al
Qaeda. This was surprising, because John Walker Lindh and several
other young American recruits walked right in and mixed with the Al
Qaeda leadership with little trouble. 

Nearly three years after 9-11, after all the shake-ups and pledges to
reform, we finally were inside Al Qaeda. Then the White House steps in
and wrecks the operation. All in the interest of Bush's re-election. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GLOWING REPORT ON THE NEW BILL 

Last week's energy legislation is unlikely to reduce prices or
increase production. But it will take another step in jump-starting
the moribund nuclear power industry and give the government authority
to override local opposition to dangerous liquefied natural-gas
processing plants on both coasts. The measure sidesteps mandatory fuel
emissions standards and opens the way for greater fuel monopoly. And
it is a barrel of pork. 

Three outstanding rip-offs: 

Allows U.S.-produced plutonium on the world market. That opens the
door to more nuclear weapon production around the globe. Current U.S.
policy bans export of weapons-grade uranium unless and until the
buyers start to convert their nuclear power plants to a less dangerous
form of uranium. The new bill's changed provisions are largely due to
lobbyists for a trade organization called the Alpine Group, which is
promoting nuclear medicine. The chief beneficiary, reports The
Washington Post, is the world's largest producer of medical isotopes,
a Canadian company called MDS Nordion, which makes isotopes for
treating cancer, heart disease, and epilepsy. Currently there is no
shortage of medical isotopes, and none is in sight. But there are
plenty of terrorists who might very well like to get their hands on
nuclear materials. Alpine Group lobbyists have contributed $25,000 to
members of both houses' energy committees, and other nuclear medicine
groups have given tens of thousands more. Furthers energy
deregulationâ€"what's left of the regulations, anywayâ€"by repealing the
Public Utility Holding Company Act, the FDR-era mechanism that sought
to undo monopoly among electric utilities. For decades, nonutilities,
such as oil companies or investment banks, have been forbidden to own
utilities. Now the repeal opens the way for a surge of takeovers. 

The new measure also provides financial incentives to electric
utilities to sell their power lines to so-called regional transmission
organizations. These RTOs are a hot-ticket item in the energy business
in the post-Enron era. One dominant player is Goldman Sachs, already
supplying much of the power to New York City through ownership of
regional power plants, Reliant Energy, and others. "RTOs allow these
companies to more easily move power from cheaper regions of the
country," says Public Citizen, "and sell it in higher-priced
regionsâ€"without any guarantee that prices will be reduced for
consumers, but with a guarantee that these energy companies will enjoy
higher profits." 

Sets up a $1.5 billion fund for drilling research into
"Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum
Resources," which, according to California Democrat Henry Waxman,
directly benefits Bush cronies and Tom DeLay's district. The money
goes to a highly profitable industry. One prediction is that oil and
gas net income will reach $230 billion this year. These people don't
need any more handouts. It is a thinly disguised con, appearing to
support arcane research techniques. In fact, the language in the bill
would allow an oil or gas company to apply for funds for a wide
variety of activities, including those involving "innovative
exploration and production techniques" or "enhanced recovery
techniques." According to the legislative language the government is
to ladle out the money through a "contract with a corporation that is
constructed as a consortium." The leading contender for this contract
appears to be the Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America
(RPSEA), housed in the Texas Energy Center in Sugar Land, Texas.
Halliburton is a member of RPSEA and sits on the board, as does
Marathon Oil. The consortium can keep up to 10 percent of the fundsâ€"a
fee of more than $100 million in this case, according to Waxman. 

In a letter to House Speaker Dennis Hastert last Wednesday, Waxman
wrote, "The provision was inserted into the energy legislation after
the conference was closed, so members of the conference committee had
no opportunity to consider or reject this measure. Before the final
energy legislation is brought to the House floor, this provision
should be deleted." 

Needless to say, DeLay, the congressman from Sugar Land, promptly lost
it. "Henry Waxman knows zero about Texas," said DeLay spokesperson
Kevin Madden. "Zero about energy security, and apparently even less
about how a bill becomes law." 

"This is a good bill," White House spokesman Scott McClellan told
reporters after the energy measure passed the House. "This legislation
will help us reduce our dependence on foreign sources of energy and
help address the root causes that have led to high energy prices." 

Will it bring down gas prices? "Well," said McClellan, "we didn't get
into this overnight, and we're not going to get out of it overnight." 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

STEADY THERE, BIG BOY 

"It's a little bit like biblical Pharisees, you know, who basically
are always trying to undermine Jesus Christ. . . . You know, it goes
on the same way. If they can catch him in something, they can then
criticize and the outside groups will go berserk." That was Utah
Republican senator Orrin Hatch on July 21, describing to Fox News the
nature of potential Democratic opposition to Supreme Court nominee
Judge John Roberts. 






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12h9ort6l/M=362329.6886306.7839369.3040540/D=groups/S=1705323667:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123176170/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/*http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992
">Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to