http://www.insidebayarea.com/ci_2921495?rss
Rogue Guards tap spy center
Secret unit, created without orders or budget, infiltrated state's
anti-terror operation Ian Hoffman and Sean Holstege, STAFF WRITERS

Soon after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the California National Guard
sent a captain with a top-secret clearance inside the state's civilian
anti-terror intelligence center, the first of several California guardsmen
to venture into the world of domestic intelligence analysis.
But last summer top Guard commander Maj. Gen. Thomas Eres had a grander
vision: He would create his own military "Information Synchronization
Center" to pull together intelligence from the military's classified network
and law-enforcement intelligence networks.

Guard documents described it as an intelligence outfit "on steroids,"
feeding up-to-the-minute threat information to senior Guard officers.

In a February memo, Eres said the information would be used in "preparation
of operations against threats directed against the United States, the State
of California, and their citizens and resources."

State Senate Budget Committee chairman Joe Dunn, the Ocean Grove Democrat
who is investigating the intelligence plans,said the Guard was stopped just
in time.

"I think what happened here is, if this unit and the involvement of the
California Military Department went unchecked for another 12 months they
would have been deep within surveillance activity on California citizens,"
Dunn said.

Eres had no orders from the Defense Department or approval from the state
Legislature, and he used money cloaked as pay for regular troops, Guard
insiders allege. As a state Senate investigation unfolds, the official line
is that Eres acted in relative isolation.

But new Guard documents show the military worked closely with the California
Anti-Terror Information Center from the beginning. With the tacit oversight
of Gov. Gray Davis' office and Attorney General Bill Lockyer, a growing
number of uniformed Guard officers worked side-by-side with state and local
law enforcement intelligence analysts.

"We do not and have not maintained a domestic surveillance unit with the
department, nor have done any surveillance of Californians as recently
alleged," said California National Guard spokesman Col. David Baldwin. "We
do not maintain illegal files on Californians or any other U.S. persons."

To his knowledge, repeated routine audits by the Army have found no
violations of any rules regulating how the Guard shares intelligence.

The soldiers' missions evolved from developing statewide target lists to
"predictive" intelligence, under direction from the governor's terrorism
advisers.

In large measure, the soldiers try to predict a terrorist attack by keeping
a database of suspicious and extraordinary events around likely California
terrorist targets. It is full of reports of people photographing bridges or
driving around refineries at odd hours, but with all names, license plate
numbers and other identifiers stripped out.

Officials at the Guard and CATIC, now revamped and renamed the State Terror
Threat Assessment Center, say the soldiers do not spy on Californians and
abide by state attorney general's guidelines that forbid collecting
information on any U.S. citizen without a reasonable suspicion of criminal
activity.

Lockyer spokesman Tom Dresslar said the Guard soldiers, known as the
Predictive Indicators Analysis Unit, "have nothing to do with" Eres' new
intelligence center, though they are in the same command.

"If any member of the Guard in the PIAU were engaged in human intelligence
gathering, that would be outside the boundaries, way outside the boundaries,
of their duties at STTAC. It would be cause for seriously grave concern for
the attorney general," Dresslar said.

The revelation that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's press office and National
Guard intelligence commanders shared an e-mail notification of a Mother's
Day protest by peace groups, first reported by the San Jose Mercury News,
prompted Dunn to launch an investigation.

The e-mails were reminiscent of an April 2003 bulletin by CATIC analysts,
warning of possible violence at an upcoming anti-war protest at the Port of
Oakland. It turned violent when police fired wooden dowels into the crowd.

Two years later, a top Guard commander received a heads-up e-mail about the
Mother's Day protest from the governor's office and passed it to several
Guard officers.

He wrote that he would forward the information "to our intel folks who
continue to monitor." But Guard officials said he apparently was referring
to regular operations personnel who watched TV news reports on the protest.

Eres stepped down, and his newly hired chief of intelligence fusion, Col.
Robert O'Neil retired.

Dunn predicts investigators will find misappropriation of state or federal
money.

Eres' attempts to create a state military intelligence system took flight
when he hired O'Neil and took advantage of the National Guard's often
confusing hybrid role as a state and federal agency.

"They play the seams," Dunn said, to stave off state and federal scrutiny.

When the Pentagon calls up Guard troops for deployment to places like Iraq,
Guard insiders say it frees up their state-paid salaries. Normally, the
Guard would back-fill those positions. But Eres used the money instead to
hire O'Neil, Guard officers said.

Last summer Guard officers prepared a budget request for the new
intelligence system, as Eres saw it. It sought $8.7 million to hire 41
officers and enlisted troops, including 11 to form the Information
Synchronization Group.

Eres never forwarded the request. Guard documents show that O'Neil was
salaried at $147,000, although that figure is not accounted for in the state
budget.


Contact Ian Hoffman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sean Holstege at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hbo62t1/M=362329.6886306.7839369.3040540/D=groups/S=1705323667:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123433385/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/*http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992
">Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to