"It seems almost as if a nuclear weapon went off in New Orleans," said
George Friedman, chairman of Strategic Forecasting Inc. "The
displacement of the population is the crisis that New Orleans faces. .
. . The physical and business processes of a port cannot occur in a
ghost town, and right now, that is what New Orleans is."

Our economy is in the process of taking a huge hit.  Aside from the
energy sector (are you enjoying over $3 fuel?), farming and
manufacturing will take giant hits because New Orleans port is dead
and will be for months.  Farmers are harvesting grain, soybean and
corn crops that normally are barged down rivers to New Orleans for
export but now must sell all domestically or pay tremendous shipping
costs to move crops by rail or truck to other ports and suffer losses.
 All of the manufacturing jobs that hinge on New Orleans port for raw
materials and shipment of products are at risk.  

Mr. Bush, you took $250 million for levees, pumps and flood control
away from the New Orleans area and spent it on Iraq.  And a big chunk
of FEMA's budget for disaster response you instead spent on Iraq and
homeland security.  Now American taxpayers, at least those of us who
did not benefit from those tax cuts for the rich, must pay billions to
recover, New Orleans is just as dead as if a nuclear bomb hit it,
thousands of its people are dead with the rest dispersed to the four
winds. and the only outcome for about 80% of New Orleans is a new life
as a hazardous waste Superfund site.

And you are wafting eloquent about Katrina removing all the old stuff
so we can have a "fantastic Gulf Coast".

David Bier

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/02/AR2005090202468.html

washingtonpost.com
Storm's Economic Shock, Job Losses Likely to Rival Worst

By Nell Henderson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, September 3, 2005; D01

Hurricane Katrina, by forcing an exodus of workers and families from
New Orleans and surrounding areas, appears likely to rank alongside
Sept. 11, 2001, and the Arab oil embargo of 1973 as one of the
nation's most serious and sudden economic shocks -- particularly in
terms of job losses -- in recent memory.

Before the storm, the Mobile, Ala., Biloxi, Miss., and New Orleans
metropolitan areas supported about 1 million non-farm jobs, with about
600,000 of them in New Orleans. Analysts at Stone & McCarthy Research
Associates estimated yesterday that the storm has wiped out several
hundred thousand jobs along the Gulf of Mexico coast, at least
temporarily.

"It seems almost as if a nuclear weapon went off in New Orleans," said
George Friedman, chairman of Strategic Forecasting Inc. "The
displacement of the population is the crisis that New Orleans faces. .
. . The physical and business processes of a port cannot occur in a
ghost town, and right now, that is what New Orleans is."

Yesterday, the people remaining in the city were predominantly
emergency aid workers, law enforcement officers and people waiting to
be evacuated. The workforce that once operated the region's oil rigs,
refineries, ports and other businesses is now widely dispersed. The
result could be a labor force crisis that delays the eventual economic
recovery.

In comparison, in recent years, the biggest one-month drop in the U.S.
national job-count occurred when 377,000 employees lost work in
October 2001, after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. And the last time
more than 600,000 jobs were lost nationally was in December 1974,
during the recession that followed the 1973 oil embargo.

Soon after Katrina hit, surging gasoline prices were already prompting
consumers to curtail their spending on other items. That may cause
businesses to cut back on hiring and investment, probably slowing
economic growth in coming months. The slump's severity will depend
critically on consumer psychology, analysts said yesterday: A panicky
response to climbing gas prices would help drive them up higher,
making things worse.

"This disaster is unleashing the type of energy supply shock that we
had viewed as the economy's greatest vulnerability," William C.
Dudley, chief U.S. economist for Goldman, Sachs & Co. said yesterday.

Katrina's impact on the national economy will worsen if rising gas
prices cause employers to hold off hiring or to cut jobs because of
slowing demand, weakening the national labor market.

"The worst-case scenario is if the drop in consumer spending leads to
sufficient job losses to push the unemployment rate materially
higher," Dudley said.

The hurricane hit as the U.S. economy was rolling along at full steam,
little affected by oil prices that had roughly doubled in the past two
years to around $65 a barrel and gasoline prices that had topped $2 a
gallon nationally. Consumer and business spending was rising and
employers were adding jobs at a healthy clip. The Labor Department
reported yesterday that the nation's unemployment rate fell to 4.9
percent last month, the lowest level in four years.

Just a week ago, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said the
economy had thus far weathered "reasonably well the steep rise" in
energy prices over the past two years.

By yesterday, as gas prices exceeded $3 a gallon in many areas, images
of motorists waiting in line to buy gas conjured memories for many
adults of the worst times in the 1970s, when sharp reductions in oil
supplies helped send inflation and interest rates soaring,
contributing to deep recessions.

Forecasters do not foresee a replay of such turmoil today, largely
because the economy is much more energy-efficient than three decades
ago, and is based more on providing services and less on manufacturing
products. The country requires half as much oil to produce a dollar's
worth of output as it did in the 1970s.

Moreover, the oil shocks of the 1970s came about when suppliers in the
Middle East turned off the taps for political reasons. The current
loss of supply resulted from hurricane damage that will be repaired.

Meanwhile consumers have already started altering their routines in
response to skyrocketing gas prices. A CBS Poll conducted after
Katrina struck and released Thursday found that 70 percent of
Americans said they are driving less because of higher gas prices and
nearly half said they have cut back their other household spending.

One concern for many economists is the vulnerability of consumer
psychology if gas prices keep climbing. If motorists worry that gas
may be unavailable and start hoarding or topping off their tanks
frequently in anticipation of rising prices -- as they did during the
gas shortages of the 1970s -- they will boost demand and push prices
higher.

Many economists expect Katrina's effects to slow economic growth for
several months but to be followed eventually by a reconstruction boom
in the Gulf Coast states. Under this scenario, energy production is
restored, workers return and gas prices recede.

But the economy remains vulnerable, said Ethan Harris, chief U.S.
economist at Lehman Brothers Inc., in an analysis for clients. "The
big risk is a prolonged disruption to the energy markets: a long delay
in recovery of the refineries or extended panic behavior on the part
of consumers."

And the National Weather Service forecast three to five major
hurricanes between August and November -- of which Katrina was the first.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to