http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/10/30/security.deadlines.ap/index.html 
 

Security deadlines missed since 9/11


Some say Congress shares blame with unrealistic requirements



Sunday, October 30, 2005; Posted: 5:52 p.m. EST (22:52 GMT) 


REPORTING REQUIREMENTS


The Homeland Security Department says it faces an extraordinarily high
number of deadlines and requirements: 


--Number of reports the Transportation Security Administration has to
submit: 62. 


--Number of reporting requirements Homeland Security Department has from
Congress: 256. 


--Number of hearings Homeland Security officials participated in between
January 1-October 21: 144. 


--Number of witnesses provided for congressional hearings this year: 184 


--Number of briefings held for Congress: more than 1,700. 


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Bush administration has missed dozens of deadlines
set by Congress after the September 11 attacks for developing ways to
protect airplanes, ships and railways from terrorists.


A plan to defend ships and ports from attack is six months overdue. Rules to
protect air cargo from infiltration by terrorists are two months late. A
study on the cost of giving anti-terrorism training to federal law
enforcement officers who fly commercially was supposed to be done more than
three years ago.

"The incompetence that we recently saw with FEMA's leadership appears to
exist throughout the Homeland Security Department," said Mississippi Rep.
Bennie G. Thompson, top Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee.
"Our nation is still vulnerable."

Congress must share the blame for the department's sluggishness in
protecting commerce and travel from terrorists, according to other
observers.

Lawmakers piled on deadline after deadline for reports, plans and
regulations while the department, created after the 2001 attacks, had to
integrate 22 agencies with 170,000 workers and cope with terrorist threats
and hurricanes.

Those deadlines, sometimes for minor projects, distract the department from
putting in place the most important security measures, experts say. 

The Transportation Security Administration, for example, scrambled to try to
meet a February 15 deadline to ban butane lighters from airplanes, a
precaution that does little to protect airliners, they said.

"You have no ability to prioritize against something like that, and it's
going to take up all your time," said Dan Prieto, homeland security expert
with Harvard's Kennedy School of Government. "The urgent becomes the enemy
of the important."

Thompson said the government has yet to develop a comprehensive plan to
protect roads, bridges, tunnels, power plants, pipelines and dams. He said a
broad plan to protect levees and dams might have helped prevent the New
Orleans levies from being breached.

Homeland Security spokesman Russ Knocke said the department goes to great
lengths to work with Congress. But, he said, "there is an extraordinarily
high number of reporting requirements."

The department has to submit 256 reports to Congress every year, while the
TSA alone has 62 reporting requirements.

"There's a lack of adult leadership on both sides," said James Carafano, a
senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation. 

"The department just doesn't have its act together," he said. "Some of these
deadlines are unrealistic."

The first response to the September 11 hijackings was to prevent terrorists
from taking over airliners with weapons and crashing them into buildings.

It became clear that more needed to be done after suicide bombings of
railways in Madrid, Spain, and London, on a tanker near Yemen and on
airplanes in Russia.

So Congress set more deadlines for more security measures.

Some were met. Many were not.

A law signed by President Bush on November 25, 2002, set a July 1, 2004,
deadline for ships and ports to tighten security amid fears that terrorists
might smuggle nuclear weapons in a cargo container.

The Coast Guard largely accomplished the undertaking. But much still remains
undone: A report on how a grant program for shippers and ports would work is
more than a year late; a report on cargo container security is eight months
overdue; a national security plan for marine transportation is well past its
April 1 due date.

Rep. Harold Rogers, chairman of the House subcommittee that oversees
Homeland Security spending, was unhappy because the TSA missed a March 17
deadline for a plan to deploy bomb-detection machines at airports.

Rogers, a Kentucky Republican, put a provision in the Homeland Security
spending bill, signed into law October 18, that withholds $5 million from
the department until it submits such a plan.

Some security deadlines have been met, especially those set soon after the
September 11 attacks.

Within nine weeks of the hijackings, lawmakers ordered a federal work force
to take over airport security, many more air marshals and the creation of
the TSA.

Congress set 33 deadlines; a press release went out each time one was met.

One of the biggest deadlines was met with great fanfare when the TSA
announced on November 19, 2002, that it had replaced private airport
screeners with a government work force.

The next year, then-TSA chief James Loy told Congress they had met "100
percent of the aviation screening mandates."

The TSA does not make those kind of announcements any more.

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to