http://jamestown.org/terrorism/news/article.php?articleid=2369856 

 

"Mujahideen of the Lowlands" on Trial in the Netherlands

By Judit  <http://jamestown.org/terrorism/analysts.php?authorid=322> Neurink

The trial of 14 young radical Muslims is attracting widespread attention in
Holland and elsewhere. This article examines the network and explains how
young second-generation immigrants are radicalized to pose an unprecedented
security threat to the Dutch state.

Mohammed Bouyeri, who is already serving a life sentence for the murder of
controversial Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh in November 2004, is among the
14 young Muslims whose trial started on 2005 December. All 14 have been
charged with membership in a criminal terrorist organization, the so called
Hofstadgroup (Hofstadt being another name for The Hague), of which Bouyeri
was one of the leading figures.

The Hofstadgroup is mainly comprised of second-generation Dutch youth of
Moroccan descent. Members of the Hofstadgroup were under surveillance by the
Dutch intelligence agency AIVD since 2002. Group members are thought to have
been planning attacks on Dutch politicians and institutions. Houses where
the boys lived were wired, and excerpts of the taped conversations form part
of the evidence against them. Moreover, the contents of their computers and
their postings on radical websites and in Internet chat rooms will also be
used as evidence. 

This small organization has been called the Hofstadgroup because it was in
The Hague where members used to meet. For some time they would gather for
Qur'an meetings at a phone shop in the city. It was here that a number of
them became radicalized after listening to their Qur'an teacher, the Syrian
Abu Khaled, who disappeared just before Bouyeri murdered Van Gogh. Abu
Khaled would show them jihadi videos and convinced them that jihad was an
obligation for "pure" Muslims. Some members traveled to Pakistan, presumably
to attend training camps. They called themselves the Polder Mujahideen, or
Mujahideen of the lowlands.

Apart from Bouyeri, who killed Van Gogh, only two other members of the group
were actually caught in a criminal act. Jason Walker is charged with
throwing hand grenades at the police team that came to arrest him last year,
badly wounding some policemen. Moreover, Nouredine el Fathni was arrested
last June in Amsterdam with a loaded machine gun in his sports bag. Dutch
intelligence had reason to believe he was on his way to assassinate a
politician in Amsterdam. Both he and another of Bouyeri's friends, Samir
Azzouz, provoked a state of high alert among the Dutch security services.
Consequently, special security was put in place for all members of the Dutch
cabinet, the parliament, the buildings of ministries, and Amsterdam's
Schiphol airport.

Their success in discovering and dismantling this network notwithstanding,
the Dutch authorities have made clear there are likely many more similar
networks in operation. Home minister Johan Remkes has claimed that there are
ten to twenty networks of radical Muslims in the Netherlands that have the
propensity to resort to terrorism [1]. Hundreds of people are believed to be
involved and the networks are described as "fluid," as members enter and
leave the organization. Some of the groups are exclusively local, while some
have strong and wide-ranging international contacts.

In order to deter members of these networks from engaging in violence, the
Dutch police have been using what they call "interference," which is
basically overt surveillance. Jason Walker's younger brother Jermaine has
told the press he has been followed by the police ever since he was set free
after the arrest of Jason and other members of the group in November. 

Jermaine Walker is a good example of the problems associated with very young
Muslim radicals who are under the strong influence of older people. He is 18
years old, the son of a Dutch woman and an alcoholic American man who
converted to Islam. Subsequently both his sons became Muslims as well. After
his release, Jermaine became more radical, telling Dutch journalists he
understood Mohammed Bouyeri's murderous assault on Van Gogh: "it was
good.who dares to talk dirty about Islam now? No one!" [2]. 

Samir Azzouz was set free in April after being acquitted by the court (the
appeals court later followed the ruling) of planning attacks on Amsterdam's
Schiphol airport, the parliament and the AIVD building. In his house, police
found maps and fertilizers and chemicals that could be used for bomb-making.
Yet the court decided that evidence of planning alone was not enough to
convict him.

While Azzouz was free he established a new network which included drug
addicts, and tried to turn them into takfiris [3]. Samir Azzouz is the only
known member of the group who has made a video testament, in which he
declares his admiration for Bouyeri, and advises other Muslims that armed
jihad is their duty. When he was arrested again in October, the AIVD
discovered that Azzouz was looking for weapons and explosives. 

Nouredine el Fathni was also building a new network, while he was on the run
from the police after most of the group's members were arrested in November
2004. It appears that Fathni had been giving Qur'an lessons at the house of
a Dutch friend in The Hague. Three girls and a boy were present at three
sessions or more [4]. One of them was a young Muslim girl with whom he had
got married under Islamic law; another was a former girlfriend of Mohammed
Bouyeri. As his knowledge of the Qur'an was negligible, Fathni used his
laptop to read aloud Qur'anic verses and other details about what he called
"pure Islam." The girls were also shown videos of decapitations.

These sessions became known to the police after the girls decided to report
them. They were confused, because Fathni's sermons were radically different
from the ones they had heard at the as-Sunna Mosque in The Hague, which is
known as one of the most radical mosques in the Netherlands. Most members of
the Hofstadgroep frequented this mosque, until they become even more radical
than the Salafist Sheikh Jneid Fawaz who preached at as-Sunna. The girls
initially reported their concerns to Fawaz, who called the takfiri group a
bunch of madmen and advised the girls that they were on the wrong path [5].
Moreover, he urged them to report the matter to the police. The girls took
this as a fatwa, religious guidance that they could not ignore. They
consulted another Salafist imam in Tilburg, who gave them the same advice. 

At the opening of the trial this week, one of the women refused to repeat
her allegations in court, allegedly after receiving threats. The women's
testimony shows the spread of radical thinking between friends, as described
by the American forensic psychiatrist Marc Sageman [6]. Sageman's study of
Islamic terrorists showed that many of them had no religious background, and
became radicalized among a group of people in the same position: in a
foreign country, lonely, homesick and feeling in some way humiliated. The
Hofstadgroup is interesting because it clearly shows the dynamics of the
group as Sageman describes it, and also the attraction of it for other young
people. For even after most of the members had been detained, the group
remained attractive to other young Muslims. While in prison, Bouyeri and
Samir Azzouz found new followers, prompting the authorities to incarcerate
the two young men in solitary confinement. 

Politicians in the Netherlands have called for stronger laws to prevent
people like Samir Azzouz from being acquitted. Dutch law makes it difficult
to try people for their intentions. This problem might arise in the trial of
the Hofstadgroep, which is expected to last for at least two months. The
Dutch parliament is still waiting for the bill Justice Minister Piet Hein
Donner promised last summer, which would make glorification of violence a
crime, thus enabling judicial action against potential jihadis. 

Political opinions are split between left and right over such a bill, with
opposition parliamentary member Femke Halsema strongly against. This law
would really be all about Muslims, she said. "The law seems mainly aimed at
changing the minds of a rebellious group of young people.it will work the
wrong way for this specific group as young people will be affirmed in their
conviction that they are persecuted because of their opinions," she said
[7]. 

Even Justice Minister Piet Hein Donner lately made clear he is not sure that
strengthening the law would be the right step. "Prevention is important in
the case of terror, but the law is made to punish actions.If a judge can
also punish someone for what he is saying or thinking, then you also
undermine the freedom of expression," he said [8]. Freedom of expression
remains a contentious issue in the Netherlands, over a year after the murder
of Theo van Gogh. 

Van Gogh's distasteful verbal attacks on Islam and Muslims and his placement
of Qur'anic texts on a naked woman's body in the film Submission led to his
murder. Many Dutch people feel that the assault on Van Gogh also murdered
freedom of expression in the Netherlands. Yet, some people are also voicing
criticism of Van Gogh's extreme insults against the Islam and Muslims.
Moreover, people feel that the anti-Islamic sentiments that have grown since
Van Gogh's murder are undermining multicultural Dutch society. The trial of
the Hofstadgroep is not only seen as the trying of the Polder Mujahedin, but
a trial for Dutch society as a whole at a time when it is nearly universally
agreed that the terrorist threat is indeed real. 

Notes
1. Ikon TV, interview with Home minister Johan Remkes, July 17, 2005. 
2. NRC Handelsblad: Jermaine Walker gets star treatment, October 15, 2005.
3. "Samir Azzouz recruits criminals," Trouw, November 5, 2005.
4. "How Nourddine El Fathni wanted to form a new group," NRC Handelsblad,
August 6, 2005.
5. "Maneuvering between the law and Allah," NRC Handelsblad, September 19,
2005.
6. Marc Sageman: Understanding Terror Networks, 2004
7. "Donner's law goes too far," Trouw, September 20, 2005
8. Buitenhof TV, interview with Justice Minister Piet Hein Donner, November
20, 2005

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL.  COPYING AND DISSEMINATION
IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/X6CDDD/lzNLAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to