Denmark Tries to Act Against Terrorism as Mood in Europe Shifts
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 66.94.237.42
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 85.18.136.86
From: "gwen831" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Yahoo-Profile: gwen831
Sender: osint@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list osint@yahoogroups.com; contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: mailing list osint@yahoogroups.com
List-Id: <osint.yahoogroups.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:24:09 -0000
Subject: [osint] 
Reply-To: osint@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/28/AR2005082800899_pf.html

Denmark Tries to Act Against Terrorism as Mood in Europe Shifts

Law Raises Concerns of Civil Libertarians
By Kevin Sullivan
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, August 29, 2005; A09

COPENHAGEN -- Said Mansour, a slightly built man with a bushy beard,
believes Muslims have a right to kill Americans in Iraq because, he
said, "This is war; it's not a picnic."

So, he explained in an interview last week, he had no qualms about
downloading and burning CDs of Internet videos depicting beheadings in
Iraq and speeches by Abu Musab Zarqawi, the terrorist mastermind
behind much of the Iraqi insurgency.

Now, Danish police intend to make Mansour, 45, a Moroccan-born Danish
citizen, the first person ever charged under an anti-terrorism law
enacted in 2002 that forbids instigation of terrorism or offering
advice to terrorists. Police sources said Mansour would probably be
charged for distributing CDs that contained the inflammatory jihadist
speeches and gruesome images.

The law contains curbs on free speech that are remarkable in a country
famous for tolerating all points of view. It illustrates how
democracies across Europe are adopting tougher measures in an era of
rising extremist violence, despite protests that civil liberties are
being sacrificed in the process.
The 2004 Madrid train bombings, which killed 191 people, and the
London bombings last month, which killed 56 people, including the four
bombers, have added new urgency to the issue.

"We have to look at reality," said Rikke Hvilshoj, Denmark's minister
of refugee, immigration and integration affairs, noting that some have
abused Denmark's free speech guarantees to encourage violence and
killing. "The day we don't have freedom of speech, the fundamentalists
have won," she said. "On the other hand, we can't be naive."
Experts said the debate about how to balance anti-terrorism
protections with individual freedoms is at the top of the agenda for
European nations. The issue is particularly acute in Denmark, Italy
and Poland -- which have troops in Iraq as part of the U.S.-led
military coalition and fear they could be the next target -- and in
Spain, following the train attacks there.

"The mood has shifted in Europe more toward security than it was
before the London bombings," said Daniel Keohane, senior research
fellow at the Center for European Reform in London. "The Europeans
have always been very nervous about infringing on civil liberties. But
when you experience terrorism, it changes your views."

France, with Europe's largest Muslim community -- 6 million people --
has just announced plans to strengthen its anti-terror laws, already
among Europe's strongest. Britain now plans to ban or deport those who
incite terrorism, close bookshops or places of worship used by radical
groups and criminalize speech that "foments, justifies or glorifies"
terrorism.

Human rights groups and Muslim civic leaders called those measures too
broad.
"What may be seen as a glorification of terrorism by one person might
be seen as an explanation of the causes of terrorism by another
person," said Azzam Tamimi, a senior leader of the Muslim Association
of Britain.
Some political activists here said their government was trampling free
speech guarantees contained in the Danish constitution.

"They have crossed the line," said Naser Khader, 42, a Syrian-born
member of Parliament who has been a vocal critic of Muslim extremists.
"The society must be open and free. If you close it and make a lot of
restrictions, the terrorists get what they want."
But a recent survey found that 80 percent of Danes supported the new
laws to battle terrorism and control immigration. In Britain, 73
percent of people polled by the Guardian newspaper in mid-August said
that they were willing to give up some civil liberties to improve
security.

"The terror is getting closer," said Morten Messerschmidt, a member of
Parliament from the strongly anti-immigration Danish People's Party.
"First it was D.C. and New York, then Madrid and now London. Who's
next? There's no doubt we are in a potential threat situation, and
that scares people."

Messerschmidt said curbing free speech was "very tough and emotional
to do in England or Denmark or any other country that respects
freedom, but it's out of necessity." He said a terror attack in
Denmark was inevitable. "You'd have to live in a fantasy world to
think it won't happen here."
Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen ordered a review of
national laws governing security and civil liberties immediately after
the London bombings. "We must not have a police state and a
surveillance society," he said in a recent radio broadcast. "But we
must not be overindulgent either."

Many European countries have long had laws banning racist hate speech,
an outgrowth of their experiences with Nazi Germany and the Holocaust.
But analysts said Denmark's new speech law, part of a package of
anti-terror laws enacted in the aftermath of the attacks of Sept. 11,
2001, was at the forefront of tougher European laws. The law banning
instigation of terrorism carries a penalty of up to six years in prison.

Denmark's anti-terror laws also ban financing of radical groups and
give police new powers to electronically eavesdrop on suspected
radicals. Danish intelligence officers have also increased what Hans
Jorgen Bonnichsen, commander of the Danish Security Intelligence
Service, called "preventive talks" with potential radicals.

In an interview, Bonnichsen said his officers conduct close
surveillance of suspected radicals and occasionally let them know they
are being watched in order to disrupt their activities. He said
intelligence officers work closely with Danish universities to monitor
foreign-born students and watch for suspicious activity.
"Three years ago, people thought it was terrifying what Denmark was
doing," said Hvilshoj, the immigration affairs minister. But with the
shifting mood in Europe, she said, "that has changed. People are
looking at Denmark differently."

In Denmark, as in much of Europe, fears of terrorism are often
intertwined with concerns about immigration, particularly the
immigration of Muslims. There are about 15 million Muslims living in
the 25 countries of the European Union. Roughly 200,000 of Denmark's
5.4 million people are Muslim.

Rasmussen's right-leaning government was elected in November 2001,
riding a wave of popular anger about rising immigration. Nearly
overnight, the government reversed Denmark's generous immigration
policies, tightening requirements for asylum-seekers and for foreign
residents trying to bring in spouses.

Many Muslims in Demark see racist motives in the government's policies.
"The Danes have a fear of disappearing into the bigger European
ocean," said Ahmed Abu Laban, one of Denmark's most prominent imams.
"They have made immigrants pay the price. Muslims have become the
scapegoat. They think we will undermine their culture and their values."

But police officials said racism had nothing to do with their plan to
charge Mansour under the instigation law.
Mansour, who arrived for an interview in long Muslim robes and
sandals, insisted on praying before speaking to a journalist.

He said he had come to Denmark in 1983 to join a sister who lived
here. He married a Danish woman the next year; they now have four
children who attend public schools. His wife is a public school
teacher, but Mansour said he was unemployed and collected a monthly
government welfare benefit of about $1,800.

Mansour described leading an active life in Danish Muslim circles,
distributing audio recordings and videotapes of peaceful Islamic songs
and stories. He denied being a violent radical, although he said he
was "happy" about the Sept. 11 attacks and admitted he maintained
relationships with well-known radicals from other countries.
He said he had been close friends with Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, the
cleric who was convicted in connection with the 1993 bombing of the
World Trade Center in New York. He said Abdel Rahman stayed at his
house twice on visits to Denmark.

Mansour also said he was in contact with two men whom authorities have
described as aiding or inspiring the Sept. 11 attacks. One was Abu
Qatada, a radical Muslim cleric who was convicted in Jordan of several
bomb attacks; tapes of his speeches were found in the German apartment
used by several Sept. 11 attackers. The other was Imad Eddin Barakat
Yarkas, a Syrian accused in Spain of giving money and support to the
Sept. 11 attackers.

Mansour said he was aware that the police intend to bring charges
against him. But he said that knowing people who had been convicted of
crimes was not illegal and that passing out material downloaded from
the Internet shouldn't be, either.
"Everybody can do it," he said, asserting that Danish officials are
"just trying to show the Americans they are against terrorism. They
don't have anybody, so they are using me."








--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to