"Bush and Blair discussed using American Spyplane in UN colours to
lure Saddam into war."
"I think no one would be surprised at the idea that the use of
spy-planes to review what is going on would be considered. What is
surprising is the idea that they would be used painted in the colours
of the United Nations in order to provoke an attack which could then
be used to justify material breach. Now that plainly looks as if it is
deception, and it raises some fundamental questions of legality, both
in terms of domestic law and international law."

http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/special-reports-storypage.jsp?id=1661

The White House memo

Published: 2 Feb 2006
By: Gary Gibbon

Revealed: Bush and Blair discussed using American Spyplane in UN
colours to lure Saddam into war.


Channel 4 News tonight reveals extraordinary details of George Bush
and Tony Blair's pre-war meeting in January 2003 at which they
discussed plans to begin military action on March 10th 2003,
irrespective of whether the United Nations had passed a new resolution
authorising the use of force.


Channel 4 News has seen minutes from that meeting, which took place in
the White House on 31 January 2003. The two leaders discussed the
possibility of securing further UN support, but President Bush made it
clear that he had already decided to go to war. The details are
contained in a new version of the book 'Lawless World' written by a
leading British human rights lawyer, Philippe Sands QC.

President Bush said that:

"The US would put its full weight behind efforts to get another
resolution and would 'twist arms' and 'even threaten'. But he had to
say that if ultimately we failed, military action would follow anyway.''

Prime Minister Blair responded that he was: "solidly with the
President and ready to do whatever it took to disarm Saddam."

But Mr Blair said that: "a second Security Council resolution would
provide an insurance policy against the unexpected, and international
cover, including with the Arabs."

Mr Sands' book says that the meeting focused on the need to identify
evidence that Saddam had committed a material breach of his
obligations under the existing UN Resolution 1441. There was concern
that insufficient evidence had been unearthed by the UN inspection
team, led by Dr Hans Blix. Other options were considered.

President Bush said: "The US was thinking of flying U2 reconnaissance
aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in UN colours. If
Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach."

He went on: "It was also possible that a defector could be brought out
who would give a public presentation about Saddams WMD, and there was
also a small possibility that Saddam would be assassinated."

Speaking to Channel 4 News, Mr Sands said:

"I think no one would be surprised at the idea that the use of
spy-planes to review what is going on would be considered. What is
surprising is the idea that they would be used painted in the colours
of the United Nations in order to provoke an attack which could then
be used to justify material breach. Now that plainly looks as if it is
deception, and it raises some fundamental questions of legality, both
in terms of domestic law and international law."

Also present at the meeting were President Bush's National Security
Adviser, Condoleeza Rice and her deputy Dan Fried, and the Presidents
Chief of Staff, Andrew Card. The Prime Minister took with him his then
security adviser Sir David Manning, his Foreign Policy aide Matthew
Rycroft, and and his chief of staff, Jonathan Powell.

Those present, as documented in Mr Sands' book, also discussed what
might happen in Iraq after liberation.

President Bush said that he: "thought it unlikely that there would be
internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups."

The Foreign Office issued a statement:

"The Government only committed UK forces to Iraq after securing the
approval of the House in the vote on 18 march 2003.

"The decision to resort to military action to ensure Iraq fulfilled
its obligation imposed by successive UN Security Council Resolutions
was taken only after all other routes to disarm Iraq had failed.


"Of course during this time there were frequent discussions between UK
and US Governments about Iraq." 

>>White House Meeting Memo Special Report 
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/whitehouse_meeting_memo.html

>>Timeline: Road to War
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/special-reports-storypage.jsp?id=1655

>>More background
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/whitehouse_meeting_memo.html






--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to