Lame argument = "if we dont help the Chinese put dissidents in jail, somebody else will" but don't expect us to help out with any domestic US terrorism investigations because that's against our moral principles... _____
U.S. Web Companies Defend China Policies By JOE McDONALD Associated Press Writer BEIJING news://newsclip.ap.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo Inc., Google Inc. and other U.S. Internet companies under fire for assisting in China's censorship efforts are insisting they must obey Beijing or risk limiting access to their most promising market. As the companies face congressional hearings in Washington on Wednesday about their role in aiding the communist regime, they are appealing to the U.S. government for help, saying no private business can resist China on its own. Yet analysts say that even if Washington stepped in to enforce free-speech standards, perhaps by forcing U.S. companies to withdraw their Internet services or equipment from China, the impact would likely be blunted as entrepreneurs from China and other countries move in to fill the void in the rapidly growing market. Google, Yahoo and other high-tech stalwarts like Microsoft Corp. and Cisco Systems Inc. have been steadily expanding in China, believing it will emerge as an Internet gold mine during the next decade. China already has the world's second-largest Internet population, behind the United States, with more than 100 million people online. Yahoo already spent $1 billion for a 40 percent stake in Alibaba.com, China's largest e-commerce site, while Google and Microsoft have been investing heavily in the country. Meeting the demands of China's government has imposed intangible costs on U.S. Internet companies as they fend off complaints about censoring online search results and shutting down Web logs with sensitive content _ actions that critics say violate American principles. It's been a particularly delicate balancing act for Yahoo and Google because they don't want to alienate their core U.S. audience, whose loyalty helps attract the advertising that generates most of their current profits. Google's corporate mantra, "Don't Be Evil," lost some of its resonance last month when it started a Chinese version of its popular search engine that doesn't provide links to content deemed unacceptable by the government. Earlier, Microsoft shut down, at Beijing's request, a popular Chinese blog that touches on sensitive topics such as press freedoms. (Microsoft has since vowed to try to still make such blogs available elsewhere in the future even if one country bans it.) And Yahoo is accused of providing information that led to the jailing of two of its Chinese e-mail users. "All U.S. and international firms operating in China face the same dilemma of complying with laws that lack transparency and that can have disturbing consequences inconsistent with our own beliefs," Yahoo spokeswoman Mary Osako said in a statement in which she also sought U.S. government help. In a statement posted on Google's online journal, senior policy counsel Andrew McLaughlin urged the U.S. government to "treat censorship as a barrier to trade" and to bring up such concerns as part of bilateral diplomatic talks. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Tuesday took a step in the direction favored by Yahoo and Google by creating a Global Internet Freedom Task Force. Activists complain that U.S. Internet companies have already gone beyond their legal obligations in China by selling its government the tools and providing know-how used to monitor Web use, track users and block access to foreign sites run by dissidents and human rights groups. Julien Pain, who heads Internet research for the Paris-based press freedom group Reporters Without Borders, called on the U.S. Commerce Department to monitor the American companies' contracts with China, "to make sure they don't collaborate on these kinds of human rights abuses." Lawmakers plan to question the way U.S. Internet companies have been doing business in China during scheduled hearings Wednesday. U.S. Rep. Tom Lantos, the top Democrat on the House International Relations Committee, has complained that the Internet companies "caved in to Beijing for the sake of profits." Besides Yahoo, Google, Microsoft and Cisco, activists have also criticized Sun Microsystems Inc. and Canada's Nortel Corp., which makes switching equipment that connects Internet users. Pain noted that Washington, by funding operations like Radio Free Asia, has sponsored the development of software to help Chinese Web surfers see blocked sites and avoid government efforts to track e-mail. "It's surreal. They are wasting taxpayers' money on coming up with technology to counteract filtering provided by U.S. companies," Pain said. China encourages Internet use for education and business, but the government also runs what is widely regarded as the world's most sweeping and successful effort to control the Internet. Thousands are believed involved in efforts to scan the Web and impose filters that block access to material deemed subversive or obscene. Companies that host Web logs are required to ensure their customers obey censorship rules. On Tuesday, China defended its access controls. "With the development of the Internet, there has been some harmful and illegal content," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao said at a regular briefing. While China currently relies on foreign-made routers and other high-tech gear, the country has its own fast-growing producer of telecom equipment, Huawei Inc., that analysts say could soon make acceptable substitutes. U.S. high-tech companies in other industries have seen their business affected by similar political tussles. For instance, China turned to European suppliers of some satellite technology after Washington restricted exports on security grounds. David Wolf, managing director of a Beijing consulting firm, Wolf Group Asia, said such realities leave Washington and U.S. tech companies with few options. "It's hard for anything that will come out of Capitol Hill to make speech any freer in China," he said. 060215 011509 Copyright 2006 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. FAIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with "Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976. The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
