"There are places like Derby Line where you can take any number of
side streets that cross the border," another pointed out.
Still another commented that "[Canada and the US] are so intertwined …
as to make it confusing what country you are in. Your next door
neighbor on a quiet small town side street could literally be in
another country. Hate to admit it, I once got lost up there and was
among the confused for a bit. Obviously this creates all kinds of
opportunity for illegal entry," said another.
And there are other towns like Derby Line along the expansive
US-Canadian border where sidestreets and back roads can be used to
cross the border. GAO noted in its 1994 report that a "picture shows
the unpatrolled nature of the border in a Washington town, where an
individual can enter Canada simply by walking across a park."
While the US-VISIT program will work for persons entering the US at
designated border entry points, it does nothing to deter terrorists
from seeking out unguarded pathways into the country."


Except for stupid amateurs, trained terrorists and smart criminals
will continue to enter the U.S. from Canada using uncontrolled road
entries. So, until a comprehensive plan for border control is devised
(DHS still has not submitted a comprehensive one, only bits and pieces
since Congress required that in 2004), the US-VISIT program merely
makes entering the U.S. a pain in the tush for innocent civilians of
both nations without much deterrent effect on the bad guys at all. 
Technical note: The bad guys smuggling marijuana mentioned in the
article got caught, not because of good border surveillance, but
because they did not turn their cell phones off. Thus the joint
RCMP-U.S. group tracking them knew they had crossed the border and
which way they were going using cell tower triangulation.  Just like
the Italians could do after-the-fact tracking of the CIA numbskulls
that kidnapped the Imam because there was a record of which tower
zones they passed through...and when.  Cell phones check in with each
tower zone passed through...even when turned off...so the only way to
avoid that is to remove the battery.  Ciao!

David Bier

http://www.hstoday.us/Kimery_Report/20050121_USVISIT_Begins_at_Small_Vermont_Town_Border_Entry.cfm?IsValid=true

2005-01-21

US-VISIT Begins at Small Vermont Town Border Entry; But Unguarded Side
Streets Can be Used to Cross Border

WASHINGTON, DC, JAN 21 - The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
announced in December it had started US-VISIT biometric entry
procedures in the secondary inspection areas at land ports of entry at
the Lewiston-Queenston, Whirlpool, Peace, and Rainbow Bridges in
Buffalo, New York, and at the port of entry at Derby Line, Vermont.

Visitors requiring an arrival/departure Form I-94 to enter the United
States, including those traveling under the Visa Waiver Program, will
be processed through US-VISIT at the secondary inspection area.

US-VISIT processing involves the collection of two index fingerscans
and a digital photograph. Additionally, with the deployment of
US-VISIT technology, a visitor will no longer be required to fill out
the Form I-94 by hand. Now the visitor's biographic information will
be entered electronically when a Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
officer scans the visitor's travel document. In ports where this
technology has been deployed, the advancement has proven to expedite a
visitor's inspection time.

The implementation of US-VISIT at the border entry point into the
United States at Derby Line, Vermont is of particular interest. In
1994, Congress' investigative arm, the General Accounting Office,
since renamed the Government Accountability Office (GAO), paid special
attention to Derby Line - a town of about 5,000 residents, in its
report, "Money Laundering: U.S. Efforts To Fight It Are Threatened By
Currency Smuggling."

In this report, which was requested by the Chairman of the Senate
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, GAO highlighted – with
photographs – that "in many locations on the Canadian border there is
no Customs presence at all, and individuals and vehicles can cross the
border at will. For example, one picture shows a crossing on an
isolated country road in Vermont while another shows a crossing on a
residential street in a Vermont town.

That residential street is in Derby Line. It sits directly across from
the Canadian border of Stanstead, home to roughly 3,000 Quebecians.
Together they form a rural working-class community in which there are
residential streets straddling the border, such as Derby Line's Maple
Street.

This reporter has been to Derby Line and driven into Canada using one
of the streets GAO referred to.

Boston Magazine wrote about one of Derby Line's side streets that
crosses the border and other unguarded entry points into the US in its
Dec. 2001 issue.

In Oct., 2002, 33 year-old Phong Nguyen and 47 year-old Houng Chau
from Montreal were arrested for trying to smuggle 44 pounds of
marijuana into the US by crossing the border using a side street in
Derby Line. Border Patrol agents eventually stopped the two men in
Holland, a short distance away.

Derby Line's Haskell Free Library and Opera House is an
internationally designated historic site that draws visitors from
around the world from having been featured in "Ripley's Believe It Or
Not." It's the only library and opera house built directly astride an
international border. The border runs down the middle of the building
and is marked with a black line on the floor.

Similarly, in some places, when locals back out of their driveways
they're actually backing up into Canada because the border runs down
the middle of some streets.

Canusa Avenue is a street that's also both in Vermont and Quebec.
Residents must report to border patrol if they cross it.

A scrub of the Web found chat rooms, blogs and other discussions
mentioning the Derby Line conundrum.

"There are several opportunities to turn onto side streets before the
[US border checkpoint,] one said.

"There are places like Derby Line where you can take any number of
side streets that cross the border," another pointed out.

Still another commented that "[Canada and the US] are so intertwined …
as to make it confusing what country you are in. Your next door
neighbor on a quiet small town side street could literally be in
another country. Hate to admit it, I once got lost up there and was
among the confused for a bit. Obviously this creates all kinds of
opportunity for illegal entry," said another.

And there are other towns like Derby Line along the expansive
US-Canadian border where sidestreets and back roads can be used to
cross the border. GAO noted in its 1994 report that a "picture shows
the unpatrolled nature of the border in a Washington town, where an
individual can enter Canada simply by walking across a park."

While the US-VISIT program will work for persons entering the US at
designated border entry points, it does nothing to deter terrorists
from seeking out unguarded pathways into the country.

The Intelligence Community reform legislation President Bush signed
into law in December authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security to
carry out a pilot program to test various advanced technologies that
will improve border security along the northern border of the United
States, especially "in remote stretches of border lands with long
distances between 24-hour ports of entry with a relatively small
presence of United States border patrol officers." This is to be
accomplished "using advanced technological systems, including sensors,
video and unmanned aerial vehicles. Depending on how successful this
surveillance program is, it may be extended "along the entire northern
border of the United States."

As for the border with Mexico, within six months the Secretary of
Homeland Security must submit to the President and appropriate
Congressional oversight committees "a comprehensive plan for the
systematic surveillance of the southwest border of the United States
by remotely piloted aircraft."

Additionally, in each fiscal year from 2006 to 2010, the Secretary of
Homeland Security shall, subject to the availability of appropriations
for such purpose, increase by not less than 2,000 the number of
positions for full-time active-duty border patrol agents above the
number of such positions for which funds were allotted the preceding
fiscal year. In each fiscal year from 2006 to 2010, in addition to the
border patrol agents assigned along the northern border of the United
States during the previous fiscal year, the Secretary of Homeland
Security "shall assign a number of border patrol agents equal to not
less than 20 percent of the net increase in border patrol agents
during each such fiscal year."





--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to