http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/13922954.htm
 
 <http://www.komotv.com/news/story_m.asp?ID=41955>
http://www.komotv.com/news/story_m.asp?ID=41955 
 
  

Canadian border guards flee in the face of danger


BY SAM HOWE VERHOVEK


LOS ANGELES TIMES


BLAINE, Wash. - The 100-mph car chase ended in a blaze of gunfire at the
Peace Arch, the graceful marble monument that straddles the U.S.-Canada
border in Blaine and proclaims the two nations to be "Children of a Common
Mother."

As two murder suspects from California blew past the U.S. customs station
and raced north for the border, a deputy sheriff managed to ram their
vehicle with his squad car, spinning it down an embankment and across a
broad lawn between the two border stations before it came to a stop. The
suspects fled on foot. In the ensuing gun battle, one was wounded; in the
end, they were captured.

While the Jan. 24 episode was by far the most dramatic encounter between
fugitives and law enforcement officers at the border in recent months, the
reaction on the Canadian side unfolded along a standard -- if contentious --
script: The Canadian border guards walked off their posts.

About a dozen times in the past four months, Canadian border guards, who
unlike their U.S. counterparts are unarmed, have left their posts in
response to reports of dangerous suspects heading north.

The walk-offs, spanning the border at posts from Washington state to New
York, have closed the crossings for periods of a few minutes to as long as
several hours. In the most recent incident Feb. 10, traffic heading from
Blaine into British Columbia was backed up for three hours after Canadian
guards left their posts in response to a report that a murder suspect from
the Seattle area might be headed their way. The alleged killer never
materialized.

The tie-ups have been a source of major aggravation for motorists and minor
diplomatic headaches. They became an issue in Canada's recent national
elections -- with the victorious Conservative government promising it would
support arming the border guards, an idea backed by the union that
represents them.

"Primarily this has been an image thing. We're a peaceful nation, with
Canadians being proud of the fact that we don't greet people at the border
crossings with someone who's armed," said Ron Moran, the union's president.

"But the reality is that we don't live in Mr. Rogers' neighborhood anymore,"
added Moran, whose 10,500-member Ottawa-based group officially is known by
its English-French bilingual name, the Customs Excise Union -- Douanes
Accise. "The reality is that our officers should be armed."

The issue of whether the border officers should carry guns has been debated
for years.

Officials of the Liberal party, which was in charge until recently,
generally opposed the idea. As then-revenue minister Martin Cauchon put it a
few years ago: "Side-arms would not reflect our image."

But Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper vowed during his campaign to
give "our customs and border guards the training and equipment they need --
including side-arms."

Harper also said he would address guards' concerns about the solo shifts
that some of them work at remote border crossings. U.S. border stations have
two or more guards.

On Jan. 31, a guard with the Canada Border Service Agency refused to man his
post in remote Roosville, British Columbia, after hearing reports about an
armed suspect who had evaded Montana authorities near Lone Pine State Park,
about 60 miles south of the border.

Police in Flathead County, Mont., issued a bulletin saying the suspect
possibly was heading north and had warned authorities that he wouldn't be
captured alive. He was apprehended two days later, found hiding in the
bushes of a park in Kalispell, Mont.

The Canadian border post was reopened after a few hours when a nonunion
management official took over. The location was so remote that only four
trucks and one car were lined up on the U.S. side.

Management has stepped in during walk-offs by guards, but not always with
enough manpower to stop tie-ups, as was the case in Blaine last weekend.

At the Blaine crossing, about 110 miles north of Seattle and 30 miles south
of Vancouver, British Columbia, traffic was proceeding smoothly the other
day. Canadian border guards on duty politely referred questions about the
walk-offs to Paula Shore, a spokeswoman for the border services agency.

Shore said there had been "a bit of a slowdown" because of the ongoing
dispute over whether guards should be armed. She said the guards -- who are
issued bulletproof vests and pepper spray -- were exercising a legal right
under Canadian law to leave a workplace they consider unsafe.

While the U.S. and Canada have different regulations over side-arms at the
border, she said, "We all want the same thing: safety and security for our
countries and their citizens."

No Canadian guard has been killed or shot in recent years by a fugitive
crossing the border, Moran said. But several have had guns or knives pointed
at them, and they have had to follow Canadian procedure: Let the suspected
criminals go by without confrontation, then call the Canadian Royal Mounted
Police to give chase.

In the incident involving the California murder suspects, at least two
Canadian guards left their posts after hearing the fugitives were headed
their way.

After Whatcom County Sheriff's Deputy Stuart Smith spotted the suspects' car
at a rest stop about five miles south of Blaine and attempted to arrest
them, the pair sped off.

Smith followed them to the end of Interstate 5, witnesses said.

"It was like something out of a movie," said Miguel Ramos, the owner of Paso
del Norte, a Mexican restaurant about a block from the U.S. border station.
"These cars came screeching through here, there was a big crash" -- Smith
ramming the suspects' vehicle -- "and then they ran off toward the Canadian
side."

The shots that stopped them were fired by U.S. Customs and Border Protection
inspectors, said Whatcom County Sheriff Bill Elfo.

Elfo, a former Blaine police chief, said the incident was the most
sensational border apprehension he could recall.

"You know they're not armed at the station across the border," Elfo said.
"That's always a consideration" for U.S. law enforcement personnel when they
are deciding on a course of action during a pursuit.

Moran said members of his union were responding appropriately to the risk by
walking off their posts until danger had passed.

"It's normal human behavior," he said. "It is strictly a question of these
men and women wanting to make sure they get back to their families at the
end of their shift."

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to