"How would you feel if, in the aftermath of September 11, the US
government had decided to contract out airport security to the ...
country where most of the operational planning and financing of the
attacks occurred?" he asked in his weekly column in the right-wing
Washington Times, February 14.
"It seems a safe bet that you, like most Americans, would think it a
lunatic idea, one that would clear the way for still more terror in
this country," he argued, concluding, "If the President will not,
Congress must ensure that the United Arab Emirates is not entrusted
with the operation of any American ports."
"While protection of US ports from "Islamofascists" is his priority of
the moment, he is particularly concerned about Iran's nuclear
ambitions. At a recent Committee on the Present Danger forum in
Congress, he warned that Tehran "is working toward a capability that
could destroy America as we know it".
Iran's missile program, he asserted, appears designed to detonate a
nuclear weapon "in space high above the United States, unleashing an
immensely powerful electro-magnetic pulse" that would destroy the US
electrical grid. The result could reduce the US "to a pre-industrial
society in the blink of an eye"." 


Gaffney makes an excellent point about the DP World deal.  After being
constantly and repeatedly pumped up with fear by CICBush43
inflammatory rhetoric about Islamic terrorists about to attack the
U.S., he then appears to swing to the far left to support DP World's
deal. Borders on political suicide and alienation of a big chunk of
his conservative core constituency already not happy with the clueless
handling of Iraq pacification. 
But Gaffney is even more accurate about what would happen if Iran goes
forward with its nuclear program coupled with North Korean and Russian
missile technology.  For a really good look at a simulation of a U.S.
post-EMP society, go pull some of the TV episodes of the Fox program
Dark Angel that was on the tube in 2001 (truncated swiftly after 9/11)
starring Jessica Alba.  Discount the government mutants but take a
cold hard look at what happens to the average American reduced to
abject grinding peasantry when suddenly there is no financial system
and the only law is martial law.  Ain't pretty...

David Bier

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HB25Ak03.html

Feb 25, 2006
        
        
The superhawk's big flap

By Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON - Love him or hate him, Frank Gaffney is effective.

The founder and president of the Washington-based Center for Security
Policy (CSP), a small think tank funded mainly by US defense
contractors, far-right foundations and right-wing Zionists, Gaffney
was among the first to seize on the government's approval of a Dubai
company to manage terminals at six major US ports and helped blow it
up into a major embarrassment for President George W Bush.

Indeed, it was Gaffney who wrote the first nationally syndicated
column about the approval, which, if sustained, would turn over the
management of terminals in the ports of New York, New Jersey,
Philadelphia, Miami, Baltimore and New Orleans to Dubai



Ports World (DPW), a government-owned company based in the United Arab
Emirates (UAE).

"How would you feel if, in the aftermath of September 11, the US
government had decided to contract out airport security to the ...
country where most of the operational planning and financing of the
attacks occurred?" he asked in his weekly column in the right-wing
Washington Times, February 14.

"It seems a safe bet that you, like most Americans, would think it a
lunatic idea, one that would clear the way for still more terror in
this country," he argued, concluding, "If the President will not,
Congress must ensure that the United Arab Emirates is not entrusted
with the operation of any American ports."

With the help of other right-wing columnists and broadcast
commentators who quickly rallied to his call, Gaffney's alarum - much
like the famous ride of Paul Revere, the colonist who warned towns
around Boston at the outset of the war for independence that "the
British are coming!" - helped transform what had been a relatively
routine decision by a high-level inter-agency committee that reviews
major foreign investments in the US into the biggest story in
Washington within just seven days.

Indeed, eight days after publishing what a Nexis data-base search
identified as the first broadside against the deal, and many
television (especially Fox News) and talk-radio appearances later,
Gaffney was claiming victory, this time in an article published by
National Review Online, where he is a contributing editor.

"President Bush has dug in his heels on a fight he surely cannot win,"
wrote Gaffney, noting the president's threat to veto any legislation
that would annul the DPW deal. "The deal will ... be aborted."

Indeed, on Thursday, the Dubai company offered to delay the part of
the deal related to the US to give the Bush administration more time
to convince lawmakers the deal posed no security risks.

It has been a typical performance by the indefatigable Gaffney, who
bills his Center for Security Policy as "the special forces in the war
of ideas".

Precisely whom the war is being waged against depends on the week. But
since the center's founding in 1988, the enemy has included the Soviet
Union and its real or suspected allies; China; the Oslo peace process;
Arabs (especially Palestinians); the United Nations and the Law of the
Sea, in particular; anyone opposed to ever-bigger defense budgets and
expensive, if unworkable, missile-defense programs; and, most
recently, "Islamofascists" (from al-Qaeda to Saudi Arabia and the UAE
to Iran).

Other nemeses include professors of Middle East studies; the Middle
East specialists at the State Department and Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA); and even Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, whose
withdrawal from Gaza marks a "threat to the entire Free World,
including its leader, the United States".

Like many neo-conservatives, Gaffney began his adult political life in
the early 1970s as a hawkish but liberal Democrat. And, like several
heavyweights in the movement - including former Defense Policy Board
chairman and American Enterprise Institute honcho Richard Perle, and
Bush's chief Middle East advisor, Elliott Abrams - he worked on the
staff of former Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Henry "Scoop"
Jackson, a staunch supporter of Israel widely known as well as the
"Senator from Boeing".

In the 1980s, Perle, by then a senior Pentagon official under Ronald
Reagan, hired Gaffney, who eventually rose to become assistant
secretary of defense for international security policy. In that role,
he became a vociferous advocate of Reagan's "Star Wars" programs and a
determined foe of high-technology arms transfers to Washington's
European allies, before being forced out in 1987 by the more moderate
national security leadership that took power in the wake of the
Iran-contra scandal.

When he left government, he founded CSP and, with Perle's help,
quickly gained the backing of key defense contractors, particularly
those positioned to benefit from Reagan's "Star Wars" program. He also
found favor with US followers of Israel's right-wing Likud Party, the
most notorious being Irving Moskowitz, the California "casino king"
who has sent millions of dollars to the most aggressive elements of
the West Bank settlement movement.

Like Perle, his mentor and a long-time member of CSP's board of
advisors, Gaffney has occupied key nodes in an interlocking network of
neo-conservatives, such as former UN ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and
former Central Intelligence Agency director James Woolsey, and
aggressive nationalists, such as Vice President Dick Cheney, Pentagon
chief Donald Rumsfeld and UN Ambassador John Bolton, that dates back
to the mid-1970s.

Most recently, for example, he has served on the boards of the
Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a pro-Likud group formed
two days after September 11; Americans for a Victory Over Terrorism;
the Committee on the Present Danger; "Set America Free" a new
coalition of neo-conservative, Jewish and green groups to reduce US
reliance on oil imports; and has been closely associated with the
Project for the New American Century.

His own board includes individuals like Charles Kupperman, a vice
president for missile defense systems of the Boeing Company; MDB
Carlisle, the Pentagon's former chief lobbyist; and David Steinmann,
the long-time chairman of the pro-Likud Jewish Institute for National
Security Affairs.

Like other right-wingers and consistent with his obsession with
missile defense, Gaffney was most preoccupied with threats from states
- particularly China, North Korea, Iraq and Syria - until the
September 11 attacks. Indeed, in an odd echo of the Dubai controversy,
he mounted a major campaign against the leasing by Hutchison-Whampoa
of two port facilities at either end of the Panama Canal in the late
1990s. He argued that the lease was part of a Chinese plot to close
the canal to US warships in a future crisis.

After September 11, however, he embraced the "global war on terror" as
the new imperative and redefined the chief enemy as "Islamofascism", a
phrase that "makes clear that the war is about much more than Iraq and
Afghanistan" and includes those countries - namely, Saudi Arabia,
Iran, Syria, Pakistan, North Korea, China, Cuba, Venezuela and South
Africa - which provide direct or indirect support for the
Islamofascists "in their death struggle with us".

Indeed, his latest ideas for defeating Washington's enemies are laid
out in a new book in which he acted as the lead author, War Footing:
Ten Steps America Must Take to Survive and Prevail in the War for the
Free World, with several of his CSP colleagues and Michael Rubin,
another Perle protege at AEI.

While protection of US ports from "Islamofascists" is his priority of
the moment, he is particularly concerned about Iran's nuclear
ambitions. At a recent Committee on the Present Danger forum in
Congress, he warned that Tehran "is working toward a capability that
could destroy America as we know it".

Iran's missile program, he asserted, appears designed to detonate a
nuclear weapon "in space high above the United States, unleashing an
immensely powerful electro-magnetic pulse" that would destroy the US
electrical grid. The result could reduce the US "to a pre-industrial
society in the blink of an eye". 






--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to