Terror list snagging too many Americans with `wrong' name

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/opinion/14385671.htm
Apr. 20, 2006

By Shirin Sinnar

While Congress continues to debate the National Security Agency's program of
warrantless wiretapping, another form of government scrutiny has largely
escaped public notice. A growing number of private companies are now
screening potential customers against a government watch-list of suspected
terrorists. Financial institutions, credit bureaus, charities, landlords and
even employers are checking names against the list -- a trend on a collision
course with civil rights.

This watch-list, maintained by the Treasury Department Office of Foreign
Assets Control (OFAC), now numbers more than 5,000 names. Shortly after the
Sept. 11 attacks, federal agencies began blocking the assets of hundreds of
people and groups believed to be associated with terrorism, and adding them
to the OFAC list. Most people on the list have never set foot in the United
States. But because many names on the list are common Muslim or Latino
names, people in this country with similar names are increasingly getting
snagged.

A Roseville couple recently found that out the hard way at a local fitness
store. When they attempted to buy a treadmill on a financing plan, a Wells
Fargo representative told the salesperson that the couple would have to wait
72 hours while they were investigated. The reason? The husband's first name
was Hussein. He is a U.S. citizen who has lived here more than 30 years, but
because others named Hussein -- like Saddam -- are on the list, he had to be
``cleared.''

Similarly, a Chicago resident discovered the watch-list when he went to an
auto dealership to purchase a used car. At the top of his credit report, a
salesman noticed a reference to an ``OFAC search'' -- followed by the names
of terrorists, including Osama bin Laden. Apparently, the customer's last
name, Muhammad -- one of the most common names in the world -- had triggered
false matches to the watch-list, because the individuals named on the credit
report had Muhammad as their middle name.

One wonders what would have happened had this man applied for a job or
sought to rent an apartment using the same credit report. How many nervous
employers or landlords would have simply turned him down, scared off by the
alarming reference to terrorists? The prospect of lost opportunities for
jobs or homes is very real, as more employers and landlords begin checking
not just credit reports but also the OFAC list itself -- most with very
little understanding of what the list means.

Why are companies screening people against the list? While some, like
financial institutions, are required to do so by the government, most
businesses face no such requirement. But because the law prohibits anyone in
the United States from doing business with people on the list, theoretically
any company or individual could be fined for a transaction with a
blacklisted person. No one is suggesting, just yet, that the corner grocery
sift through 5,000 names before selling a gallon of milk. But the
government's failure to limit name-checking to high-risk industries leaves
risk-averse businesses to adopt their own measures to ward off potential
penalties.

This lack of guidance from the government has its costs, and not just for
individuals. Businesses encounter steep costs from adopting screening
programs. Worse, charities are encumbered in their ability to help those in
need. U.S. charities are now advised by the Treasury Department to check the
OFAC list before giving aid. Imagine the Red Cross telling a tsunami-ravaged
villager in Indonesia that before she can get a blanket, she must provide
her name, date of birth and place of birth, and then wait three days to be
cleared of being a terrorist.

The problem is compounded by the mistakes in the list itself. According to a
report by the Sept. 11 Commission staff, OFAC listed several individuals
whom it later removed because investigators could not show that they were
connected to terrorism. Two Somali-Americans endured 10 months of economic
deprivation and public stigma before being removed from the OFAC list.

What should be done? First, the government should immediately set up a means
to investigate and resolve complaints from Americans who are mistakenly
flagged by OFAC screening. Second, OFAC should clearly limit
watch-list-screening to those industries, and sectors within industries,
where there is a serious risk of funding terrorism. And third, OFAC should
address the civil liberties problems raised in placing people on the list in
the first place.

Until then, every Hussein, Muhammad or Carlos in America will remain a
target simply for having the ``wrong'' name.


-------------
SHIRIN SINNAR is an attorney and Equal Justice Works Fellow at the Lawyers'
Committee for Civil Rights, where she leads the Project on Post-9/11
Discrimination.





--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to