http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article359766.ece

 

Criminals using FoI Act to identify informants 


By Jason Bennetto, Crime Correspondent 


Published: 24 April 2006 


The Independent


Murderers and convicted criminals are using the Freedom of Information Act
to try to identify the police informers who helped to jail them. 

Offenders are also contacting the police and Home Office asking for details
of how the authorities caught them. This includes information about
undercover police operations and forensic science techniques used to recover
their DNA.

Police suspect that more than 100 convicted criminals have conducted
searches and they fear that the lives of informants could be put at risk if
any details about their identity are released. They also believe that
criminals are trying to learn from their mistakes so that they do not get
caught the same way next time.

In some cases, the criminals use aliases, or get their friends and family to
make the requests. Most of the offenders causing police concern are still
serving jail sentences. They include many murderers.

The Home Office said it was aware of five to 10 convicted criminals making
Freedom of Information requests to the department.

Since January last year, public bodies have been under a duty to disclose
previously withheld information whenever possible. But police stressed that
"abusive" requests such as those from criminals made up only a tiny
proportion of the 22,000 applications for information the police dealt with
in England and Wales last year.

Chief Inspector Paul Brooks, the Association of Chief Police Officers'
project manager for the Freedom of Information Act, said: "We get a lot of
requests about individual cases, not just murders. There are requests from
offenders. They will dig into a case and go after any information they can
get hold of. If you are not careful, material could be released
inadvertently that gave away the identity of an informer.

"You have to be extremely careful in what you say. For example, if you give
out information that could only have come from one source, you may reveal an
informer's identify. The police service will protects its informants
throughout their lives."

Offenders often want to find out information about how they were caught, he
added. "This includes information from the DNA database and what police
methods were used."

When the police believe someone is trying to find out details of an informer
or learn confidential police tactics, the request for information is
refused. It is exempted under the FoI law because it is about informers or
sensitive information. Chief Insp Brooks said: "We are picking these
requests up before they get very far. Our advice to police forces is that
they need to get the SIO [senior investigating officer] for each case
involved so that they know what the issues are."

Ian Readhead, Deputy Chief Constable of Hampshire and the force's spokesman
on FoI issues, said: "Some murderers are making requests for information.
This can include sensitive information - for example, SIOs may have included
in their reports the source of information used for a conviction."

In a separate development, one man has made more than a thousand requests
under the Freedom of Information Act and used the details he received to
impersonate police officers and members of the armed forces. The man, who is
known to police, has asked for details about police and armed forces
procedures and collected the names of officers. He has then allegedly
attempted to get into military bases, and police stations, by pretending to
know people inside.

Although the man has had a positive reply to many of his requests the police
have now decided that he poses a potential danger and are refusing most of
his applications. 

Murderers and convicted criminals are using the Freedom of Information Act
to try to identify the police informers who helped to jail them. 

Offenders are also contacting the police and Home Office asking for details
of how the authorities caught them. This includes information about
undercover police operations and forensic science techniques used to recover
their DNA.

Police suspect that more than 100 convicted criminals have conducted
searches and they fear that the lives of informants could be put at risk if
any details about their identity are released. They also believe that
criminals are trying to learn from their mistakes so that they do not get
caught the same way next time.

In some cases, the criminals use aliases, or get their friends and family to
make the requests. Most of the offenders causing police concern are still
serving jail sentences. They include many murderers.

The Home Office said it was aware of five to 10 convicted criminals making
Freedom of Information requests to the department.

Since January last year, public bodies have been under a duty to disclose
previously withheld information whenever possible. But police stressed that
"abusive" requests such as those from criminals made up only a tiny
proportion of the 22,000 applications for information the police dealt with
in England and Wales last year.

Chief Inspector Paul Brooks, the Association of Chief Police Officers'
project manager for the Freedom of Information Act, said: "We get a lot of
requests about individual cases, not just murders. There are requests from
offenders. They will dig into a case and go after any information they can
get hold of. If you are not careful, material could be released
inadvertently that gave away the identity of an informer.

"You have to be extremely careful in what you say. For example, if you give
out information that could only have come from one source, you may reveal an
informer's identify. The police service will protects its informants
throughout their lives."

Offenders often want to find out information about how they were caught, he
added. "This includes information from the DNA database and what police
methods were used."

When the police believe someone is trying to find out details of an informer
or learn confidential police tactics, the request for information is
refused. It is exempted under the FoI law because it is about informers or
sensitive information. Chief Insp Brooks said: "We are picking these
requests up before they get very far. Our advice to police forces is that
they need to get the SIO [senior investigating officer] for each case
involved so that they know what the issues are."

Ian Readhead, Deputy Chief Constable of Hampshire and the force's spokesman
on FoI issues, said: "Some murderers are making requests for information.
This can include sensitive information - for example, SIOs may have included
in their reports the source of information used for a conviction."

In a separate development, one man has made more than a thousand requests
under the Freedom of Information Act and used the details he received to
impersonate police officers and members of the armed forces. The man, who is
known to police, has asked for details about police and armed forces
procedures and collected the names of officers. He has then allegedly
attempted to get into military bases, and police stations, by pretending to
know people inside.

Although the man has had a positive reply to many of his requests the police
have now decided that he poses a potential danger and are refusing most of
his applications. 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to