UK hasn't noticed the al-Qaeda/Iran terrorist war against them already...?
 
Bruce
 


http://politics.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1808832,00.html
 
The intelligence agencies have warned ministers that Iran could launch
terrorist attacks against British targets if the row over its controversial
nuclear programme escalates, it was disclosed today. 

The parliamentary intelligence and security committee - which oversees the
work of the agencies - said the possibility of Iranian state-sponsored
terrorism was now considered one of the main threats facing the UK. 


"There is increasing international tension over Iran's nuclear programme and
backing of groups such as Lebanese Hezbollah," the committee said in its
annual report.

"There is a possibility of an increased threat to UK interests from Iranian
state-sponsored terrorism should the diplomatic situation deteriorate." 

Ministers have previously claimed that sophisticated roadside bombs used in
a series of deadly attacks on British troops in Iraq have been supplied
through Iran, although they have not blamed the regime directly. 


The committee - which is made up of senior MPs and peers - took evidence
from the heads of MI6, MI5, GCHQ and the defence intelligence staff in
drawing up its report. 


It said that Britain continued to face a "serious and sustained threat" from
international terrorism - most significantly from al Qaida and associated
networks. 


Other security threats included the activities of dissident groups in
Northern Ireland - which continued to pose a threat in the province and on
the British mainland - and the international spread of weapons of mass
destruction. 


Asked about the perceived threat from Iran, Tony Blair's official spokesman
said: "I don't want to give a piecemeal response to the ISC report. I think
it's better we respond in terms of the government as a whole." 


He said the cabinet this morning, at its regular weekly meeting, "reviewed
the whole counter-terrorism strategy and approach but, in terms of the
particular aspects of the ISC report, I think it's better we give our
collective response". 


That would probably be in about six months' time, added the spokesman. 


He went on: "The terrorism threat remains very active and very real. Our
commitment is that, if there is a specific threat the public need to know
about, then we will tell them." 


The report also revealed that MI5, the security service, was expanding so
rapidly in order to meet the threat of terrorism in the UK that it had
outgrown its London headquarters building. 


Thames House at Westminster is expected to have exhausted its capacity by
October. The committee said another building had been found to provide
additional accommodation - but its identity was censored out on security
grounds. 


MI5 staff numbers are now expected to grow by over 50% over the next three
years, with over half its resources now devoted to counter-terrorism. 


The committee welcomed the expansion but warned that the risks involved in
taking on large numbers of inexperienced staff would have to be carefully
managed. 


"This growth carries a series of risks that the service will need to manage
over the next few years, including the need to maintain standards in
operational capability and service to customers in spite of the increased
proportion of new and inexperienced staff," it said. 


It said that the expansion had been accompanied by an acceleration of MI5's
regionalisation programme in the wake of the July 7 bombings, with the
opening of a number of regional stations around the country. 


The committee said that with the overall budget for the intelligence
agencies due to rise to more than £1.5bn, it was essential to have proper
financial controls in place. 


"The significant additional funding made available since 9/11 has generally
been accepted as essential for building capacity across the intelligence
community to counter threats from international terrorism and to provide an
enhanced standard of coverage and assurance," it said. 


"Given that this represents an unprecedented level of new funding for the
agencies, it is important, the committees view, that mechanisms are in place
and functioning to ensure that money is well spent, appropriately controlled
and monitored, and serves as a driver for increased efficiency." 






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to