Don’t worry about a backlash against Islam…to survive, the West needs that 
backlash!

Bruce


Media may incite terror - Keelty

By Steve Larkin

October 26, 2006 04:33pm
Article from: AAP

http://www.news. <http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20649332-1702,00.html> 
com.au/story/0,23599,20649332-1702,00.html

AUSTRALIAN Federal Police Commissioner Mick Keelty today warned the media 
against turning society so against Islam that it created a terrorist backlash.

Mr Keelty called for moderation in media coverage of issues including 
controversial comments by a senior Islamic cleric.

Sheik Taj al-Din al-Hilaly compared skimpily-dressed women to "uncovered meat" 
and suggested they were "the problem" that caused sexual attacks, The 
Australian reported today.

Mr Keelty said that if true, the comments were inflammatory.

"Obviously what was said is going to be offensive to many of us in the 
community," Mr Keelty said in Adelaide today.

"But I would also point out that there are many other people in the community 
who say offensive things from time to time as well, and many of them are ... 
caucasian Australians.

"Clearly things are going to be said from time to time that I guess inflame the 
situation and for all us, we have got to look at ways to try and keep some 
element of moderation about what we say and what we do."

In a speech to the South Australian Press Club, Mr Keelty said: "if we are not 
careful, I think we risk raising a generation of Australians who will have a 
bias against Islam".

"As I travel around the country and speak to different Islamic communities ... 
you hear more and more stories of treatment of the Islamic community that 
really is sub-standard by members of our own wider community.

"If we don't get a handle on this now, if we don't actually teach the values to 
future generations that we were brought up with, we do risk, I think, having a 
bigger problem in our own future than what we have in our past."

Mr Keelty said he was concerned some media coverage may incite terrorism.

"If we are not careful, the way we treat the issues of security and terrorism 
can in fact incite others to become involved," he said.

He cited reported threats to the safety of the Australian cricket team during 
last year's Ashes series in England as an example, saying Australian media 
followed a story of "questionable background" from the United Kingdom.

"It was the story of a friend of a friend of an alleged friend of an alleged 
bomber that made the front pages and drove our media here for over 24 hours," 
he said.

"It's important that we actually understand that the object of terrorism is to 
kill one and frighten 10,000.

"If we carry the story and we don't understand it, or if we carry the story and 
the story is false, we have actually achieved the objective of the terrorist by 
creating fear in the community."

Mr Keelty said he understood the media's competitive nature but pleaded for 
better co-operation with police.

"One of the things that really does need to be addressed are the headlines now 
creating the opportunity, creating the motivation, for other people to embrace 
these (terrorist) ideas.

"Because while ever we have inequity in all our communities ... there will 
always be people in our community who feel marginalised or disenfranchised.

"We don't want to provide them with more reasons to be further marginalised or 
further disenfranchised to the point where they will take their own life in 
order to kill many others." 

===============================================

Muslim leader blames women for sex attacks
Richard Kerbaj
October 26, 2006

http://theaustralia 
<http://theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20646437-601,00.html> 
n.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20646437-601,00.html

THE nation's most senior Muslim cleric has blamed immodestly dressed women who 
don't wear Islamic headdress for being preyed on by men and likened them to 
abandoned "meat" that attracts voracious animals.

In a Ramadan sermon that has outraged Muslim women leaders, Sydney-based Sheik 
Taj Din al-Hilali also alluded to the infamous Sydney gang rapes, suggesting 
the attackers were not entirely to blame.

While not specifically referring to the rapes, brutal attacks on four women for 
which a group of young Lebanese men received long jail sentences, Sheik Hilali 
said there were women who "sway suggestively" and wore make-up and immodest 
dress ... "and then you get a judge without mercy (rahma) and gives you 65 
years".

"But the problem, but the problem all began with who?" he asked.

The leader of the 2000 rapes in Sydney's southwest, Bilal Skaf, a Muslim, was 
initially sentenced to 55 years' jail, but later had the sentence reduced on 
appeal.

In the religious address on adultery to about 500 worshippers in Sydney last 
month, Sheik Hilali said: "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside 
on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a 
cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the 
uncovered meat?

"The uncovered meat is the problem."

The sheik then said: "If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no 
problem would have occurred."

He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.

"It is said in the state of zina (adultery), the responsibility falls 90 per 
cent of the time on the woman. Why? Because she possesses the weapon of 
enticement (igraa)."

Muslim community leaders were yesterday outraged and offended by Sheik Hilali's 
remarks, insisting the cleric was no longer worthy of his title as Australia's 
mufti.

Young Muslim adviser Iktimal Hage-Ali - who does not wear a hijab - said the 
Islamic headdress was not a "tool" worn to prevent rape and sexual harassment. 
"It's a symbol that readily identifies you as being Muslim, but just because 
you don't wear the headscarf doesn't mean that you're considered fresh meat for 
sale," the former member of John Howard's Muslim advisory board told The 
Australian. "The onus should not be on the female to not attract attention, it 
should be on males to learn how to control themselves."

Australia's most prominent female Muslim leader, Aziza Abdel-Halim, said the 
hijab did not "detract or add to a person's moral standards", while Islamic 
Council of Victoria spokesman Waleed Ali said it was "ignorant and naive" for 
anyone to believe that a hijab could stop sexual assault.

"Anyone who is foolish enough to believe that there is a relationship between 
rape or unwelcome sexual interference and the failure to wear a hijab, clearly 
has no understanding of the nature of sexual crime," he said.

Ms Hage-Ali said she was "disgusted and offended" by Shiek Hilali's comments. 
"I find it very offensive that a man who considers himself as a mufti, a leader 
of Australia's Muslims, can give comment that lacks intelligence and common 
sense."

Yesterday, the mufti defended the sermon about "adultery and theft", a recorded 
copy of which has been obtained and translated by The Australian.

Sheik Hilali said he only meant to refer to prostitutes as "meat" and not any 
scantily dressed woman with no hijab, despite him not mentioning the word 
prostitute during the 17-minute talk.

He told The Australian the message he intended to convey was: "If a woman who 
shows herself off, she is to blame ... but a man should be able to control 
himself". He said if a woman is "covered and respectful" she "demands respect 
from a man". "But when she is cheap, she throws herself at the man and cheapens 
herself."

Sheik Hilali also insisted his references to the Sydney gang rapes were to 
illustrate that Skaf was guilty and worthy of receiving such a harsh sentence.

Waleed Ali said Sheik Hilali was "normalising immoral sexual behaviour" by 
comparing women to meat and men to animals and entirely blaming women for being 
victims.

"It's basically saying that the immoral response of men to women who are not 
fully covered is as natural and as inevitable as the response of an animal 
tempted by food," he said.

"But (unlike animals) men are people who have moral responsibilities and the 
capability in engaging in moral action."

Revelation of the mufti's comments comes after he criticised Mr Howard last 
month in The Australian for saying a minority of migrant men mistreated their 
women. Sheik Hilali said such a minority was found in all faiths. "Those who 
don't respect their women are not true Muslims."

"There's a small percentage found among all religions, but we don't recognise 
ours as Muslims."

Aziza Abdel-Halim said Sheik Hilali's remarks during Ramadan were inaccurate 
and upsetting to the Muslim community.

"They are below and beyond any comment (and) do not deserve any consideration."

===============================================

Matt Price
The unacceptable face of Islam
Thursday, October 26, 2006

http://blogs. 
<http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/mattprice/index.php/theaustralian/comments/the_unacceptable_face_of_islam/>
 
theaustralian.news.com.au/mattprice/index.php/theaustralian/comments/the_unacceptable_face_of_islam/

PRU Goward wants him deported. Peter Costello says he should be condemned. Kim 
Beazley thinks he should retract his words.

Actually, Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali has done us a huge service airing his 
appalling views at last month’s Ramadan service (Muslim leader blames women 
for sex attacks).

In Australia and around the world, Muslim women are under increasing pressure 
to abandon their veils and hijabs and make a greater effort to assimilate with 
Western culture.

Sheik Hilali's draconian religious address helps us understand why this is no 
easy task.

Remember, these are not the ravings of a radical Islamo-fascist--Hilali is one 
of the most senior Muslim clerics in Australia.

Nor were they off-the-cuff comments. Hilali's sermon comparing women with meat 
and blaming female immodesty for adultery--and, by inference, sexual 
assault--was delivered to hundreds of worshippers during an important religious 
ceremony.

Islam, we're constantly told, is a peaceful and tolerant religion, but Hilali's 
comments undermine this contention. All power to the young Muslim women 
outraged by the sheik’s sermon, but Hilali's sermon reminds us you don't need 
to be an Islamic extremist or terrorist to hold views utterly incompatible with 
modern society.

We should stop focusing on females wearing veils and concentrate on the 
oppressive, archaic aspects of their religion that put unfeasible, unacceptable 
pressure on Islamic women and, by extension, present an excuse for disgraceful, 
abusive, oppressive behaviour and sexual abuse. 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to