http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/15831724.htm

 


West wants Iran technology sales banned


GEORGE JAHN


Associated Press


VIENNA, Austria - The U.S. and its allies want the U.N. Security Council to
ban the sale of missile and atomic technology to Iran and end most U.N. help
for its nuclear programs - moves diplomats said Tuesday are narrowly focused
in hopes of winning Russian and Chinese backing for sanctions.

The diplomats, who spoke with The Associated Press on condition of anonymity
because the draft resolution was not yet public, said the proposal also
would commit U.N. member nations to denying entry to Iranian officials
involved in developing missiles or nuclear systems.

A Security Council resolution passed last week imposed similar sanctions on
the sale or transfer of technology that could contribute to North Korea's
nuclear and ballistic missile programs after that nation's test explosion of
a nuclear bomb.

One of the diplomats described all three measures aimed at Iran as moderate
in impact, saying that was an attempt to win Russian and Chinese support.
Moscow and Beijing could be formally presented with the draft later this
week, the diplomat said.

Both Russia and China have agreed in principle to imposing sanctions over
Iran's defiance of a council ultimatum to freeze uranium enrichment and
sharply improve cooperation with the U.N. probe of suspect Iranian atomic
activities.

But both continue to publicly push for dialogue instead of U.N. punishment,
despite the collapse last month of a European Union attempt to entice Iran
into talks. The EU proposed Iran at least temporarily freeze enrichment as a
condition for multilateral talks meant to erase suspicions it may be trying
to build nuclear arms in violation of its treaty commitments.

As permanent members of the council, Russia and China hold the power to veto
its actions, as do the United States, France and Britain, which drew up the
sanctions resolution.

Iran insists it won't halt uranium enrichment, which it says is intended
solely to produce fuel for nuclear reactors that will generate electricity.
But enrichment also can produce material for nuclear warheads, and the U.S.
and others are suspicious of Iran's intentions.

Canceling technical assistance to Iran from the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the
Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, would do little to ease
such fears. But as the first such withdrawal of IAEA help, it would send a
strong signal of international displeasure with Tehran.

IAEA technical programs, which are freely available to all member countries,
are restricted to medical or agricultural help, nuclear safety expertise and
other peaceful applications that cannot be diverted for weapons purposes.

Typical projects, as listed in a confidential IAEA document seen by AP,
involve the disposal of radioactive waste produced by nuclear reactors and
the use of narrowly targeted radiotherapy for tumors.

In a bow to Russia, the draft resolution exempts IAEA technical cooperation
on operational safety and legal advice at Iran's Bushehr nuclear facility
being built by the Russians.

The facility would be Iran's first atomic power plant and the Tehran
government recently allocated about $245 million to finish it. The facility
is now projected to go on line in late 2007, nearly a year later than
originally envisaged.

It was unclear how any eventual sanctions might impact Russia's planned sale
of 29 Tor-M1 air defense missile systems to Iran. Analysts in Russia have
said Moscow might scuttle the deal as part of a give-and-take with
Washington over sanctions.

One of the diplomats who spoke with AP said Washington had wanted to include
Bushehr and ban all IAEA technical cooperation but reluctantly agreed with
Britain and France that Russia would not go along.

A U.N. official said Tehran would probably depict any sanctions as a
U.S.-inspired blow against Iranian programs that aid the poor by using
nuclear technology to treat the sick and to increase agricultural yields by
reducing crop pests.

Additionally, he said, Iran will argue that no evidence has been found
proving it seeks to make nuclear weapons despite more than three years of
IAEA probes. As such, Tehran will say it has a continued right to IAEA
technical aid as an agency member in good standing, he said.

Iran has shrugged off the threat of sanctions. Diplomats told AP on Monday
that experts had begun testing a second enrichment facility at Natanz, in
central Iraq, over the past few weeks in defiance of the council's ban on
such activities.

Iran produced a small batch of low-enriched uranium - suitable for reactor
fuel but not weapons - in February, using its initial cascade of 164
centrifuges at its pilot plant at Natanz.

Iran has said it plans to install 3,000 centrifuges at Natanz by the end of
this year, but experts have said industrial-scale production of enriched
uranium would require 54,000 centrifuges.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to