http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,225218,00.html
Anti-Terrorism ID Programs Show Little to No Progress
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
WASHINGTON - Two anti-terrorism ID programs have been sent back to the
drawing board and a third is being farmed out to private companies after
costing hundreds of millions of dollars.
Begun after the <javascript:siteSearch('Sept.%2011,%202001');> Sept. 11,
2001, hijackings, the programs were supposed to help prevent catastrophic
terrorist attacks on the U.S. transportation system by checking airline
passenger names against watch lists and providing special identification
cards to every worker with access to airports, railroads, seaports or
trucks.
Click here to visit FOXNews.com's War on Terror center.
<http://www.foxnews.com/specialsections/waronterror/index.html>
So far, the
<javascript:siteSearch('Transportation%20Security%20Administration');>
Transportation Security Administration - which has been overseeing
development of the three programs- has not gone beyond testing, has issued
no IDs and has screened no passengers against terrorist lists.
TSA chief <javascript:siteSearch('Kip%20Hawley');> Kip Hawley defended the
agency's efforts this week, saying the projects by their very nature use
expensive and unreliable advanced technology.
All three are back on track, Hawley said. "Massive changes have happened
here," he said. "We have a good acquisitions team and a good process."
According to documents obtained by The Associated Press, the agency has
spent more than $200 million on the Transportation Worker Identity
Credential, Secure Flight and Registered Traveler programs.
On all three, the TSA and contractors hired by the agency have spent more
than anticipated, missed deadlines and raised questions about their ability
to protect the public's privacy and the private sector's commercial
interests.
Congressional investigators have warned repeatedly that the agency is
mismanaging the programs.
"Five years after 9/11, the Bush Administration and TSA are stuck in neutral
on critical security measures," said Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey, a senior
Democrat on the Homeland Security Committee.
"The lack of oversight by this Republican Congress on this program and
countless others is just another reason Americans are ready to head in a new
direction in November," Markey said.
Hawley called Secure Flight the most important of the three projects. It is
envisioned as a computer-based program to check all airline passengers'
names against terrorist watch lists before they board an airplane.
Airlines already check names against the lists and alert TSA officials when
a passenger's name appears similar to one on a watch list. The system has
led to thousands of false identifications. More than 30,000 people who are
not terrorists have asked TSA to remove their names from the lists since
Sept. 11, 2001.
The TSA for four years tried to develop a technology system to take over the
task of checking names against watch lists. The major contractors on the
project were IBM, Lockheed Martin and Eagle Force Associates. Also involved
in testing were Acxiom Corp., HNC Software, Infoglide Software, and Ascent
Technology.
In February, the Government Accountability Office found security
vulnerabilities with Secure Flight and it was suspended for retooling -
after $110 million had been spent.
Hawley said the project stalled because of debate about whether it should
try to identify unknown terrorists - which raises civil liberties concerns -
or simply match names against watch lists.
"That debate was played out," he said. "Congress said this is simply going
to be watch-list matching."
The Transportation Workers Identity Credential, or TWIC, is an ID card to be
issued to about 6 million longshoremen, mechanics, airport workers,
locomotive engineers and truck drivers - if they pass government background
checks. The card will use a biometric identifier - fingerprint or eye scan,
for example.
Bearing Point, a Virginia consulting firm, did the bulk of TWIC development
so far.
But years after the first cards were supposed to be issued, a contractor
hasn't been chosen, a technical standard hasn't been issued for the card
reader and regulations haven't been written to describe who will be required
to get the card.
On Friday, the GAO reported that TSA must test the program to make sure the
technology can work in harsh outdoor environments and that it won't delay
the movement of goods.
"That is moving along and it is going to work," said Hawley, adding that TSA
is pursuing a card that can be read without making physical contact with a
machine. "This is cutting-edge technology," he said.
Registered Traveler is supposed to be a smart card program for frequent
flyers in which they pay for a background check and a biometric ID card so
they can wait in shorter security lines.
The government tested Registered Traveler in five airports and let a private
company - Verified Identity Pass Inc. - test it in Orlando, Fla. Contractors
for the pilot project were Unisys and EDS.
Frequent flyers who enrolled in the test said they liked Registered
Traveler. The TSA found it didn't compromise security. The test, though, was
staged in so few airports that its benefits were limited.
The TSA pulled the plug on the government tests in September 2005 because
that year's funding ran out. Two months later TSA said Registered Traveler
would be up and running in June 2006. It would be turned over to a
consortium of private companies to develop and operate.
On Monday, Hawley said the TSA had decided Registered Traveler was a low
priority but that it would be ready by the end of November.
Some security experts say Congress never should have ordered the TSA to
undertake such complex information technology projects because they're far
more expensive than anyone imagined, and probably will not work as
envisioned.
"I blame Congress," said James Carafano, homeland security fellow at the
Heritage Foundation, a Washington think tank.
Congress dictates deadlines for untested projects without ever analyzing if
it is a good requirement or whether it can be accomplished, Carafano said.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
