http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/challenges.php?id=361269
Is California an Islamic Republic?
Stephen Schwartz
October 25, 2006
I am not a native Californian, but was taken there as a small child by my
parents, grew up there, and stayed, in all, 48 years, until 1999. From early
on, I was fascinated by the inscription on the state flag, "California
Republic." It obviously suggested that California is a country unto itself.
In elementary school, we were taught the brief history of the "Bear Flag"
Republic, as it was more commonly known, and which lasted for less than a
month in 1846. Many years went by, and in 1998 I published a book on
California history, titled From West to East, embodying my experience and
outlook on California's "separatist" identity. In 2003, I contributed an
essay on the state's progressive legacy, concluding with Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger's political gambit, to a volume edited by Brian Janiskee and
Ken Masugi, The California Republic.
The topic of California separatism is a fascinating one, but it gained a new
and unusual aspect on October 17, when the Saudi daily newspaper Okaz
published a startling interview. Hamza Yusuf Hanson, a convert to Islam, was
described as "the mufti of California." He complained to the Saudi paper
about American incomprehension of Islam as well as racism. (Hanson himself
is white.)
Few non-Muslims will understand the title "mufti" or the claim that it
expresses. A mufti is a religious judge, directing sharia courts in Sunni
Muslim countries. Muftis are appointed by or recognized by governments.
Because Islamic law is not standard in non-Muslim countries, only three of
the latter, all of which have significant Muslim majorities, have a mufti.
France, with six million Muslims, understandably has a mufti, Soheib
Bencheikh, of Algerian origin. Russia, with more than 20 million Muslims,
has a mufti, Talgat Tajuddin. Croatia, with a Croatian-Bosnian Muslim
community, has a mufti, as do other former-Yugoslav republics, such as
Slovenia, with Muslim minorities, but they lack governmental recognition.
Why would California have a mufti? Sharia governs such minor aspects of
Islamic life as the issuance of halal butchers' licenses, which are
comparable to certification of kosher meat by rabbis. Sharia also
determines the propriety of certain financial transactions between observant
Muslims, and many American and other Western banks, investment houses, and
related institutions have sharia consultants for the preparation of business
contracts by their Muslim clients.
But California has no sharia courts. California's Muslim population is about
one million, or 3.4 percent of the whole population, which does not justify
appointment of a mufti. How then does a major Saudi daily describe Hamza
Yusuf Hanson as "mufti of California?"
The most benevolent interpretation of this extraordinary incident must begin
with an unpleasant task - identifying Hamza Yusuf Hanson himself. Born of a
Catholic father and Greek Orthodox mother, Hanson became Muslim as a youth
and distinguished himself, until September 11, as one of the loudest, most
radical, vulgar, and provocative Islamist agitators in the West. In 1995,
Hanson delivered himself of the opinion that Judaism is "a most racist
religion." (No such condemnation appears in the Koran or in mainstream
Islamic theology, which honor the Jewish prophets.) On September 9, 2001,
Hanson declaimed in Los Angeles, "This country {America} unfortunately has a
great, a great tribulation coming to it. And much of it is already here,
yet people are too illiterate to read the writing on the wall."
With the passage of two days, of course, the world changed. Hamza Yusuf
Hanson saw the difficulties that would face radical Muslim preachers in the
West. He briskly reinvented himself as a peaceful, spiritual Sufi,
although he has never given any indication of a real knowledge of the Sufi
way or its cultural legacy. He also had the incredible luck to benefit
from cluelessness inside the Beltway, and got to meet President George W.
Bush. On the strength of that trivial encounter, he has built himself up as
a major Western Muslim leader, claiming now to be a "Bush adviser" as well
as the epitome of moderate Islam. Recently, he figured as a leading exponent
of a curious declaration of 38 Muslim scholars, directed to Pope Benedict
XVI, and which has gained considerable media attention.
Numerous Sufis and other moderate Muslims doubt that Hamza Yusuf Hanson has
really changed. One of the leading Sufis in the Muslim world told me
Hanson's "spiritual teaching" was New Age mush, suitable for daytime
television talk-shows but not for a real and distinguished mosque with a
long history of scholarship, moderation, and good relations between Shia and
Sunni Muslims as well as between Muslims and non-Muslims. Such is the mosque
in which my interlocutor (who shall remain anonymous) is the imam..
Is California an Islamic republic, with sharia courts and a state-recognized
mufti? Of course not.
Does Hamza Yusuf Hanson, a poseur living in California, fantasize that such
a reality will come about?
Of course. Even in his alleged Sufi incarnation, Hamza Yusuf Hanson
propagandizes for the Islamization of America.
Is "Islamic America" a mainstream Muslim principle? Of course not. Moderate
Muslims long ago accepted that the West is ruled by non-Muslims, and that
Muslims who emigrate to the West have to accept that fact. All religious
believers are proud of their faith, and many engage in proselytism. But
none except radical Muslims propose a wholesale transformation of Western
religious life. Mormons actively seek new members but do not proclaim that
some day soon the world, or even America , will be Mormon; nor do Jehovah's
Witnesses, or Christian Scientists. Nor, most important, do Catholics and
Protestants, who are the leading communities in America , and who certainly
accept converts. Nor do Buddhists, who are widely approached by religious
seekers. Born-again Christians do not declare that all Americans must some
day join their particular denominations. Jews do not proselytize at all.
It is one thing to argue that one's religion is the sure path to paradise.
It is quite another to argue that one's faith is the sole basis for good
governance on earth, or that its law should soon prevail in a country where
it now represents a small, mainly-immigrant minority. Normal Muslims,
aside from the ignorant and gullible, consider such views madness.
It is neither a mainstream nor a moderate Muslim position to claim, as Hamza
Yusuf's chief deputy, an individual named Ziad Shakir, did as recently as
June 18, 2006, in the pages of The New York Times: " 'Every Muslim who is
honest would say, I would like to see America become a Muslim country,' he
said." That means the great majority of Muslims, according to Hanson and
his cohort, are dishonest, because they, from Bosnia to Borneo and from
Algeria to Zanzibar, accept the non-Muslim religious identity of the West.
It is Hamza Yusuf Hanson who is dishonest, when he calls himself,
ridiculously, "the mufti of California," and when he claims to be a Muslim
moderate. He is neither, and it is time for mainstream media like The New
York Times to quit flattering him.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
