http://news.monstersandcritics.com/europe/printer_1213991.php

 

Interview: Europe risks becoming 'surveillance society', warns EU data
watchdog



Brussels - Europeans risk coming under permanent surveillance, if European
Union governments continue to meet US demands for access to personal data on
their nationals, the EU's data watchdog has warned. 

A recent transatlantic deal on sending key European air passenger data to
authorities in the United States 'is a slippery slope which shows a lot of
ambiguity and leaves room for much interpretation,' European Data Protection
Supervisor Peter Hustinx said in an interview with Deutsche Presse-Agentur
dpa. 

Hustinx, who monitors the processing of personal data by EU institutions,
has the power to take cases of privacy infringements to the EU Court of
Justice, the bloc's top legal body. 

As the data protection supervisor, he acts independently of EU institutions
and gives governments and EU bodies advice on security standards. 

Europeans did not want a so-called 'surveillance society,' said Hustinx,
warning the EU against gradually giving up privacy rights 'because once you
have given them up, you are not going to get them back.' 

The EU and the US earlier this month agreed on an interim accord which
allows intelligence and law enforcement agencies, including the CIA and the
FBI, to share and study European citizens' data more easily. 

Under the pact, European air carriers are obliged to give US authorities up
to 34 pieces of information on each passenger aboard America-bound flights.
The data includes credit card numbers, travel itineraries, addresses and
telephone numbers. 

Brussels says that under the new deal, citizens' privacy rights are fully
protected, arguing that Washington had given guarantees on how the data
would be used and by whom. 

But Hustinx said that the safeguards were either inadequate or left room for
much interpretation: 'What is the purpose of the whole exercise, what are
the data used for? What is the storage time? Is it done on a case-by-case
basis or routinely so?' 

Digital checks done before people cross borders must have 'sufficient focus
and proportionality plus adequate safeguards,' Hustinx said, adding: ''There
are certain systems that don't seem to match that.' 

The EU and the US will soon be back at the negotiating table for a permanent
pact to be in place by next July. Hustinx said that the bloc was already
facing 'a larger scope of data exchanges with diminishing detail' which left
little bargaining room for a new deal. 

Washington demands the data from European airlines as part of heightened
security measures after the September 11, 2001, attacks. The US has called
for more data sharing, claiming that European privacy concerns had
unreasonably hampered its counter-terrorism activities in the past few
years. 

Hustinx said that the US and the EU differed essentially in their
perceptions about privacy. While the US was showing a 'just-in-case
approach', seeking to avoid risks by obtaining and analysing as much data as
possible, Europe was trying to come up with proportionate measures. 

'Society needs to be safe but if we give up safeguards we're not sure that
this will add to our security,' Hustinx said. 'In the end we will not feel
more secure because we are being monitored all the time.' 

'The new member states have not become members of the EU to experience what
they experienced before,' he stressed. 

If monitoring international traffic meant that people walking on the street
'could be identified and arrested for things presumed to be true then that
reminds us of old times.' 

People who filled out a loyalty card from their local supermarket or gave
away personal data on the internet, were doing so voluntarily. But they had
no choice when dealing with data demands by governments, in particular with
foreign ones, Hustinx said. 

He also said that a controversial scheme to give bank transactions to US
officials investigating terror financing had raised the question of how far
national governments could be trusted. 

Since the September 11 attacks, the Belgium-based banking consortium Swift
has given US authorities access to its database. Swift is overseen by the
European Central Bank. 

'Every transaction monitored - is this the society we want to live in?'
Hustinx asked, adding: 'If this is an acceptable situation, is it an
approach that EU governments would copy, and if so, could we trust these
institutions?' 

Swift rejected criticism that it has violated EU privacy rights, saying it
had received strong US assurances that the data would be used exclusively
for terrorism investigations. 

With the EU and the US increasingly at odds over how to reconcile civil
liberties with the US-led fight against terrorism, the bloc needed new rules
which could give a 'guiding light in all these difficult issues in the near
future,' Hustinx said. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to