http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/06/world/middleeast/06trial.html?_r=1
<http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/06/world/middleeast/06trial.html?_r=1&n=Top%
2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fPeople%2fP%2fPreston%2c%20Julia&oref=slogin>
&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fPeople%2fP%2fPreston%2c%20Julia&oref=s
login


Hussein Trial Was Flawed but Reasonably Fair, and Verdict Was Justified,
Legal Experts Say 


By
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/p/julia_preston/
index.html?inline=nyt-per> JULIA PRESTON

New York Times

November 06, 2006

The yearlong trial that ended yesterday with a sentence of death by hanging
for
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/h/saddam_hussein
/index.html?inline=nyt-per> Saddam Hussein had serious legal flaws that left
doubts about whether he was allowed to present a full defense, international
legal experts said.

Lawyers and human rights advocates broadly agreed that the Iraqi tribunal's
proceedings frequently fell short of international standards for war crimes
cases. But even critics of the trial said the five Iraqi judges who heard
the case had made a reasonable effort to conduct a fair trial in the face of
sustained pressure from Iraqi political leaders for a swift death sentence.
American lawyers pointed to substantial evidence offered by the prosecution
implicating Mr. Hussein in the crimes against humanity with which he had
been charged.

"Did this meet the standards of international justice?" asked Jonathan
Drimmer, who teaches war crimes law at
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/g/georget
own_university/index.html?inline=nyt-org> Georgetown University Law Center
in Washington. "The answer is no. But to look at the ultimate verdict, it
certainly is consistent with the evidence presented."

Miranda Sissons, a senior associate at the International Center for
Transitional Justice, a group that has severely criticized some of the trial
proceedings, said, "This was not a sham trial," and added, "The judges are
doing their best to try this case to an entirely new standard for
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/ir
aq/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> Iraq." 

Mr. Hussein was accused along with seven co-defendants in the executions of
148 men and boys in Dujail, 35 miles north of Baghdad, in 1982. The mass
killings came after what was said to be an assassination attempt against the
Iraqi leader. 

Whether the trial is seen to have been fair is a vital issue for the United
States-backed Iraqi government. When the tribunal was created in December
2003, American and Iraqi officials hoped that it would advance the justice
system in Iraq, left moribund under Mr. Hussein, and would help bring some
reconciliation between the majority Shiites and minority Sunnis.

Since then the country has descended into factional strife. The trial was
fair enough to justify the elation yesterday among Iraqis who suffered under
Mr. Hussein's rule but also had enough defects that Mr. Hussein's Sunni
supporters, who dominated his government, could still contend that it had
been victor's justice, as Mr. Hussein's defense lawyers, led by Khalil
al-Dulaimi, said yesterday.

The trial was troubled by extreme security issues. Three defense lawyers
were assassinated.

Critics cited frequent efforts by Iraqi officials to speed up the trial and
influence its outcome. The first chief judge, Rizgar Muhammad Amin, an Iraqi
Kurd, resigned in January, saying he was tired of criticism from top Iraqi
officials of his handling of the case. A second judge who was in line to
succeed him was barred from becoming chief judge because he was said to have
had ties to Mr. Hussein's Baath Party, said human rights advocates who have
been following the trial. 

"The message by politicians and the executive has been quite unambiguously
that if the judges do not do what public expectation demands, they will be
in trouble," Ms. Sissons said. "Iraqi officials have sent the message, 'We
can reach into this court.' "

Raouf Rasheed Abdel-Rahman, who took over as chief judge and presided to the
end, was much less tolerant than his predecessor of outbursts by the
defendants, who challenged the legitimacy of the court. The chief judge
frequently allowed the prosecutor, Jaafar al-Mousawi, to summon evidence and
witnesses without first showing them to defense lawyers, violating a basic
tenet of trial fair play. 

"There was a certain amount of trial by ambush," said Richard Dicker, who
has been monitoring the trial for
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/h/human_r
ights_watch/index.html?inline=nyt-org> Human Rights Watch, a New York-based
group. 

On June 13, seemingly in a fit of impatience, Judge Abdel-Rahman abruptly
cut off the defense case. "There was a lack of impartiality and judicial
temperament" from Judge Abdel-Rahman, Mr. Dicker charged. 

However, several American criminal lawyers said the prosecution marshaled
surprisingly convincing documents, including those showing Mr. Hussein's
signature on orders of execution. "Saddam was convicted on the strength of
his own documents," said Michael Scharf, a professor at Case Western Reserve
University School of Law who advised the Iraqi tribunal during the trial.

But many trial observers were withholding final opinions yesterday because
the Iraqi judges had not issued their written judgment, a voluminous
document expected to come out this week. 

American lawyers in Iraq dismissed suspicions that the verdict had been
delayed to give the Bush administration a political victory in Iraq close to
Tuesday's elections. 

Accusations by Mr. Hussein's supporters that the trial was manipulated by
United States officials were not borne out, American lawyers who followed
the case said. An office organized by the United States Embassy helped the
tribunal with the investigation and provided legal and logistical
assistance. But the Iraqi judges frequently ignored their advice and
generally insisted on sticking with familiar procedures from the Iraqi
justice system.

"The U.S. government was not the puppet master of this tribunal," Mr. Scharf
said. 

Mr. Drimmer said that "the trial conduct was a step back from the kind of
international justice we had hoped for," and added, "But ultimately having
Saddam Hussein prosecuted in a transparent proceeding is a major step for
Iraq."

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to