http://counterterrorismblog.org/newslinks/upload/2006/11/PRISM%20no%206%20vo
l%204%20-%20Fatwa%20on%20Saddam%20Hussein.pdf

 

The Project for the Research of Islamist Movements (PRISM) Herzliya, ISRAEL
www.e-prism.org 1 


Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center 


THE PROJECT FOR THE RESEARCH OF ISLAMIST MOVEMENTS (PRISM) 


OCCASIONAL PAPERS 


Volume 4 (2006), Number 6 (November 2006) 

Director: Reuven Paz 

The Project for the Research of Islamist Movements is part of the Global
Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center. Site: www.e-prism.org.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] All material copyright Reuven Paz unless
otherwise stated. Credit if quoting; ask permission to reprint. GLORIA is
part of the Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, ISRAEL 

****----*****----*****----*****----*****----*****----**** Abstract: This is
a series of papers that translate and analyze articles, reports, religious
decrees, and other documents, written primarily in Arabic by Islamist
scholars, clerics, operatives, or intellectuals. 

Making the Beast Kosher: 

A Jihadi Fatwa on Saddam Hussein’s Death Sentence 

By Reuven Paz 

Introduction 

It took only an hour or so after the direct broadcast of Saddam Hussein’s
death sentence for the supporters of global Jihad to post in the main
Jihadi-Salafi forum—Al-Hesbah—a well-reasoned fatwa if to regard him a
Martyr (Shahid) in Jihadi-Salafi eyes.1 The fatwa by the Jihadi-Salafi
Kuwaiti Sheikh Hamed al-Ali, has been probably written before the expected
sentence. 

Sheikh Hamed al-Ali can be viewed today as the leading living scholar of the
younger generation of Jihadi-Salafiyyah in Arabia, after the death and
imprisonment of some of his Saudi colleagues. He is very popular within the
“Jihadi virtual community” on the Internet, and his residency in Kuwait
seems to provide him some more freedom. Despite his arrest for a short while
two years ago, it seems that the Kuwaiti authorities do not limit his
freedom of speech, as long as he does not attack them. Only last week Al-Ali
was “crowned” by one of the leading clerics of the older generation of
Jihadi-Salafis—Abu Basir al-Tartousi in London. On November 1st 2006,
Al-Tartousi posted on the front page of his web site an extraordinary letter
in support for Al-Ali.2 In the past year, Abu Basir has regained his senior
position among Jihadi-Salafi circles, after a harsh criticism over him
following his positions 

1 See the fatwa on-line in:
http://www.al-hesbah.org/v/showthread.php?t=94491 and in:
http://www.e-prism.org/images/Hamed_al-Ali_-_Fatwa_about_Saddam_sentence_-_5
_Nov06.pdf 

2 See the letter on-line in:
http://www.abubaseer.bizland.com/refutation/read/f%2081.doc 




The Project for the Research of Islamist Movements (PRISM) Herzliya, ISRAEL
www.e-prism.org 2 

against the suicide operations in London in July 2005, and his hinted
criticism over Zarqawi’s extremist Takfiri doctrines in Iraq. The killing of
Zarqawi in June 2006, the takeover by Dr. Ayman Zawahiri of directing
Al-Qaeda in Iraq, and the absence of leading imprisoned scholars such as Abu
Muhammad al-Maqdisi, Abu Qutadah, and the Saudi Suleiman al-`Alawan from the
Jihadi scene, assisted Abu Basir to regain his senior position. The public
“letter of decoration” to Hamed al-Ali is a kind of transferring “the torch”
to the younger generation of Jihadi-Salafi clerics, whose fatwas are vital
for Al-Qaeda and affiliated groups, and their supporters. Therefore, the
present fatwa by Hamed al-Ali on Saddam Hussein should be regarded
important, not only in reference to the Jihadi-Salafis, but also for the
future relations between the various components of the Iraqi Sunni
insurgency. 

Saddam Hussein in Jihadi-Salafi eyes 

The attitude towards Saddam Hussein has been controversial in Jihadi-Salafi
circles since early 2003, on the eve of the collapse of his regime and later
on his arrest. On one hand it was obvious that Saddam was a “Pharaoh”—the
highest degree of an apostate ruler—like most of the Arab dictators and
rulers. His animosity towards the Islamic movements in Iraq, and his Ba`athi
regime and ideology turned him into an enemy, more than the killing of
innocent Shi’is or Kurds. Yet, he was threatened and then removed by the
“Greater Satan”—the Crusader-Zionist conspiracy—and was fighting another
Satan—the Iranian Safawids—and therefore, was also perceived as a kind of
defender of the Arab-Muslim honor and Caliphate. He also had a history of
fighting the United States in 1991. Therefore, he was an enemy, but not an
immediate one compare to the Americans. Many of the Jihadis also stuck to
the rule of the Prophet that “a corrupted or unjust ruler is always better
than no ruler, what might lead to chaos or civil war – Fitnah. 

As the Iraqi Jihadi insurgency emerged, there were very few references to
Saddam Hussein by Jihadi-Salafis, especially that the Sunni insurgency
involved many volunteers from Arab countries who had no special attitude
towards him. Later on there was a start of involvement of Saddam loyalists,
remains of the old Iraqi military forces, and ex-Ba`athi members, in forming
insurgent groups that fought under the same doctrinal strategy as Al-Qaeda
or other Salafi Iraqi groups. In the past year, under Al-Qaeda leadership,
the insurgency formed a strong anti-Shi’i notion and became also part of a
kind of Sunni Iraqi nationalism vis-à-vis the Shi’is and the Kurds. This
process, in addition to a certain more human image of Saddam the prisoner in
court, and the rage over the instability of the country as a result of the
American occupation, may have softened the animosity towards Saddam in the
past. In the period of 2004-2006 we could find some sympathetic writings on
Saddam Hussein in Jihadi forums. However, these writings might have been
written by non-Iraqi supporters of global Jihad. 

The Fatwa – Should Saddam be a Shahid? 

Hamed al-Ali’s fatwa is a response to a question how to relate to Saddam if
he is executed by the enemy, knowing his past acts against his people, his
being a dictator, and since he did not 




The Project for the Research of Islamist Movements (PRISM) Herzliya, ISRAEL
www.e-prism.org 3 

resist the Americans and surrendered. It is unknown whether the person who
asked the question, if there is one at all, is an Iraqi. 

At the beginning of the fatwa Al-Ali tries to avoid a direct answer or to
direct his readers to a certain conclusion, claiming that “it is not our
task to decide, but Allah’s.” However, he provides Saddam with
“circumstantial discounts” – we do not know if Saddam is still an infidel
Ba`athi or changed his mindset; we do not know the real circumstances of his
arrest, but only the American version, which we cannot trust since they are
“our worst enemy”; he was probably drugged by gas before his arrest; Saddam
acts were within the hostility between us and the enemy; Saddam’s “crimes”
were done before the invasion of Kuwait. At that period he was not viewed as
enemy or criminal by the West. They did so only when he endangered their oil
interests; all the Arab rulers shared his crimes and should be tried with
him; the United States removed Mussadek in Iran when he wanted to
nationalize the Iranian oil and supported the Shah instead. Later on they
supported Saddam and encouraged him in his war against Iran under Khomeini,
and supplied him with every weapon possible. This was the period when he
used chemical weapons against the Kurds. Later on the Americans seduced him
to occupy Kuwait in order that they could occupy Arabia and then Iraq, as
happened in fact. Therefore, all the Arab rulers share these crimes with
Saddam and he should not be the only one to be tried. Moreover, many more
Kurds were killed as a result of the internal conflicts within the Kurds
between the Barazanis and the Talebanis than by Saddam Hussein, but many
people do not know that, since they are misled by the Western propaganda. 

Al-Ali’s conclusion is that the Jihadis should acknowledge two elements: 

• Everything that took place in the Arab history in the past century,
without exception, is a result of the strategy and policy of the imperialist
“Zionized Crusaders.” Hence, all the policies of the Arab despots and
dictators are also a result of this imperialism. 

• The Muslims can change these circumstances only by returning to their true
religion. They should target their war to their real historic and strategic
enemy and expel them from their lands. The Muslims should not let the enemy
affect them through its false propaganda and divert them from the core of
their strategic conflict. 

 

In other words – do not let the enemy engage us in issues such as Saddam
Hussein’s crimes instead of the real problem. 

Al-Ali’s conclusion is to leave the issue to Allah, who has already punished
Saddam Hussein in this world, by his removal, killing his sons, the loss of
his fortune, etc. Now Saddam is dependent upon Allah’s mercy. However,
Al-Ali wishes him such a mercy. He does not declare Saddam a Shahid in case
of his execution, but wishes Allah to forgive him and accept him in haven
not hell. 




The Project for the Research of Islamist Movements (PRISM) Herzliya, ISRAEL
www.e-prism.org 4 

Conclusion 

Al-Ali’s fatwa reflects a forgiving attitude on one hand, and a change that
took place in the Arab world on the background of the occupation of Iraq and
the situation there, where stability, even a vicious one, was replaced by
what is viewed by them a hopeless reality that might tear Iraq into at least
three pieces. Among the first responses to the sentence we should also note
that all the Islamic movements from the school of the Muslim Brotherhood
condemned the sentence as well, including the less anti-American Hamas, and
the Iraqi Brotherhood (the Iraqi Islamic Party), which supports the
democratic process in Iraq. 

Al-Ali did not fully answer the question and left the Martyrdom issue to
Allah to decide. However, he used a very softened tone that might sound to
his Jihadi-Salafi followers as an opposition to the sentence, and a kind of
defense on Saddam Hussein, who in his terms, acted according to the norms of
the other Arab dictators, who were tools in the hands of the
“Zionist-Crusader” plot against Islam and the Muslims. 

But, the more important implications of this fatwa should be viewed on the
background of the present Iraqi scene, especially among the Iraqi Sunnis.
The fatwa sends a message to the non-Jihadi groups that take part in the
Iraqi Sunni insurgency, that Al-Qaeda is open to cooperation with any Sunni
element that is fighting the real enemy – the United States and the Shi`ah.
Saddam Hussein the individual is not important and all the Jihadis can do is
wishing him the mercy of Allah. He is not declared a Shahid but they do not
oppose it if Allah accepts his repentance. However, he is not an enemy, an
infidel, or a cruel dictator. He is just a victim of the global plot against
the Muslims, who has already been punished in this world, unlike the other
Arab rulers. 

Just few weeks ago Al-Qaeda declared the foundation of a “Sunni Islamic
independent State.” For some reason, this declaration has not gained almost
any notice in the Western media, which may view it as a pretentious episode.
However, whoever carefully reads the Jihadi-Salafi forums in the last
months, can see how keen are ALL the various Sunni Iraqi insurgent groups to
use these Jihadi forums as a platform for their messages and indoctrination,
regardless of their disputes, competition, or different original ideology.
No matter how serious the “Islamic State” is, there seems to be a notion of
more united strategy among the Sunni groups. The fatwa of Hamed al-Ali
provides this notion a better chance from the side of the Jihadi-Salafis. 




 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to