http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/11/world/middleeast/11spend.html?_r=1&bl&ex=1166072400&en=0cecd9c762e2f4da&ei=5087%0A&oref=slogin

Iraq Is Failing to Spend Billions in Oil Revenues

BAGHDAD, Dec. 10 --- Iraq is failing to spend billions of dollars of oil 
revenues that have been set aside to rebuild its damaged roads, schools 
and power stations and to repair refineries and pipelines.

  Iraqi ministries are spending as little as 15 percent of the 2006 
capital budgets they received for the rebuilding --- with some of the 
weakest spending taking place at the Oil Ministry, which relies on 
damaged and frequently sabotaged pipelines and pumping stations to move 
the oil that provides nearly all of the country's revenues. In essence, 
the money is available --- despite extensive sabotage, the oil money is 
flowing --- but the Iraqi system has not been able to put it to work.

The country is facing this national failure to spend even as American 
financial support dwindles. Among reasons for the problems --- like a 
large turnover in government personnel --- is a strange new one: 
bureaucrats are so fearful and confused by anticorruption measures put 
in place by the American and Iraqi governments that they are afraid to 
sign off on contracts.

The inability to spend the money raises serious questions for the 
government, which has to demonstrate to citizens who are skeptical and 
suspicious of government corruption that it can improve basic services, 
and that at a time when American funds for reconstruction are being 
reduced, it can prove to other foreign donors that it can quickly put to 
use the money they may be willing to commit.

After the expenditure of roughly $22 billion in American taxpayer 
dollars on Iraq reconstruction, the increase of the Iraqi capital budget 
was seen by many as a sign that oil revenues could finally begin paying 
for the rebuilding, four years after Bush administration predictions 
that the country could afford the program on its own.

Iraq's overall capital budget in 2006 was nine trillion Iraqi dinars, or 
about $6 billion, said Abdulbasit Turki Saeed, president of the Iraqi 
Board of Supreme Audit and a member of the Iraqi cabinet's economic 
committee.

But Mr. Saeed said that across the entire government, only about 20 
percent of the capital budget had been spent, according to the 
committee's recent figures. A senior Western official agreed with that 
estimate.

"It's slow. It's disappointing," the Western official said, speaking on 
the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the 
subject publicly. "In general, they have had trouble getting projects 
started."

The problem was briefly acknowledged in the report last week by the 
bipartisan Iraq Study Group, which gave similar figures for capital 
expenditures and said that "many ministries can do little more than pay 
salaries."

In interviews, alarmed Western and Iraqi officials sought to put the 
best face on the problem, saying they thought that the pace of spending 
had picked up in the last two to three months as the government began 
taking steps to improve its performance.

Those officials said that in a nation with reconstruction needs around 
every corner, the puzzling phenomenon of unspent money was partly 
explained by the rapid turnover in governments, security woes, endemic 
corruption and a lack of technocrats skilled at jobs like writing 
contracts and managing complex projects. In short, nearly all the ills 
that have undermined the American rebuilding program seem to be plaguing 
the Iraqi one.

Hussain al-Shahristani, the Iraqi oil minister, said he thought that he 
could spend substantially more of this year's budget if he could resolve 
administrative bottlenecks, like Finance Ministry delays in authorizing 
payments.

"It's the bureaucracy," Mr. Shahristani said. "Particularly financial 
people take too long to change their old habits."

But some American and Iraqi officials here are also saying that the 
stringent measures they had favored to slow the rampant corruption may 
be especially daunting for bureaucrats who have little experience with 
Western-style regulations and oversight. Those officials say that Iraqis 
who have seen their colleagues arrested and jailed in anticorruption 
sweeps are reluctant to put their own name on a contract.

"As it's applied right now, this new thing scares the hell out of 
everybody," one Western official here said.

The colliding priorities of oversight and spending have left American 
and Iraqi officials in a quandary as they work behind the scenes on the 
so-called "Compact with Iraq" --- the centerpiece of the American 
Embassy's effort to create economic and political milestones that this 
nation promises to meet in exchange for pledges of foreign investment 
and support.

Anticorruption officials themselves are facing a loss of support, with 
the most serious impact felt by Rathi al-Rathi, the head of Iraq's 
Commission on Public Integrity, who has been privately accused by 
Western and Iraqi officials of zealotry, political bias and other failings.

A previously undisclosed letter to Mr. Rathi from prime minister Nuri 
Kamal al-Maliki, dated Sept. 6, is close to an accusation that Mr. Rathi 
himself is guilty of corruption. The letter, a copy of which was 
provided to The New York Times, directs him to account for what the 
prime minister asserts are hundreds of thousands of dollars of 
undocumented expenses by the commission.

Ali al-Shabot, a spokesman for Mr. Rathi, who was traveling last week, 
at first insisted that the letter was secret and that he could not 
discuss it. But finally he dismissed its charges as based on bad 
information. Mr. Shabot indicated there was at least one good reason 
that, despite the pressure, the commission would remain in business. He 
confidently pointed out that international donors who provide financing 
to Iraq do so "with the guarantee that there are institutions to oversee 
the money."

While it is clear that new financial support is unlikely without a 
strong anticorruption campaign in place, Iraq's inability to spend its 
own money undermines the message that the country will actually be able 
to use the support if provided.

"People we are trying to deal with and obtain additional funds for Iraq 
will come back and say, 'Iraq is not spending its own resources,' " said 
Yahia Said, a research fellow at the London School of Economics who is 
working as a consultant to the United Nations on the compact.

Mr. Shahristani, the oil minister, who has put new anticorruption 
measures in place on top of those imposed from the outside, said the 
solution was to teach the bureaucrats how to cope with the new rules.

"Obviously I've heard of these complaints," he said of the criticisms of 
the anticorruption organizations. "I don't think that they have gone too 
far. I think this is necessary given the level of corruption that we 
have inherited."

Iraq's total budget is about $32 billion in 2006 and is projected to be 
more than $40 billion in 2007, said Bayan Jabr, the Iraqi finance 
minister, in an interview. Most of the budget, which comes almost 
entirely from oil revenues, is consumed in operating expenses, including 
roughly $8 billion for ministry salaries and pensions and $6 billion for 
Iraq's socialist-style food and fuel subsidies.

The nation has spent those funds much more easily than it has spent the 
$6 billion for capital improvements --- a number that by some projections 
could roughly double next year in view of Iraq's vast infrastructure needs.

According to a report by the Oil Ministry, about half of the money was 
to go for repair of pipelines, building refineries, improving oil 
fields, repairs on export terminals, and other improvements to the oil 
industry. The remainder was to be spent on projects ranging from 
improving the electrical system to irrigation systems to roads and 
government buildings of various types.

The same report says that, for example, Iraq is in need of major new oil 
storage tanks, a 42-inch-diameter pipeline in the south and better 
electrical generation to run the oil pumps.

Officials are still sorting out what went wrong in the early months of 
the 2006 program, but some of the problems were similar in kind if not 
in detail to the ones that derailed major portions of the American effort.

First, after the December 2005 elections, politicians jockeyed for 
ministerial posts for months, creating uncertainty about whether 
priorities would change, and then the newly seated officials were 
unfamiliar with their jobs. At the same time, deepening security 
problems not only made purchasing and construction difficult, but also 
continued to drive skilled midlevel ministry employees out of the country.

Final numbers across the ministries will not be available until year's 
end, but Mr. Jabr, the finance minister, said that a few trends had 
emerged. Expenditures at the Housing and Construction Ministry and the 
Oil Ministry were low, while at the other end of the spectrum, the 
Electricity and Water Resources Ministries were spending as much as 
three-quarters of their allocations.

But the overall picture is clear, said Lt. Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, who 
as commander of the Multi-National Security Transition Command-Iraq 
works extensively with the Interior and Defense Ministries, which he 
expects to spend about half of their capital budgets this year.

"I think the government of Iraq has got a challenge writ large," General 
Dempsey said. "The 27 ministries will not execute their 2006 budgets."

American and Iraqi officials are already taking steps to improve the 
situation, streamlining the contracting process, giving training 
sessions on the process to ministry employees and, Mr. Jabr said, 
putting in place measures to penalize ministries that do not spend money 
fast enough.

General Dempsey said the unspent money in the security ministries in 
2006 would not be lost, because Iraq had agreed to allow the funds to be 
held in the same foreign accounts that are used to coordinate the 
Pentagon's military purchases until the agencies were ready to use it.

As the financial and political stakes rise within the Iraqi-financed 
rebuilding program, few officials have escaped blame.

The public integrity commission is cited most often as intimidating. But 
those who deal with investigations of questionable deals and officials 
on the take in a historically corrupt country are not surprised by those 
complaints. "This is normal," said Mr. Shabot, the integrity commission 
spokesman. "They hate us because we are monitoring them."

Mr. Jabr expressed deep impatience with ministry officials who, he said, 
told him that part of the reason they were moving so slowing was to 
avoid running afoul of the integrity commission.

"I said, 'Why are you afraid? If you are not a thief, don't be afraid,' 
" Mr. Jabr recalled.

+++



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to