http://www.jordantimes.com/wed/opinion/opinion2.htm
Undermining democracy, again, in Palestine Hasan Abu Nimah The PLO Executive Committee's recommendation that Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas call for early elections, both for his post and for the legislative council, is ill-advised and wrong. The Palestinian Legislative Council was elected less than a year ago. It barely had a chance to function, due to the Western-backed boycott and to the fact that Israel has kidnapped and is holding hostage large numbers of its elected members. But to dissolve it now would be a prescription for additional turmoil and political conflict. The idea of dissolving the Hamas-led government and the PLC has been contemplated (and declared) by Abbas for a long time. Abbas, his local cronies in the Fateh movement, and the foreign powers which encourage and support them, have never reconciled themselves to the fact that Hamas won the PLC election fair and square. Rather than stand aside and allow Hamas to govern, as the rules of democracy dictate, they have hatched various plans to try to overthrow the Hamas Cabinet and replace it with one to their liking. In order to disguise the blatantly undemocratic nature of this effort, Abbas has been seeking ways to make the attempt to remove Hamas appear legal. But one major obstacle is that the law developed by Palestinians under occupation does not grant Abbas the power to dissolve the legislature. He had hoped that the international siege, Fateh-organised strikes and other forms of pressure would force Hamas out. Instead, Hamas seems to be doing much better than expected. The strikes are crumbling, and Hamas has gained sufficient international support and financing to begin to counteract the effects of the siege. So now, the so-called "institution of the presidency", the EU and US-backed shadow government made up of Abbas and his numerous advisers, are racing against time. Hence, the engineered "recommendation" by the unaccountable and unelected PLO Executive Committee to dissolve the democratically elected legislature. The new theory is that if Abbas does not have the power to call an election for the PLC, by resigning he would trigger one automatically. Even this is not true, based on precedent. When Yasser Arafat died, elections were held only for his office. Nevertheless, Abbas' apparent willingness to stage new elections indicates a certain confidence that his discredited party, which failed to win the elections even though it had millions of dollars in secret support from foreign sources, can now win. That is a possibility, but what if Hamas wins the elections again? And what guarantee does the "institution of the presidency" have for the planned results unless the outcome of the elections is to be decided beforehand: this kind of democracy. All these underhanded manoeuvres are being wrapped up in the claim that there is a "national crisis" and therefore the people should decide on the way out. But this is totally manufactured. The crisis exists only because Fateh refuses to recognise the clear result of the election: it lost. More importantly, it refuses to recognise that Hamas won on the basis of a political programme which is radically different from its own, including an end to the corruption and defeatism that Fateh made the hallmark of the Palestinian Authority since that body was established in 1994 under the Oslo accords. As soon as it was elected, Fateh colluded with a Western campaign to force Hamas to adopt its failed policies, above all to unconditionally recognise Israel's right to exist as a racist state, without defined borders, but with illegally annexed Arab lands and annexed Jerusalem --- a state which gives special, superior rights to one group of people based on their religion. Hamas refused these conditions, but did not shut the door to a reasonable accommodation with Israel. What it rejected was the same path of sterile negotiations, which, after more than a decade, left the Palestinians with even less than before, as rapacious Israeli colonists gobbled up their land. Hamas won the right to redefine the terms of negotiations so that Palestinian rights and interests, not Israeli ones, guide Palestinian participation in any peace process. Actually redefining the terms has become an absolute necessity, after the mess and the endless concessions the PA had offered, for redirecting the straying course of the peace process. Yet, by refusing to again unconditionally recognise the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state (there have been many similar Palestinian recognitions before), as well as the other agreements reached previously between Israel and the Palestinians (none of which Israel ever respected), Hamas was declared unfit to remain in office and, consequently, was subjected to an international boycott led by Israel's blindly supporting so-called international community. Instead of the Palestinian Authority president's rejecting the boycott and the collective punishment of his people and of the government which he appointed and was sworn in before him, he joined the boycotters. He allowed and even encouraged foreign visitors and foreign governments to avoid the Palestinian government and its Cabinet members. He also encouraged the trend of dealing and showing willingness to only deal with, and give money to, the "presidency" and not the government. By acquiescing, obviously willingly, to this trend, he legitimised the boycott, encouraged it and gave it full cover, thus shifting the blame entirely to Hamas for its failure to understand "the language of the international community". That "language" of duplicity, injustice and sheer hypocrisy was never questioned. Instead of tacitly helping the boycott and collective punishment of the Palestinian people for practising their right to elect a government, and blaming Hamas for it, Abbas should have stood by his government, declaring his unwavering objection to dealing with the Palestinians as two factions, the good and the bad, the moderate and the "terrorist". He should have refused, and should have instructed his numerous advisers, to refuse to meet any foreign official or to conduct any business on behalf of the government in office, especially when the intention was to consolidate the boycott and sideline the government. Such a dignified, and indeed a correct stand would have discouraged the boycott, and probably would have caused its quick collapse, and saved the Palestinians. It could have solved the problem in a way more compatible with the Palestinian interests. What Abbas and his Fateh party have chosen instead, sadly, is to inflict more harm on their people and their elected representatives. What they seem to be choosing now is to plunge an already risky situation in further turmoil. That should never be an option. +++ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/