http://www.thedailystar.net/2006/12/23/d61223020327.htm

Islam, Muslims and the European media
Muhammad Zamir

Recent statements by Pope Benedict XVI, Mr J Straw, a former senior 
member of the British Cabinet, and current British Communities Minister 
Phil Woolas have all reflected a common thread of thought -- anxiety 
about the growing presence of Islam within the body-fabric of Europe. 
Their comments have highlighted not only the sociological impact of 
Muslims within Europe but also questioned whether fundamental values, 
part of the Islamic faith, have any relevance for the host community.

The Western media, for obvious reasons, have followed this growing 
debate with great interest. This in turn has created and determined 
public perceptions about Islam and Muslims. It has also generated its 
own fall-out in local politics. Evidence of this has already become 
apparent in Netherlands and France. The latest local elections in 
Belgium have also been tarred with the same brush. One of the political 
parties in this election has gone to the extent of stating in its 
manifesto that examination is required as to whether Islam is to be 
treated as a recognised religion.

This view appears to have coincided with the media trend that Islam, as 
a religion is not only political in character but violent in its 
manifestations. As expected, this has fuelled anti-Muslim sentiment and 
racist incidents.

The media, both electronic and print, have an indispensable place in the 
West. They modulate and create brands by which group-images are enhanced 
or destroyed.

Unfortunately, in recent years, there has been a noticeable and gradual 
shift in the tone of media coverage with regard to Islam and Muslims. In 
this context, the media appears to have found a limited agenda. It is 
rarely positive and focuses almost exclusively on the involvement of 
Islam in politics and violence. Human interest articles which reflect 
everyday life in Islam and in Muslim countries have practically 
disappeared from the scene. Nowadays, in general, little attention is 
paid by the western media to the history and centuries-old relationship 
between the Middle East and Europe. I find this very disappointing.

It would appear that one of the major barriers to 'realistic' reporting 
has arisen out of the superficial media misconception that Islam is a 
political rather than a religious ideology. What started after the 
Iranian Revolution in 1978 has now grown more intense after the events 
of 11 September, 2001.

Today, most of the issues concerning Muslims within Europe relate to 
their integration as well as their cultural values. There is also the 
tendency to portray Muslims as a problem group which needs to be 
integrated into broader society. The media, in general, play an 
important role in this regard. Consequently, it was not surprising that 
the comments of Straw and Woolas created such a storm. Both of them 
touched a sensitive chord. Straw was slightly general in his 
observation, but Woolas more specific, questioning whether 'Muslim women 
wear the veil as an expression of their faith or because they are 
compelled to do so.' In doing so, both ministers reflected the unease of 
British politicians over the issue of integrating Britain's 1.65 million 
Muslims (which has been high on the domestic political agenda since the 
bombings of July, 2005).

The British media have loved these comments from the two senior 
politicians. They tended to display a form of dual track "enlightened 
Islamophobia." Subsequent observations have tried to emphasise that 
European Muslim communities should not be confused with radical Islam. 
The benefit of such comments has however been lost and undermined 
through politicised reporting of Islamic issues in other articles.

One can only observe that in such situations, journalists instead of 
practising self-regulation are often ending up with oversimplification 
of complex political and cultural issues.

Inaccurate media representations are also beginning to create mistrust 
between Muslim communities and journalists. An example in this regard 
was the relentless media coverage of one radical cleric in the UK. This 
created the unfortunate impression that most Muslim clerics might be 
associated with terrorists. Such unfounded assumptions even prompted 
proposals for laws to close down mosques in the UK. Fortunately, Great 
Britain is a functioning democracy and such moves did not succeed.

One thing is however very clear. There is consensus among Muslim 
community leaders all over Europe that journalists need to understand 
the complexity of community issues and also take steps to present not 
only a more positive image of Muslim communities in Europe but also a 
basic knowledge of the issues central to Islam. There is also general 
agreement that journalists should not attribute individual acts to the 
collective Muslim community, but should differentiate between acts 
associated with Muslim culture and those related to the Islamic religion.

Jörg Reckmann, Brussels correspondent for the 'Frankfurter Rundschau', 
has recently made some interesting comments with regard to Islam, 
Muslims and the media. He has pointed out that before 9/11 few people 
cared about Islam in Europe. This changed after the terrorist attacks in 
the USA and on European soil. After this, Islam and the Middle East were 
no longer romantic or remote. They were factors that affected security 
and stability in daily lives.

Mr. Reckmann has analysed this scenario and reflected that this 
development has been treated differently by quality and tabloid media. 
The former has been capable of putting forward a nuanced and 
representative perspective. Tabloids, on the other hand, by their very 
nature (arousing curiosity among mass readers) and also because of 
popular journalism, have tended to be less hesitant in calling the glass 
half-empty when it could have been called half-full. This has often 
affected the perception of the true situation. In this context, Reckmann 
has suggested that the key role for journalists should be to explain the 
changes in Europe, and seek to understand them, in a critical, yet 
unbiased way. I agree with him. There is bound to be media distortion 
and absence of balance unless this takes place.

Another factor is also beginning to affect media perception. It is the 
use of controversial terms by the political leadership. An example of 
this has been the recent use of the phrase 'Islamic fascism'. This 
immediately influenced media coverage of Islamic issues and events 
related to the Muslim community. I think that linking Islam with fascism 
is as reprehensible as using the term 'Christian terrorism' or 'Jewish 
terrorism' to describe violence by other fundamentalist groups.

To this can also be added the pressure generated by 24-hour news 
channels. Need for new stories and 'breaking events' on a continuous 
basis often lead to a blurring of the distinction between tabloid and 
quality news. Fiction and subjectivity creep in and negative images of 
Muslims continue to haunt the air-waves for hours. A theft or a robbery 
by an Asian Muslim is then no longer just another incident. It becomes a 
societal and ethnic indictment.

The other emerging elements are online blogs and discussion forums. This 
indirect expansion of media 'space' is also generating in its own way, 
influence with western communities.

I feel that this gradual erosion of self-confidence within the Muslim 
communities is dangerous. The political leadership and European civil 
society have a difficult task ahead. They have to take the initiative to 
persuade the media not to lump together Islam's cultural and religious 
aspects with political issues. One way out would be to urge the media to 
focus more on human-interest stories to counter-balance the association 
of religion with violence and conflict.

Although media is totally free in the West, pressure could still be 
applied in this regard on editors rather than on the journalists to 
broaden the Muslim agenda.

A good way to tackle this problem might be to emulate the manner in 
which China is positively reflected in the media. Few news stories today 
focus on China's authoritarian government. More than 50 per cent of 
stories justifiably highlight its new-found economic power.

However, tackling the boon or being the bane of media attention also 
rests with the Muslim communities in Europe and in other western 
countries. Being emotional will not solve the problem.

Improving the image of Islam and Muslims could also be helped through 
introspection within the Muslim community. Muslims have to act and speak 
responsibly, reflecting and upholding their values and professionalism 
in an informed way. Dialogues between Muslim representatives and 
journalists and other stake-holders could also be helpful in removing 
prejudice, combating stereotyping and promoting mutual understanding.

Muhammad Zamir is a former Secretary and Ambassador who can be reached 
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

+++



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to