http://www.rabble.ca/rabble_interview.shtml?x=56462

 



U.S. Democrats face tough choices


 


 


 

 

 


 

 

 



Most commentary on the George W. Bush decision to send an additional 20,000
troops to Iraq has focused on the military and foreign policy consequences
of the decision. Many doubt the wisdom of trying to pacify Iraq by having
more hands hold more guns. Others point out that American capacity to act in
the world will be diminished by escalation of the Iraq conflict. 

The impact of the Bush decision on the U.S. itself has received less
attention. But with a Republican President now facing a Democratic Congress,
throughout the last two years of his mandate, the impact of U.S. imperial
actions on domestic U.S. politics is bound to become more important. 

Bush has lost public support for his Iraq adventure, as public opinion
polling shows. More importantly, the overall costs of the Bush foreign
policy have yet to be understood by the American people. Congress needs to
focus on the financial consequences for Americans of the Iraq debacle. It's
the most prescient example of the costs to the U.S. of trying to run the
world from Washington. 

Observers generally consider the U.S. to be rich country, albeit with a lot
of poor people. Few question U.S. prosperity, and often the American
economic model is held up as one to be emulated, not least in Canada, where
the article lamenting Canada's inferior productivity performance, compared
to the U.S., has been a journalistic staple for decades. 

What is less widely appreciated is the role foreign lending to the U.S.
plays in financing U.S. economic expansion, and the U.S. military
expenditures abroad, including in Iraq. Europeans readily add to large
portfolios of U.S. stocks and bonds, helping out the U.S. economy. The
central banks of China, Japan and other Asian countries have been steadily
accumulating mountains of U.S. government debt. All this foreign lending to
the U.S. underwrites American domestic consumption, and foreign policy
adventures. 

Funding American debt would seem to make sense, because the foreign consumer
goods bought by Americans come from Asia and Europe. But the persistent
foreign borrowing by the U.S. weakens confidence in the U.S. dollar that
looks to decline in value. The poor public standing of Bush, coupled with no
end in sight to the Iraq war, erodes overseas confidence in the American
administration. 

There will come a day when foreign lenders no longer pony up to support the
U.S. dollar. By then Bush may be on his way back to Crawford, Texas for
good. In the meantime the Democratic Congress should be asking how the U.S.
is going to adjust when the foreign lending is no longer available. 

The short answer is the fabled U.S. middle class is going to see its living
standards erode. Interest rate hikes will be needed to keep the U.S. dollar
from sinking out of sight, generating a recession, and stock market losses.
The wealthy will escape; the average income earners will be hard hit. 

The rest of the world will suffer along with the U.S. middle class.
Countries, such as Canada, which have been so imprudent as to build an
economic strategy around sales to the U.S., will be sure to suffer
disproportionately. 

U.S. spending has to be curtailed because the rest of the world is not going
to fund U.S. foreign deficits indefinitely. The Americans can choose to
reduce consumer spending, and continue to maintain their overseas empire,
and to fight on in Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan and elsewhere. Or, Congress can
decide to rein in the imperial presidency and take back its constitutional
role overseeing U.S. foreign relations. This would allow for re-investment
in domestic health care, education, social housing and income support. 

The U.S. conduct of the war in Iraq is about a lot more than bad U.S.
foreign policy and military strategy. The failure in Iraq throws world U.S.
leadership into question. Americans, along with the rest of the world, will
pay for the leadership follies in reduced economic circumstances. 

The time has surely come to put in place a multi-lateral world order to
replace the discredited unilateral approach of George Bush. For that to
happen, the rest of the world will have to come up with a plan, and the U.S.
Congress will be called upon for support. 

The twin challenges of dealing with a domestic slump, and finding an
international solution are a lot to ask of the new Democratic Congress.
History suggests Congress can block but not lead. But when the economic
costs of the Bush presidency hit American voters, a new direction, supported
internationally, will have its appeal, and Congress will take notice. 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to