http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/bal-te.forensic26mar26,1,515246
0,print.story?ctrack=1
<http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/bal-te.forensic26mar26,1,51524
60,print.story?ctrack=1&cset=true> &cset=true

Tracking terrorists with click of a mouse


Crime center finds clues in recovered CDs, hard drives


 
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/click;h=v8/3521/0/0/%2a/a;83284014;0-0;0;12924988
;6-120/60;20172497/20190391/1;;~aopt=2/0/ff/0;~sscs=%3fhttp://essentials.bal
timoresun.com/micro_sun/travel_destinations/>  


By Siobhan Gorman
sun reporter

March 26, 2007

WASHINGTON -- Tucked away in a squat, 1980s-era office park halfway between
Washington and Baltimore, 200 digital detectives are scouring the hard
drives, MP3 players and compact discs seized from terrorist hide-outs in
search of links and clues to their next plans of attack. 

If there is a real-life version of the kind of technical wizardry that
appears in popular TV shows like CSI and 24, the Defense Department's Cyber
Crime Center in Linthicum might come closest to it -- though these
cyber-sleuths are quick to say it's not nearly as easy as Hollywood makes it
look to piece together files on a bomb-blasted hard drive. 


The craft of unearthing data hidden deep inside computer equipment has
become known as "digital forensics." And the center's executive director,
Steven D. Shirley, predicts it will revolutionize investigations much as DNA
did. 


Like DNA, digital forensic analysis can place a person at a particular
location. It can establish relationships. And it can also provide evidence
of activities, plans and intentions, Shirley said. 


"Digital forensics is probably accelerating at twice the rate that the
impact of DNA did," he said. 


Terrorists have gravitated toward modern communication devices for the same
reasons business executives do -- they're portable, agile and relatively
inexpensive. And the digital footprints terrorists leave behind on laptops,
cell phones, and Palm Pilot-type devices are providing a means to find them.



"It's become one of our primary windows on terrorism," said Jim Jaeger, a
retired Air Force brigadier general who heads the digital forensics
operation at defense industry giant General Dynamics. 


At a recent status review hearing in Guantanamo Bay for Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed, accused of being the mastermind behind the Sept. 11 attacks,
military officials introduced a slew of evidence -- including photographs,
code names and spreadsheets -- connecting Mohammed to those attacks and
other operations. 


Letters from Osama bin Laden, transcripts of chat sessions with a Sept. 11
hijacker, biographical information and photographs of the hijackers, and
records of pilot license fees for lead Sept. 11 operative Mohamed Atta were
among the pieces of evidence extracted from a computer hard drive seized
during Mohammed's capture. 


A February 2005 military raid in Iraq yielded the laptop of the leader of
al-Qaida in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Information on that computer
reportedly helped U.S. officials track down and capture his top associates. 


When Zarqawi was killed in an airstrike a year later, soldiers uncovered
additional computers, memory sticks and MP3 players that military officials
heralded as an intelligence coup. Four hundred and fifty raids followed
shortly thereafter. 


Shirley said he would not discuss whether his center played a role in
exploiting materials seized in the raids of Zarqawi's belongings because
that is classified. But, he said, "we do have the capability to do things
exactly like that." 


The Pentagon launched the Cyber Crime Center in 1998 to lend a high-tech
hand to its criminal and counterespionage investigations, but the center has
come into its own only in recent years. 


Counterterrorism and intelligence investigations, which used to make up a
small fraction of the center's cases, now represent 40 percent of its work,
said Shirley, who left a senior post in the Air Force's Office of Special
Investigations to join the center in 2004. 


The center's workload -- the volume of data it processes -- has doubled in
the past year and is more than 10 times larger than it was in 2001, as the
digital information explosion meets the government's post-Sept. 11
counterterrorism push. 


In 2006, it processed 159 terabytes of information -- one terabyte would
fill more than 8,000 file cabinets -- and it expects 40 percent more this
year. At any one time, the center is evaluating 2,500 pieces of digital
media. 


In 2001, most counterterrorism investigations of computers were limited to
printing out what could readily be found. 


Counterterrorism investigators "didn't understand the nuances of how you
could hide data within data," said Jim Christy, a senior official at the
center. 


In the CIA-led invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001, officers didn't
expect to find much electronic equipment in the mountainous region along the
Pakistani border, which has no electrical infrastructure. What they found,
Christy said, was an array of wireless computerized devices. 


"It was kind of eye-opening for everybody," he said. 


By the 2003 Iraq invasion, the Cyber Crime Center was deploying technicians
on the battlefield to provide analysis of computer equipment. 


In the center's Maryland laboratory, where the see-through cubicles look
more corporate-modern than 24, forensic investigators use high-powered
software to extract hidden information from computer equipment that has been
erased or damaged. 


The FBI, CIA, National Security Agency and other agencies also have digital
forensics efforts under way, but the Pentagon center is the largest of its
kind in the country, if not the world. It assists counterterrorism and
criminal investigators from intelligence agencies and the Defense
Department. 


As technology grows more complex and data storage becomes cheaper, the
center's digital sleuths are in a constant race to keep up. 


The real benefit of digital forensics will be realized when a soldier or
intelligence officer can seize a computer, connect to a device that sends
the information to the center and immediately retrieve information about
where a terrorist is hiding, said Gavin Manes, president of Oklahoma Digital
Forensics Professionals Inc. 


Not only are digital detectives hindered by the amount of time it takes to
copy and evaluate a hard drive, but they also must contend with computers
whose files may be encrypted or in a different language, Manes said. 


Finding analysts who understand forensic computer jargon as well as
counterterrorism has been a daunting challenge, said Evan Kohlmann, who does
digital forensic consulting in counterterrorism for the U.S. and British
governments. 


Many of those doing the computer analysis know little about terrorism, he
said. 


"It becomes very difficult to understand what you're looking at" without
knowledge of both, Kohlmann said. 


Terrorists are even more inclined to use encryption than ordinary criminals,
said Jaeger. And technology to lock up entire hard drives is readily
available, which the federal government can't crack, according to Christy. 


Perhaps the greatest challenge for digital detectives, however, is the one
that many intelligence agencies are facing in the Digital Age: the sheer
amount of ever-expanding data to sift through. 


"The volume problem," Manes said, "is going to be enormous for them, because
of what happens if they miss information." 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to